Nicehash pool is up and running now. I wonder what that's going to do to the coin?
For the moment nothing, as far as it is not included in the NHM. 
Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 292. (Read 823878 times)
nicehash is good news, but I am glad they are added after the halving.
More hashrate / miners increases the diff, so less coins for more individual miners which is good
More hashrate / miners increases the diff, so less coins for more individual miners which is good
Nicehash pool is up and running now. I wonder what that's going to do to the coin?
Rape it for sure Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Where are you @ocminer??
ah sorry, it takes about 15-20 min until the correct hashrate is displayed on suprnova, did you wait long enough ?
i'll tweak something so that calculations should be faster
Oh ok, i can wait till you fix that.
Ofc not too much. 
I m using a yiimp pool too. Everything is ok.
Nicehash pool is up and running now wonder what that going to do to the coin?
Will difficulty raise?
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Where are you @ocminer??
ah sorry, it takes about 15-20 min until the correct hashrate is displayed on suprnova, did you wait long enough ?
i'll tweak something so that calculations should be faster
https://ethermine.org
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
I don't know last time i used yiimp they stole about 30% of my shares, its reported as a scampool - @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Hows your experience with it lately?
I'm fine with yiimp.
Last weekend I mined DNR, I couldn't find a better pool.
Currently mining SIGT there (better profit than DNR today for nvidia GPUs), yiimp looks consistent.
Since I am using tpruvot ccminer, glad to pay pool fee.
Nicehash pool is up and running now. I wonder what that's going to do to the coin?
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Where are you @ocminer??
ah sorry, it takes about 15-20 min until the correct hashrate is displayed on suprnova, did you wait long enough ?
i'll tweak something so that calculations should be faster
Listing on Bittrex any soon guys?
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
I don't know last time i used yiimp they stole about 30% of my shares, its reported as a scampool - @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Hows your experience with it lately?
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Where are you @ocminer??
Yeah, since I am strongly using suprnova.
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
Where are you @ocminer??
There might be something going on with the 2.2 version i'm staying with SPmod
Try with a different pool: do you still get lower hashrate?
I switched to another pool and my hashrate looks correct.
Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
- @suprnova: lower hashrate.
- @yiimp: correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn: correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?
I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s
I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s
I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !
what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this
i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers
Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:
Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s
Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot
I am testing my 1080 Ti also with ccminer 2.2 -- on the miner it shows ~10% gain from krnlx miner (55 vs. 50).
On the pool it shows lower result as well -- I am seeing only high 30s to low 40s range so far after ~40 shares.
I may let it run the rest of the day on this machine & see if that changes.
Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?
There might be something going on with the 2.2 version i'm staying with SPmod
Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?
How can you tell your exact hash rate on the pool? My miner program reports ~50MH/s. I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s
I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s
I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !
what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this
i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers
Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:
Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s
Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot
I am testing my 1080 Ti also with ccminer 2.2 -- on the miner it shows ~10% gain from krnlx miner (55 vs. 50).
On the pool it shows lower result as well -- I am seeing only high 30s to low 40s range so far after ~40 shares.
I may let it run the rest of the day on this machine & see if that changes.
Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-signatum-classic-official-launch-skunk-hash-algo-1000000-blocks-pow-2088091
SIGT classic ???hehehe
wtf is this lmao SIGT classic ???hehehe
Random people can clone any coin they want to. For example, there's many coins with the word bitcoin in it. It's completely unrelated to us. Someone Copy and pasted signatum and is creating a clone of it. They won't have our marketplace, community, or exchanges. It doesn't take away from signatum at all. You can tell by the typos that it is not a serious project.
Jump to: