Topic: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales NEW STOCK ***NOW SHIPPING*** - page 167. (Read 576775 times)

I said they never indicated any terms regarding h-boards differences in hashrate. I was pretty clear about that.
If you manage to get compensated by Apple in such scenario, good for you! And if you didn't perhaps either you were unable to negotiate or you simply failed to read their T&C because I can bet you that's already covered! Apple is not that dumb to leave out from their contract agreements something as common as that. Go and read it yourself and let me know if you manage to get something out of it. Apple will give you something (if you prove it). . In this case, we are talking about how 2 products are relatively priced to each other. Your Apple scenario is irrelevant.

Wake up, dude.  Do you think that in this industry prices of products with same specs delivered later are cheaper just because Dave is in good mood?? It's purely an economics decision whether you feel offended or not. Make no mistake son. This IS a zero-sum game where people's actions affect others' because in this case, yes, they do. This is pure capitalism no matter how Buddhist or friendly you are so you need to stop taking things personal.

I'm dying to know what innovation getting products earlier would bring so as to offset their price. Has nothing to do with protectionism. Don't overcomplicate it: just basic Price+Terms. That's it.

i am waiting anxiously for my 25gh kit ...i am using the flat fee shipping to canada too

was doubled.

  Everyone else already paid.

Is 200TH the original amount or did they double it?

And whatever new products arrive in the future, they will definitely reflect in their prices and terms feedback from most people. I'm pretty sure they won't have the luxury of commanding a large yet arbitrary premium just for a very wide/uncertain gap. Things will get more formalized and become more specific just as some other industry players are starting to do. In any case, Bitfury is way far ahead than any other player in terms of commitment and accountability.

So you chose to respond to nothing other than a hypothetical suggestion about difficulty increase (**not given as a demand, but a conceptual reason, relevant given other companies "ROI protection" schemes**), ignoring the clear analogy to the extra h-boards. Nice. Forget the overriding themes of squelching success and entitlement mentality, as if early orders have any claim on later ones, or on what a business decides to do to improve things for customers who arrived after you.

Continuing with such bitter logic, Apple should compensate you if the next revision of the iPhone is released any earlier than exactly 365 days from the old one, because you bought yours expecting a full year head start, getting the maximum use for your $$, compared to the lucky saps who get additional features in their next-gen phone. You factored that year of use into your purchasing decision, and now, horror of horrors, Apple releases the new iPhone 30 days early. Clearly you have been robbed in such a scenario.

The essence of your position is that you lose if someone else benefits, whether or not what you have is altered in any way. That kind of attitude often resorts to protectionism when faced with progress and innovation in the marketplace.

What you propose is that Dave should sit on his hands, even if he has the ability to deliver early, to fulfill some imaginary obligation to the August orders, that the time gap between August 31st and October 31st be maintained. Where in the world is it written, once you have received your August Kit as paid for, that there is any continuing contract or arrangement between such a customer and the manufacturer? You paid, got your order, and if unforseen conditions change over time, where is the obligation to preserve the time gap?

You have no problem dealing with the unforseeable developments of difficulty increases, so why are unforseen shifts in component delivery and fulfillment any different? Why is it ok to be late delivering product, but not early?? No one is demanding compensation for being a few days past the end of August, so in what world does it make sense to demand compensation for a possible early delivery?

Interesting...

The standard shipping is going UPS ground from Maumee, OH.   I was expecting USPS from somewhere in Washington.
Looking forward to hooking up my unit.  
I have been miner-less for a couple of months now since my Ares 5870x2 blew out.

Edit:  Unrelated package shipment information.  Not MBP miner. Just wishful thinking.

Punin said a few weeks ago that he expects to start shipping in early October if not late September.. I would expect Dave to be working with the same timeframe, but who knows.

Whatever they decide, one thing is for sure. They will first work on getting the 200TH network up asap.

False. False. False.  The price and time difference is already there advertised in Bitfury store so simply asking to be executed. Sorry if you took it as a "punishment" but when you pick the 3-blade razor at the store rather than the 4-blade razor, do you feel punished? No, right? It's just a different product based on what you can afford and expecting different outcomes. The difference here is that times plays a factor as well. I'm not even talking about the difference in hash rates and it's up to Bitfury to that figure out if they want. That is irrelevant to the basic discussion. You are right: we worked on the knowledge that it's a 2-month difference at the time of investment, so yes, it's a  2-month protection gap.
The argument about compensating due to increases in difficulty: difficulty changes applies to all customers equally and in any case, it was never advertised or referred in any way in the description of the products advertised. Neither did Bitfury make any commitments about difficulty at all.  I'm simply focusing on the advertised terms not in imaginary or unrelated aspects. That's it.
Bitfury is not going to ignore my arguments or of any August customers just because of your wishful thinking because guess what?  it's still displayed in their store right now!

For Oct debate, Punin said "I've added option for UPS Express Saver shipping, and dropped the prices a bit as further october orders will most likely ship in very late october. Those who picked first october orders are likely to receive theirs in very early october, if not september."

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2967968

Ofcourse thing can change.

yeah, without the fab fkup, august orders would be in much better shape in terms of ROI. this delay of a few days compared to EU orders also hurts quite a bit since we're making another big diff jump today. the usd/btc exchange rate was shit during the august sales too. august orders ROI not looking good. that said, the bitfury team/distributors are still miles ahead of the competition.

Im with you DrJoeGrine, I think we were both in the BFL camp at one point. I know how that worked out.

Go Dave!!!!  

Disagree. Dave and all vendors are (and rightfully should be) completely free to overdeliver on what they promise. Such achievements are very good P.R., as they further differentiate between themselves and other companies which underdeliver (if at all). They demonstrate their ability to innovate and improve, and increases confidence.

You are proposing, however to extract punishment from (or compensate) one group or another based on later success. That's just ass-backwards. Penalizing success? exceeding goals? What exactly are you trying to motivate here?

Case in point - initial tests showed H-boards not hashing at their advertised 25GH speed. So additional H-boards were included for free to the initial customers -- and likely only them, as later batches should have tweaks made to achieve the advertise rate per board. This meant people who ordered a 25GH starter kit are now sitting on 40GH of hashpower.

Now, according to your logic, this is an unfair bonus given to one group (early orders) that later orders do not receive. Should Dave now "compensate" later orders that won't receive such extra hashpower with $$ to offset the difference? Didn't those later orders make their choices based upon calculations which weighed the cost of 25GH in august vs. 25GH in october? Have they not been wronged?? Hogwash.

Shipping october orders any earlier than the 31st would NOT cause to "harm" to earlier orders. They got what they paid for, and they worked with what knowledge was available at the time of order, like everyone else. You could even make a case that shipping Oct earlier would actually be more than fair because of the steep increase in difficulty rendering earlier ROI predictions to be way off, so the earlier delivery would be a move to compensate (as other companies have attempted various schemes to preserve estimated ROI).

Dave - ignore this guy and send everything out as soon as humanly possible.

Did you eat paint chips as a kid of something???

I don't think it's necessarily much relative to the current $ per Gh/s of competitive products available at this point in time. That's actually the mathematical formula that tells you the earliest possible October orders should be delivered (>6.0 weeks after August ones :-)

I will concede my argument. Either way I am finally happy with an asic company. I have no complaints and can't wait to receive my gear. Congrats all around.

$19,250 to be exact.

The premium over Oct delivery is $19,250 - $8,000 = $11,250.

Looks like we paid too much as it would take about 6 weeks to make up this premium. However, had the current difficulty turned out to be little lower the tables would have been turned completely.

I don't think that's how it works. Both products are delivered by the same company and offered at the same time to compare. Hence, investment decisions are not made in the vacuum. You pick either the gold or the platinum product just like any other company providing various offerings whose trade-offs are incorporated and reflected in their pricing and terms difference.

I agree with you for the most part but I don't think you paid extra to have two months of mining before more would ship. I think you paid extra for August delivery, by the end of August as the deadline, it could have been sooner except for the fab snafu. We paid for Oct delivery with a deadline of Oct 31st, but sooner is a possibility.