is the dash instamine 54%+ of the coin supply that is controlled by 1 entity like it is with ion? i highly doubt it
that % is higher now since they stake/node their 54%+ share. they sold some of this via web page PNG's but its probably in the range of few btc. inflation has created ~3.2 million coins so far. if they sold 0 the ionomy team would have generated >1.728 million coins vs the customers <1.472 million. (i'm granting them the assumption that they are not selling their premine for daily costs like they did with paycoin. once there are no ICO funds left they are forced back into it)
ion has no real devs hence they had to dump their first coin and move on to the next. they couldn't launch a working coin. even then hiring temp help to get the new coin running. that means there is no competent (coin) dev team. please enlighten us since you are more of an ion expert: point to some new things they have created for the coin? fixing 1 old bug in a shitcoin is not really developing anything imo... i did a quick look at their github and couldn't find anything worth mentioning but please do correct me or is this the part where you say "its not a crypto project. look at the games"?
we are a year into this and here are the results
edit: totally forgot they didn't sell all their ICO coins (obviously they pocketed those coins skewing the % even more)
You raise a couple of interesting points setting the scene for an interesting discussion but your comments are totally meaningless as your intent is to troll. Me countering your comments is just giving you ammunition to fuel your agenda of ill intent.
Ionomy is a long term initiative in which year 1 as been all about building foundations.