[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 153.

labe1971

member

Activity: 132

Merit: 10

Quote from: altheshort on May 19, 2017, 05:34:48 AM

Quote from: labe1971 on May 19, 2017, 04:53:42 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much was was ION one year ago in sats? Also, how much was BTC one year ago in USD?

sorry,I dont understand.
What is wrong with ION traded on yobit?

The Ion on Yobit was the same Ion, but it was rebased in February to fix some problems so it may not be the same Ion chain now. There have also (allegedly -- I've not traded there) been problems with Yobit withdrawls across a number of coins so trade with caution.

Thank you very much for explanation

altheshort

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 113

Quote from: labe1971 on May 19, 2017, 04:53:42 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much was was ION one year ago in sats? Also, how much was BTC one year ago in USD?

sorry,I dont understand.
What is wrong with ION traded on yobit?

The Ion on Yobit was the same Ion, but it was rebased in February to fix some problems so it may not be the same Ion chain now. There have also (allegedly -- I've not traded there) been problems with Yobit withdrawls across a number of coins so trade with caution.

labe1971

member

Activity: 132

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much was was ION one year ago in sats? Also, how much was BTC one year ago in USD?

sorry,I dont understand.
What is wrong with ION traded on yobit?

labe1971

member

Activity: 132

Merit: 10

There is a ION coin traded at yobit @ 4300 sats. Its the same ION or not?
Why so different price with Bittrex?

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

As a big investor in ION, a game centric coin, you don't care about the game play stats? Kind of foolish if you ask me. Then again, you are an ION whale, says a lot. You base your decisions on hopes and dreams, not transparent, factual information.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: CryptoBuds on May 18, 2017, 04:51:50 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:15:06 PM

Quote from: CryptoBuds on May 17, 2017, 07:12:29 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:05:00 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

The only thing Gawsome here is your analysis

Could you provide the average daily and weekly player count?

No

Of course you won't cause it won't paint the roses picture of ION you shills want everyone to see. Sad, but completely ovvious.

Wrong it's because I don't know the answer Grin

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: o0o0 on May 17, 2017, 11:07:27 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

what is done with the ion they buy back? do they sell back on the market thus making any buyback null and void? do they burn it? do they sell it in promotions etc?

what is done with the ion they buy back? do they sell back on the market thus making any buyback null and void? do they burn it? do they sell it in promotions etc?
[/quote]

33% of the AD revenue adds additional buy pressure by purchasing ION from the market which today = ION is bought from Bittrex

The ION bought is then given away as tournament prizes.

An example......

It all goes back into the ecosystem helping to fuel growth

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

Quote from: lyhdoh on May 18, 2017, 04:58:43 AM

It was stated they weren't going to do a game a month due to wanting to produce higher quality game

Would you consider Gravity to be a high quality game that warranted the 10 months of development and delays? Does the quality of Gravity instill confidence in you that they are going to produce smash hits that makes your investment worthwhile? What is your definition of a "quality game"?

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: lyhdoh on May 18, 2017, 04:58:43 AM

It was stated they weren't going to do a game a month due to wanting to produce higher quality game

higher quality unfinished games like gravity? it was held back to be "higher quality"

lyhdoh

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

It was stated they weren't going to do a game a month due to wanting to produce higher quality game

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

Quote from: o0o0 on May 17, 2017, 11:07:27 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

what is done with the ion they buy back? do they sell back on the market thus making any buyback null and void? do they burn it? do they sell it in promotions etc?

I bet they sell it at a later date. They're not doing this for the good of the coin, they're doing this to eventually out the ad revenue into their pockets. Which is what will be happening if they sell the buyback coins. But it looks good to the brainless Ionites that are too ignorant or greedy to think it out and ask questions.

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:15:06 PM

Quote from: CryptoBuds on May 17, 2017, 07:12:29 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:05:00 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

The only thing Gawsome here is your analysis

Could you provide the average daily and weekly player count?

No

Of course you won't cause it won't paint the roses picture of ION you shills want everyone to see. Sad, but completely ovvious.

o0o0

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1021

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

what is done with the ion they buy back? do they sell back on the market thus making any buyback null and void? do they burn it? do they sell it in promotions etc?

kken01

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1009

the breakdown of the IAP/ads were 33% buy pressure, 33% shop (does it exist?) and 33% dev profit
= 1.05 BTC revenue

i have my doubts its the last months share. more than likely its the last 76 days but if im wrong they should state what happened to rest of the coins (46 days). btw i highlighted your ad problem when gravity launched (serving max 1 ad per week in low income countries). in the developed world you wont get people to watch 30-60s adds for few pennies - (edit: unless the game is very addictive and geared towards children. i would argue gravity is neither)

good for them for trying some transparency. maybe they should have started with that strategy and ion would be valued a bit higher. it will be a huge hurdle to gain traction now. plenty of game coins out there with actual volume + games with a lot of users. funny how those people mirror the ionites pretty well tho. pasting pictures of the gaming market then talking about gaining 1% of the market. yes totally feasible

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:05:00 PM

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

Enjoy.. Smiley

https://vimeo.com/217876741

Your dislike of facts doesn't make them wrong. The numbers are what they are, whatever the current excuse. It doesn't matter what I think or what the "team" promised or what paycoiners expected. It's over a year now and all they've done is a delicious shit sandwich.

BTW - wouldn't it be the team's responsibility to make sure ad delivery is working? I recall huey saying something about the ads being disabled due to not providing the expected result, so it's not like this was some force majeure circumstance as you're making it sound.

Here is a great illustration of how that buy pressure is building so far. Halfway through this week we have 16 players:

Loading...

Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

May have been slightly photoshopped.

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: CryptoBuds on May 17, 2017, 07:12:29 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:05:00 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

The only thing Gawsome here is your analysis

Could you provide the average daily and weekly player count?

No

CryptoBuds

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1042

HODL

Quote from: korvas128 on May 17, 2017, 07:05:00 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

The only thing Gawsome here is your analysis

Could you provide the average daily and weekly player count?

korvas128

hero member

Activity: 1248

Merit: 583

Quote from: suchmoon on May 17, 2017, 04:49:24 PM

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

It's over a year now and all you've done is troll everything Ionomy have done literally EVERYTHING !!!.

If you actually think the team would spend time, resource & money on developing infrastructure that is going to generate $500 a month then you need to replace the moon with fool.

Ionomy are here for the long term and so overtime this buy pressure will build. If you'd actually played Gravity you would know that in this 30 day window AD delivery wasn't properly working so a chunk of AD revenue was lost.

Enjoy.. Smiley

https://vimeo.com/217876741

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Shark, what's the point of posting a screenshot where you can't click on the links... you really suck at this "promotion" thing.

https://news.ionomy.com/ion-wallet-updates-ionomy-studios-revenue-supports-ion-btc-market/

Links at the bottom.

As to the buyback... first of all, patting themselves on the back for "transparency" after dodging any serious questions for a year is just pathetic. Shut up and DO transparency instead of bragging about it. The BTC TX ID is misleading. I'm guessing the 0.35 BTC amount is the one we need to be looking at. They seem to be reusing a deposit address that is also used for other purposes (11+ BTC total), making it unnecessarily confusing.

ION inflation is 20k+ coins per day ATM. Let's say the "team" is nice enough to not sell theirs (75%), which still leaves 5k daily added to the selling pressure and even being advertised as "income" on their various sites and shillposts. 0.35 BTC buys about one third of that (1700 ION). That's right, month's worth of buyback buys 1/3 of day's worth of inflation. Gawsome.

WildShark

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 500

Quote from: altheshort on May 17, 2017, 01:07:02 PM

Quote from: WildShark on May 17, 2017, 12:52:24 PM

Quote from: altheshort on May 17, 2017, 05:08:22 AM

Quote from: o0o0 on May 17, 2017, 03:54:45 AM

i sold 55 million digibyte (dgb) at highs. they have at least some gaming integration etc.
its clearly pump groups in action too...

whats it say for ion when even pump groups wont touch it? why cause huey has all the premine hah

There's this weird malaise going on with the team, who knew that the big staker release would be happening now and could have at least attempted to re engage with those investors who might be wondering what's going on before the release happened, and yet they chose the opposite and stayed silent instead. Moves like this make no sense to me from a strategic perspective.

While I'm aware there's not a vast amount of selling (or buying) going on, there just appears to be very little effort to actually hold on to existing investors who might see the endless waiting for anything -- a single update to 'Crypto Gravity', even -- as a negative indicator. They don't have many investors or community members anyway, so I'd have thought retaining those who might be leaning towards selling would be a priority. This lethargic approach is a big part of why ion has and will continue to struggle to get a foothold with other investors or even, as you point out, pump groups. They're simply not active enough.

550 USD for the first 30 days ad revenue and buyback of ION off the market

I'd say that was a good start for the first month...

I suppose it depends on your perspective. I'm not sure those sorts of amounts will add enough buy pressure to sustain your exchange prices, but I'll concede that it's a start. Not sure month two revenue will be as good, as the number of users seemed to slide after the first three - four weeks, but I guess it depends how dedicated the 40 or so weekly players are. I still think you'll struggle to maintain or generate larger numbers of users when the gestation for products and updates is so slow, and the quality is lacking. It leads to stagnation, and I've yet to see anything that will appeal to a larger audience from XPY.io or team Ion.

Fair's fair, however; they said they would start a buyback mechanism, and (eventually) they did.

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 153. (Read 473154 times)