Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 113. (Read 473123 times)

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 28, 2017, 10:59:09 PM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

Okay lets go back to basics. Why do you want transparency ? What does this tell you ?

because they have stated they are transparent. proof of it goes towards their integrity. lack of it goes against.

it also shows ability to deliver prposed ideas based on expenditure. expenditure only on their own wages without deliverables shows lack of ability and financial business sense.

ive answered your questions. can you please now show how they are transparent like you said you would. you cant ask questions of others get responses and not reciprocate. please answer the question directly.

Sure no problem..... hmmmm..... weird I'll try again....... strange..... all I'm getting are the words 'FUCK OFF' when I try to respond

hmmmmm..... spider sense is tingling I'll try again 'FUCK OFF YOU TROLL'

Now why would I say that Huh

I mean your polite, articulate, have a good understanding of crypto & been around since 2014 that's a longtime. Not quite as long as myself but your definitely Obi Won Kenobi material

Got it !!! You and a couple of legendary's tried to DOX me hmmmm what was it .......... oh yeah..you said... 'Why did you as your alias leoC try to blackmail ethereum to stay quiet?'

If your thinking WTF this will help jog your memory... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.6720

Your post history is a great example of how you need to factor the people element when you go through the exercise of due diligence because at face value you tick all the boxes but..

After everything you said/done did you actually think I was going to answer your question Grin

someone else posted the link information which i checked so asked that. not sure where you can validate that i tried to dox. i can honestly say i havent tried to dox you nor do i care who you are. also your comparison is the same of you following the apparent dox of suchmoon attacking on that. you didnt dox suchmoon of attempt to but read it.

your aggression here to me appears to be your way of avoiding the transparency valudation question so not only are you being aggressive but you have also lied. you said you'd answer it but you havent.

reread that thread korvas you'll find others posted hat leoc link and i asked the question. if you spent as much time answering the transparency question as you did going through old posts looking for a way to avoid answering it when you said you would the issue would be at rest now you realise?

and yes i did think you were going to answer the question because i thought maybe this guy/gal wants to show the operation is legit but instead i guess we saw your integrity of your character with the response and lie on answering. o e could summise on that fact that its a peoject to be weary of.

Pack mentality mate..... smelt blood didn't you and thought you'd jump in, that makes you just as guilty.

Big difference with me and Suchmoon's doxing is I read it and did nothing. I don't like suchmoon so didn't care plus it's not my job to moderate. Whereas you on the other hand read Owlcatz's dox attempt and responded with I'm also blackmailing ethereum ? not the same is it.

But of course poor little innocent naive you whose been around since 2014 was just asking a question

Grin

And yes ThePointlessOne I'm still here...... can't let you bullshitters steal all the limelight... and anyway posting on here is fun & therapeutic, hope your well

ThePointlessOne

member

Activity: 124

Merit: 10

Wow. DodgerKorvas is still here deflecting legitimate questions? Not surprising. Perhaps one day he/she will stop deflecting with attacks and actually answer questions.

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: o0o0 on August 28, 2017, 05:52:34 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 28, 2017, 04:34:13 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on August 28, 2017, 05:52:34 AM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

Okay lets go back to basics. Why do you want transparency ? What does this tell you ?

because they have stated they are transparent. proof of it goes towards their integrity. lack of it goes against.

it also shows ability to deliver prposed ideas based on expenditure. expenditure only on their own wages without deliverables shows lack of ability and financial business sense.

ive answered your questions. can you please now show how they are transparent like you said you would. you cant ask questions of others get responses and not reciprocate. please answer the question directly.

Sure no problem..... hmmmm..... weird I'll try again....... strange..... all I'm getting are the words 'FUCK OFF' when I try to respond

hmmmmm..... spider sense is tingling I'll try again 'FUCK OFF YOU TROLL'

Now why would I say that Huh

I mean your polite, articulate, have a good understanding of crypto & been around since 2014 that's a longtime. Not quite as long as myself but your definitely Obi Won Kenobi material

Got it !!! You and a couple of legendary's tried to DOX me hmmmm what was it .......... oh yeah..you said... 'Why did you as your alias leoC try to blackmail ethereum to stay quiet?'

If your thinking WTF this will help jog your memory... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.6720

Your post history is a great example of how you need to factor the people element when you go through the exercise of due diligence because at face value you tick all the boxes but..

After everything you said/done did you actually think I was going to answer your question Grin

someone else posted the link information which i checked so asked that. not sure where you can validate that i tried to dox. i can honestly say i havent tried to dox you nor do i care who you are. also your comparison is the same of you following the apparent dox of suchmoon attacking on that. you didnt dox suchmoon of attempt to but read it.

your aggression here to me appears to be your way of avoiding the transparency valudation question so not only are you being aggressive but you have also lied. you said you'd answer it but you havent.

reread that thread korvas you'll find others posted hat leoc link and i asked the question. if you spent as much time answering the transparency question as you did going through old posts looking for a way to avoid answering it when you said you would the issue would be at rest now you realise?

and yes i did think you were going to answer the question because i thought maybe this guy/gal wants to show the operation is legit but instead i guess we saw your integrity of your character with the response and lie on answering. o e could summise on that fact that its a peoject to be weary of.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: korvas128 on August 28, 2017, 04:34:13 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 28, 2017, 04:34:13 AM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

Okay lets go back to basics. Why do you want transparency ? What does this tell you ?

because they have stated they are transparent. proof of it goes towards their integrity. lack of it goes against.

it also shows ability to deliver prposed ideas based on expenditure. expenditure only on their own wages without deliverables shows lack of ability and financial business sense.

ive answered your questions. can you please now show how they are transparent like you said you would. you cant ask questions of others get responses and not reciprocate. please answer the question directly.

Sure no problem..... hmmmm..... weird I'll try again....... strange..... all I'm getting are the words 'FUCK OFF' when I try to respond

hmmmmm..... spider sense is tingling I'll try again 'FUCK OFF YOU TROLL'

Now why would I say that Huh

I mean your polite, articulate, have a good understanding of crypto & been around since 2014 that's a longtime. Not quite as long as myself but your definitely Obi Won Kenobi material

Got it !!! You and a couple of legendary's tried to DOX me hmmmm what was it .......... oh yeah..you said... 'Why did you as your alias leoC try to blackmail ethereum to stay quiet?'

If your thinking WTF this will help jog your memory... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.6720

Your post history is a great example of how you need to factor the people element when you go through the exercise of due diligence because at face value you tick all the boxes but..

After everything you said/done did you actually think I was going to answer your question Grin

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

Okay lets go back to basics. Why do you want transparency ? What does this tell you ?

because they have stated they are transparent. proof of it goes towards their integrity. lack of it goes against.

it also shows ability to deliver prposed ideas based on expenditure. expenditure only on their own wages without deliverables shows lack of ability and financial business sense.

ive answered your questions. can you please now show how they are transparent like you said you would. you cant ask questions of others get responses and not reciprocate. please answer the question directly.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

Okay lets go back to basics. Why do you want transparency ? What does this tell you ?

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

i dont want to believe what i want. you said youd answer the transparency claim in a previous post and didnt. now you back out. this makes it look like you dont have an answer so resort to taking your ball and going home. people that can back things up usually do because if they have proof they want to show it.

You can do attacks on me all you want with words like patronizing all you want. you were describing integrity of teams not transparency this is a fact. so i take it you dont have any transparency evidence? ionomy should remove that claim because they dont display it.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 07:46:12 PM

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

So patronising Grin

believe what you want I'm not here to convince or educate you.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

Ionomy Ltd. Announces Power Grid, a Comprehensive Suite of Digital Currency Management and Game Monetization Services

August 18, 2017, ionomy Ltd. announces Power Grid, a comprehensive suite of digital currency management and game monetization services for game developers, gamers, and investors.

Power Grid represents a massive expansion of ionomy’s established business model, building on the success of ionomy.com investor tools and game integration, opening these services to outside developers.

PROPELLING GAME DEVELOPERS TO SUCCESS

ionomy uses digital currency technology to add new dimension to gameplay. By monetizing games with Power Grid services, independent developers and game studios produce titles that stand out from the crowd. Power Grid makes it easy for game developers to thrive by simplifying game development, from funding to marketing, and monetizing games through digital currency integration.

JUMPSTART CROWDFUNDING

Few game developers or studios have everything they need to be successful. Jumpstart fills in the gaps to them to achieve their vision. At its base, Jumpstart is a funding platform. More broadly, it connects game developers with a community of investors, players, and marketers.

LIGHTNING API

The Lightning API enables the ION Advantage for freemium games: cash-like tournament prizes, discounts, and unified multi-platform gamer accounts. Gamers compete to win ION, grow it, trade it for monetary value, or spend it on more gaming fun. Game developers who enter into full Lightning partnerships with ionomy may even be eligible for complete subsidization of substantial tournament rewards to incentivize sustained gameplay.

THUNDER TOKENS

Thunder enables developers of premium games to tokenize their in-game currencies on the ION blockchain, and sets up exchanges where these tokens can be sold. By monetizing in-game currency with Real Money Trade, Thunder sends a clear message that there’s real value in playing these games.

SPARK AD NETWORK

The Spark Ad Network delivers BTC payouts 12x faster than other networks. Digital currency means fewer hands in the till — so more money gets to the people who contribute real value. Spark is also a great choice for advertisers, offering a low cost solution to reach to valuable global demographics. Spark Analytics helps fine tune ad campaigns. Integration with ionomy means that developers who want to cross-promote their games can do so easily.

ALCHEMY EXCHANGE

ionomy services for investors have been making it safe and easy for investors of any scale to grow their ION assets. Adding Alchemy to the Power Grid adds multicurrency financial services, making ionomy.com the place to invest, convert, and manage many forms of digital wealth. Web wallets, hosted masternodes, and dynamic exchanges let users store, grow, and trade ION, BTC, Dash, Pivx, ETH, LTC, NEO, and more. And, of course, in-game currencies. From any device.

DARK MATTER (XDM)

Dark Matter is the newest asset in the ION ecosystem, and the first Thunder token on the ION chain. With a low initial supply, it is intrinsically deflationary due to a graduated burn rate: a portion of Dark Matter is destroyed with every transaction. As transactions increase, the burn accelerates — making the Power Grid a potent particle accelerator.

ABOUT IONOMY

ionomy.com is a new digital entertainment and investment platform built around the ION coin, a digital currency. By integrating ION and ION based tokens into mobile gaming and closely tying it to a user friendly platform, ionomy cultivates games with staying power and makes it easy for new users to enter the world of cryptocurrency at their own pace.

The mobile gaming market is one of the largest and fastest growing sectors in the world. Players come for the fun of gaming, and stick around when they discover the opportunity to earn rewards of real world value.

Visit ionomy.com or join the developer and user community at slack.ionomy.com.

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

korvas i asked about transparency its a claim ion team made you said earlier you'd answer it. you only mentioned knowing the team x years then said you answered my question. i then reiterated what you said and you calling it hairing. lets make it simple as you said youd answer it unless you're telling lies. in your next post only address how ion team is transparent. no confusion just that so everything in your post addresses just that. if you cant do that then ill take it you have no information on how they are transparent and thus its a lie by ion team.

edit
also korvas you have transparency and integrity confused. your trust of the team is their integrity. trust isnt something that can prove or make visible ones actions. their failure to follow their 1 game a month in the whitepaper that theysold the ico impacts their integrity.

only having some bounty addresses visible is a lack of transparency. they claim transparency but show nothing demonstrating their expenditures and actions are able to be validated.

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

Quote from: o0o0 on August 26, 2017, 03:35:06 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 08:32:24 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on August 26, 2017, 03:35:06 PM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

No, This was the roadmap at ICO...

Feel free to rip it apart

Today ION is at $1.6 which is a fair value when you reflect on Ionomy status today vs their original roadmap. Now imagine if they had been able to deliver everything on that roadmap what would the value of ION be now ?

PWR-GRD is soon to be announced and start it's implementation....... compare that to the original roadmap...... similar isn't it. As a worse case scenario imagine a partial implemention again what do you think that would have to the value of ION.

I did answer your point about transparency you just don't like my answer

so just so we both are on the same page. your transparency answer was youve known the tea team for a while. is this correct and your teansparency validation?

Stop trying to bait me, when it comes to proper due diligence the human element is just one factor. To ignore this in crypto a place where pretty much everything can be fabricated is to do so at your peril.

No easy way to test the integrity of a person or business other than to watch and this takes time.

Your post May 08 2016.... 16 months ago

I'm saying the same thing now as I told you then... you know.... when ION was like $.15 to $.20. It's now $1.68 a markup of 740% and the team are still here not going anywhere any time soon

I believe he asked about transparency, not about the price. Why does every question asked to you end with the price of ION? How does the price indicate transparency? Just curious as your two biggest statements about transparency are they are nice and you post the ION price.

How about blockchain addresses?

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 08:32:24 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 08:32:24 AM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

No, This was the roadmap at ICO...

Feel free to rip it apart

Today ION is at $1.6 which is a fair value when you reflect on Ionomy status today vs their original roadmap. Now imagine if they had been able to deliver everything on that roadmap what would the value of ION be now ?

PWR-GRD is soon to be announced and start it's implementation....... compare that to the original roadmap...... similar isn't it. As a worse case scenario imagine a partial implemention again what do you think that would have to the value of ION.

I did answer your point about transparency you just don't like my answer

so just so we both are on the same page. your transparency answer was youve known the tea team for a while. is this correct and your teansparency validation?

Stop trying to bait me, when it comes to proper due diligence the human element is just one factor. To ignore this in crypto a place where pretty much everything can be fabricated is to do so at your peril.

No easy way to test the integrity of a person or business other than to watch and this takes time.

Your post May 08 2016.... 16 months ago

I'm saying the same thing now as I told you then... you know.... when ION was like $.15 to $.20. It's now $1.68 a markup of 740% and the team are still here not going anywhere any time soon

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

No, This was the roadmap at ICO...

Feel free to rip it apart

Today ION is at $1.6 which is a fair value when you reflect on Ionomy status today vs their original roadmap. Now imagine if they had been able to deliver everything on that roadmap what would the value of ION be now ?

PWR-GRD is soon to be announced and start it's implementation....... compare that to the original roadmap...... similar isn't it. As a worse case scenario imagine a partial implemention again what do you think that would have to the value of ION.

I did answer your point about transparency you just don't like my answer

so just so we both are on the same page. your transparency answer was youve known the tea team for a while. is this correct and your teansparency validation?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

This roadmap is still on the ionomy.com website with no indication that it's outdated. It doesn't take 17 months to change a few sentences, or just replace it with "we'll make shit up as we go", which is the real ionomy roadmap.

Re "simple games" nonsense - when Gravity came out and was ridiculed for having only 10 levels you claimed it was incomplete. So the original plan was simple games once a month, now the plan is simple incomplete games once every two years?

But sure, your shilly fantasies sound better than the reality.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 05:11:11 AM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

No, This was the roadmap at ICO...

Feel free to rip it apart

Today ION is at $1.6 which is a fair value when you reflect on Ionomy status today vs their original roadmap. Now imagine if they had been able to deliver everything on that roadmap what would the value of ION be now ?

PWR-GRD is soon to be announced and start it's implementation....... compare that to the original roadmap...... similar isn't it. As a worse case scenario imagine a partial implemention again what do you think that would have to the value of ION.

I did answer your point about transparency you just don't like my answer

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2017, 08:49:58 PM