Topic: [ANN] Whirlwind.money | ⚡No Fee⚡ | Ultimate Privacy | Anonymity Mining 12% APR🔥 - page 18. (Read 12718 times)

I don't believe they refunded a user for his mistakes before. There was a case where someone deposited and also didn't save his private key. They asked the community and the opinion was pretty clear that they shouldn't refund.
Here's the short description:

And that was their statement after the community had their opinion on it:

---

You popping up here out of nowhere and calling the user "stormy" instead of his real username "stormbounty" makes me wonder what connection you two have. You previously stated that there is no connection.
Still makes me wonder what you are trying to accomplish.

Yes because we can easily mixed from Bitcoin to ETH,  XMR and vice vassal This is a big addition to anonymity privacy and control,  I for one will love to try that out right away if it available or I will look forward to when that feature is fully implemented on the site.


Indeed some exciting time ahead!

Got it.. so for now they can sort it still
Anyways, nice to meet you & have a great day.

Actually, it seems I was wrong about that part in my previous reply. Such a system of notes has not yet been implemented and is planned with the introduction of ZK based Notes:


I made the wrong conclusion, and I believe I've read other comments stating the same thing, suggesting that such a system is already in place.

Just for my personal knowledge

Whirlwind notes are a non-custodial type of wallet
Those wallets doesn't have private key they know?

Whirlwind already paid that amount once
Paid to who? And why not to stormy?

Wallets isn't accessible
Do you mean there's a wallet generator in their interface and it generates a new wallet upon order then he gives them that wallet private key manually as notes? Why? As long as they need it why not recorded internally? If it's the case return to prev question why then paid and to who?

Staking your address on this forum, in my opinion, holds little relevance in this particular case. Yes, it proves that the user indeed owns the address used to deposit funds on Whirlwind. However, beyond that, it doesn't prove anything else.

The whole case boils down to the user's claim that he lost access (private key) to the funded note and can't retrieve the coins. However, besides his words, there's no concrete proof to support it. But, even if he manage to prove it, it's still not Whirlwind's responsibility nor their obligation to compensate for the lost funds. Whirlwind notes are a non-custodial type of wallet, so it's unreasonable to hold them accountable for the loss of funds.

---

You are wrong because, as you admitted yourself, you assumed something that was clearly not the case. I don't want to go into the details of how clearnet and TOR domains work, but that was a very wrong assumption. Moreover, even if you were using the same browser and opened a new tab on the same domain, your notes would still be generated with a new private key. (I just took 15 seconds to check it myself.) So, I'm baffled as to where such an assumption about something so crucial comes from.

Your second mistake was not saving the private key (and double-checking it) BEFORE depositing the funds, which is explicitly stated on the website. It's as simple as clicking a mouse to download a text file, so there's no need for manual copy-pasting into Notepad.

And finally, you're also wrong in expecting Whirlwind to bear the loss (even if it's a relatively small amount) due to clearly YOUR mistake. As I said before, even if we assume your story is true, those funds are now inaccessible to anyone, which doesn't change the fact that Whirlwind already paid that amount once. So why should they compensate you twice for your mistake?


THANK YOU!  

Yes you and your supreme leader just stole my $200 fuck you..

---

There is no crypto service on earth that doesnt implement a checking step to be sure the correct private key/ mnemonic phrases are saved. except of course THIS scam of a mixer

So this is what it has come down to again. If the trolling and the constant flooding of this thread with consecutive posts minutes apart both from the stormbounty account and the CryptoHFs account is not enough, the mention of religion and profanities have become their chosen choice of expression.

The stormbounty account and the CryptoHFs account are on my trust exclusion and will probably be added to my ignore list too.

Dude right now the clearet is down again.. in my case i saved clearnet private key and clicked to go to deposit page and it went down, i now opened the onion key, noticed the key began with same letters as clearnet page (first 2 letters), i assumed it will be same since it was same browser.. i clicked to deposit, i deposited and got stuck because the way the ux is, there is no way to proceed to withdrawal after a deposit. i messaged support, maybe there is a proceed button im not seeing, and support didnt even bother to reply... How the fuck am i wrong!



FUCK YOU

For sure I won't go back and read all that but I have a very direct concept.

What is this forum trust built on? I believe that the most trusted resource on this forum is the topic (stake your address here) so this forum values a signed message in the first place.

Based on this and what I understand that he did sign a message from the sending address.

If this is considered a shit in this forum then you are breaking down the concept of address staking and how it validates a person.

So, are you with or against the address staking idea? You can't be with it but against this guy issue unless having no morals.

I will remove the sig text but I want to see this resolved.

So, what's your take on what went down and what exactly should WWM have done in this situation? I'm not sure how much you know about what happened, but I recommend giving the last few pages of this thread a thorough read to get a better idea of what's going on. Have you ever considered the possibility that this person might be wrong, and that's why they don't have the support of the community?



I don't believe that to be true, and I doubt that you have an example of such a situation ever happening.

Well, I saw a whole community against one person so I decided to jump in and make the fight fair. If admins can prove its an alt you are welcome.

Here https://youtu.be/Q9-F4wi6bz4  

Aaaash now I understand.. you did like WW in the past with the bitcoin girl..

What is the real relationship between the CryptoHFs and stormbounty account? Yes it has been noticed by more than one member.

The fact you are constantly posting in this thread points to you having an ulterior motive. What I do not understand is that of you use your personal text to write Whirlwind cannot be trusted, what you are doing posting in the Whirlwind thread?

As far as I understood the announcement, there will be a fee involved for mixing through different currencies. In the beginning, whirlwind would have to provide liquidity on all chains to support the mixing but once user deposits on all different chains come in, they will have liquidity and the fees will keep the service alive.
This would drastically increase anonymity and being able to withdraw in multiple/different currencies makes the whole process flexible for the user.
We will have to wait for the release to be certain though, especially regarding the fees involved.

Sadly this thread is still being bombarded with spam

Got it! You need to pay btc and receive eth. I thought you were looking for normal eth mixer. For WW I don't really know how they mix I never read the Ann nor used any mixer before thus yes mixers can do better.

I checked the thread and saw nothing to be getting excited about. Whatever the OP is trying to achieve in that thread it seems something completely to Whirlwind has achieved and is trying to achieve. If I read the format correctly, there are no similarities between Whirlwind and that ETH mixer.

The main point I noted apart from the OP is looking for investment, it is not a case of where people can send funds in one crypto and receive them in a different crypto after mixing.

That guy created eth mixer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458783.new#new

There has been some feedback regarding this where the viability of adding options such as ETH and XMR has been called in to question. If Whirlwind are going to push ahead with beta and then roll out the option, the dynamics of the service changes from exclusively a Bitcoin mixer to a mixer and exchange therefore this could be a first.

Any form of innovation in the crypto sphere is welcomed. We will be in a position to comment after the service is rolled out but if it helps with growth it probably will be accepted by the community.

It will say the page went down after saving my private key, and the next load, the key changed, while looking almost the same .....Another scam apologist, all of you are in on this SCAM...

Its a scamming ring at this point .. fools

As long as your posts/pages say “I didn’t save my private key”, which is what happened, I’m sure they’ll be fine. Even better that this will serve as a warning so their future users double check the basics before using the platform.