Where are the proofs Qora refers to, is the source no longer obfuscated when decompiled?
Nobody else interested in these proofs that will end the speculation and debate? Qora himself says they exist.
Topic: [ANN] Qora | Released 16 May | 100% POS | New Source - page 122. (Read 748232 times)
Where are the proofs Qora refers to, is the source no longer obfuscated when decompiled?
Nobody else interested in these proofs that will end the speculation and debate? Qora himself says they exist.
You can forge SAFELY with Version 13 because the wallet doesn't need to remain unlocked.
Is there an indicator that the client is forging when locked or some way to verify that the client is forging when locked?
I have seen this many times, the developer who has a lot of the coins dumps and runs off. I think it is Qora who is dumping now this much.
Newbie account created for FUD ? go play with your toys noob and stop spreading FUD.
Those who don't need money and are selling their Qora, are idiots 
I have seen this many times, the developer who has a lot of the coins dumps and runs off. I think it is Qora who is dumping now this much.
hello , Newbie,
I have seen this many times, Many women betrayed her husband. I think your wife betrayed you.
actually , some guys wanna get source to clone ,that why two or three guys always require dev to release source .
lol it is not enough, it's insolence to offer him stake in some stupid clone
I have seen this many times, the developer who has a lot of the coins dumps and runs off. I think it is Qora who is dumping now this much.
wow, experienced brand new acc
I am in the chatroom.
so much bullshit,
You should ask if “2”
I mean 2. Source should be opened to 1 or 2 people chosed by qora
win the vote,who will review the code?
like a man,we waiting a answer face to face
so much bullshit,
You should ask if “2”
I mean 2. Source should be opened to 1 or 2 people chosed by qora
win the vote,who will review the code?
Please vote, Qora people. What do you think would be the best for Qora and the community. Should the source remain closed for now or it's better if qora chooses a couple of people he trusts and share the source with them.
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
like a man,we waiting a answer face to face
dev,I will always support you.
I have seen this many times, the developer who has a lot of the coins dumps and runs off. I think it is Qora who is dumping now this much.
why don't you come there?
http://qora.co.in/chat/logs/2014/07/26.html
[12:27:56] Who would you consider trusted people?
funny,why he not come here?
@dzarmush,or other people,I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code again again again again again.
[12:27:56]
funny,why he not come here?
Please vote, Qora people. What do you think would be the best for Qora and the community. Should the source remain closed for now or it's better if qora chooses a couple of people he trusts and share the source with them.
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
@dzarmush,or other people,I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code again again again again again.
2. Source should be opened to 1 or 2 people chosed by qora
I will vote this,but I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code.
I will vote this,but I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code.
are you sure? you should use a Sr. Member to bet, not a Newbie!!
Good or bad, it's great to see all this activity. Qora should absolutely have 2 people entrusted with a private github and in case anything should ever happen to him, sometimes shit happens. In my opinion, it should be 2 BTT members of the highest character that are not affiliated with any POS coins (including our community) therefore avoiding a conflict of interest.
As for open source, no rush here, it appears the community has voted and the source will remain closed until a later date. You don't like it, there's always Kora. Perhaps you can pressure that developer to actually create his own code instead of trying to bleed a work in progress.
And to everyone that is dumping, thank you. Many of us learned in our short life at Nxt that dumping a POS coin is a good thing when distribution is concerned, in fact perhaps necessary. I'm sure many of the dumpers have made a profit on their original stakes and are moving on. Oh well, you win some you lose some. Let's keep this momentum going.
well said As for open source, no rush here, it appears the community has voted and the source will remain closed until a later date. You don't like it, there's always Kora. Perhaps you can pressure that developer to actually create his own code instead of trying to bleed a work in progress.
And to everyone that is dumping, thank you. Many of us learned in our short life at Nxt that dumping a POS coin is a good thing when distribution is concerned, in fact perhaps necessary. I'm sure many of the dumpers have made a profit on their original stakes and are moving on. Oh well, you win some you lose some. Let's keep this momentum going.
http://qora.co.in/chat/logs/2014/07/26.html
[12:27:56] Who would you consider trusted people?
funny,why he not come here?
@dzarmush,or other people,I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code again again again again again.
[12:27:56]
funny,why he not come here?
Please vote, Qora people. What do you think would be the best for Qora and the community. Should the source remain closed for now or it's better if qora chooses a couple of people he trusts and share the source with them.
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
Name: first voting on the source code
Creator: QRhPStz6C4C4MBgC9kmbUbJRQdGsZqe1EK
@dzarmush,or other people,I bet that he won't give anybody look at the code again again again again again.
Good or bad, it's great to see all this activity. Qora should absolutely have 2 people entrusted with a private github and in case anything should ever happen to him, sometimes shit happens. In my opinion, it should be 2 BTT members of the highest character that are not affiliated with any POS coins (including our community) therefore avoiding a conflict of interest.
As for open source, no rush here, it appears the community has voted and the source will remain closed until a later date. You don't like it, there's always Kora. Perhaps you can pressure that developer to actually create his own code instead of trying to bleed a work in progress.
And to everyone that is dumping, thank you. Many of us learned in our short life at Nxt that dumping a POS coin is a good thing when distribution is concerned, in fact perhaps necessary. I'm sure many of the dumpers have made a profit on their original stakes and are moving on. Oh well, you win some you lose some. Let's keep this momentum going.
As for open source, no rush here, it appears the community has voted and the source will remain closed until a later date. You don't like it, there's always Kora. Perhaps you can pressure that developer to actually create his own code instead of trying to bleed a work in progress.
And to everyone that is dumping, thank you. Many of us learned in our short life at Nxt that dumping a POS coin is a good thing when distribution is concerned, in fact perhaps necessary. I'm sure many of the dumpers have made a profit on their original stakes and are moving on. Oh well, you win some you lose some. Let's keep this momentum going.
qora in chatroom.
really,you have review the code?
Nice try
Actually
Actually
Quote from: Jean-Luc
It is not a clone, at least not a clone of the recent code. The code is obfuscated (probably proguard?) and I don't have time to dig further, but seems to be using a lot of third party libraries that we [Nxt] don't use. Uses jetty, and json-simple, but also jackson and mapdb, no H2.
The developer has definitely borrowed ideas from Nxt, but probably not much from the current implementation.
As for the speculations that it may be BCNext himself - not his style, remember the original Nxt code did not use any other libraries (even the jetty dependency was added later by CfB) and was a single file. It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did, but then continued his own way into a completely different implementation. But all this may have been intentional, to confuse people - so the conspiracy theories will keep going on.
The developer has definitely borrowed ideas from Nxt, but probably not much from the current implementation.
As for the speculations that it may be BCNext himself - not his style, remember the original Nxt code did not use any other libraries (even the jetty dependency was added later by CfB) and was a single file. It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did, but then continued his own way into a completely different implementation. But all this may have been intentional, to confuse people - so the conspiracy theories will keep going on.
thank you
It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did
I think I know why he is afraid,I have get the answer.
maybe I am joke，or We have witnessed a great scam.
It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did
I think I know why he is afraid,I have get the answer.
maybe I am joke，or We have witnessed a great scam.
really,you have review the code?
Nice try
Actually
Actually
Quote from: Jean-Luc
It is not a clone, at least not a clone of the recent code. The code is obfuscated (probably proguard?) and I don't have time to dig further, but seems to be using a lot of third party libraries that we [Nxt] don't use. Uses jetty, and json-simple, but also jackson and mapdb, no H2.
The developer has definitely borrowed ideas from Nxt, but probably not much from the current implementation.
As for the speculations that it may be BCNext himself - not his style, remember the original Nxt code did not use any other libraries (even the jetty dependency was added later by CfB) and was a single file. It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did, but then continued his own way into a completely different implementation. But all this may have been intentional, to confuse people - so the conspiracy theories will keep going on.
The developer has definitely borrowed ideas from Nxt, but probably not much from the current implementation.
As for the speculations that it may be BCNext himself - not his style, remember the original Nxt code did not use any other libraries (even the jetty dependency was added later by CfB) and was a single file. It is more likely a good java developer who started from the original Nxt 0.4.x code like I did, but then continued his own way into a completely different implementation. But all this may have been intentional, to confuse people - so the conspiracy theories will keep going on.
Jump to: