Topic: [ANN] Whirlwind.money | ⚡No Fee⚡ | Ultimate Privacy | Anonymity Mining 12% APR🔥 - page 19. (Read 12718 times)

SCAM APPOLOGIST

They will add more coins but wont add a "proceed to withdraw" button after your deposit arrives.

I for one am excited about the addition of ETH and XMR! Should be some good times ahead and hopefully some faster growth comes with it, too.

Yes i have an alt account, but using that is equal to doxing. If i get back on my feet financially and my money wasnt refunded.. whirlwind will have to get a new name and relaunch because i'll make sure the keyword "whirlwindmoney scam" on google wont be returnig empty results like it is right now.

I do hope so.. but if this happened with me I'd phuck them up right away won't have the patience he have. I don't like to see people act like angels while they enforce something that is not good. Also if someone in his shoe I would strongly support him if he comment from alts. Nothing is wrong in that. What is truly wrong what you all do.

If this happened with a famous member here they would have been licking his balls while resolving his issue.

You seem to be quickly converting from Islam to Hinduism with karma, but religion won't help anyone in this case
All of the sudden you are coming here supporting member stormbounty, and doing anti-campaigning for whirlwind makes me think you could easily be an altaccount, and this is obvious to everyone.

Can any of you shitty behavior apologists comment on this???


WHIRLWIND MONEY , REFUND MY $200, YOU HAD A DOWNTIME/HOSTING FLUCTUATIONS, ON YOUR WEBSITE YOU SAID NOT TO SHARE THE URL OR LETTER OF GUARANTEE THAT YOUR FUNDS CAN BE LOST, I HAVE BOTH , THE TAB IS STILL OPEN.

GIVE ME MY MONEYYYY

'


WELCOME TO PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY BITCOIN MIXER SCAM CLASS 101



STEP1 - BUILD BAD USER EXPERIENCE MIXER , AND USE A SHITTY HOSTING SERVER TO INCREASE CHANCES OF UPTIME FLUCTUATIONS AND AS A RESULT, USER MISTAKES

STEP2- TOTALLY IGNORE SUPPORT EMAILS SO USERS HAVE NO OPTION THAN TO COMPLAIN IN PUBLIC

STEP3- FARM ENGAGEMENT

STEP4- DENY FARMING ENGAGEMENT, GET OFFENDED BUT STILL CONTINUE TO FARM ENGAGEMENT TO ATTRACT MORE PEOPLE

STEP5- GATHER YOUR SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN FRIENDS TO DEFEND YOUR SHITTY UX MONEY PRINTER

STEP6- REPEAT CYCLE FROM STEP2 and never add that "PROCEED TO WITHDRAW" BUTTON after user deposits


GENIUS PLAN MATE

Your reply was posted 6 or 7 times

---

Can't stop laughing how many times will you post it
Darn karma hits hard

An old man taught me that years ago: "Bad advertising is still free advertising". I'll always remember it
You'd better keep your money for yourself. Feed your family, or buy toys for your kids, I'm sure they will enjoy

I find it so pathetic


In Islam, in Islam... I could also say a lot of stuff
If you start using religion, you're going to discredit yourself (no matter what the religion is)

edit:


CloudFlare
When I refreshed the page, it created a post, even I couldn't see the website


I admit, it was funny

When I have extra money (soon) I will send you $200 for a media package and have your story published on those media websites.

In islam making a contract that's against how the religion works does make the contract invalid.

Also, if the contract is valid but it doesn't affect you in giving someone his money back it remains Haram for you to keep it.

However, as loyce said they don't care.. and yes my comment was for you supporting them in the first place.

If we are to treat every internet app as a blank slate, the internet would be unusable, in this case, there are things expected, it will be a reflex action, two domains belonging to the same app should share sessions as long as its in same browser.. its just expected. You shouldnt have to login afresh to fb.me if you are already logged in on facebook.com! in the same browser
seconds apart .. come on man, Also why was there no proceed to withdrawal button after deposits came in.. its just standard practice that doesnt affect platform security!

This app is in beta, there should be no fixed , rigid af rules yet, thats the whole point of being in BETA.

If I build an app designed to be tricky and different from the norm so user funds get trapped, and i also use a fluctuating webhosting service that makes things hard to keep up, resulting in noobs making mistakes and losing their money, and i dont reply their support requests after 2 WHOLE WEEKS (not even a "we will get back to you" autorespoder),  am i a scammer or not?


I don't know another word to use that isnt as bad sounding as "scammer" , english is my third language so forgive my limited vocabulary, but you get the point.


The app UX IS HORRIBLE, AND THERE WAS DOWNTIME,, THERE WAS DOWNTIME YOU HEARTLESS, SOULESS SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN IDIOT

---

The app UX IS HORRIBLE, AND THERE WAS DOWNTIME,, THERE WAS DOWNTIME YOU HEARTLESS, SOULESS SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN IDIOT

---

What can of worms, cant you see the design is flawed, and there was DOWWWNNNTIMMMEEE

hmm, well, it does to me and probably to some others, but I am not sure how he relates religion to this issue, I believe his comment is directed at me.


This does not apply to the current situation, in all religions and cultures everything boils down to "agreements", you are making it seem like Whirlwind borrowed money from stormbounty and then refused to pay him back, this isn't the case at all.

stormbounty virtually signed an agreement/contract, before using the service he was made aware that if he loses his private key -- funds are gone, every case is different, and you can't put everything under a single term, if you really think Whirlwind must return the money to stormbounty then you are directly accusing them of scam.



This isn't a transaction by mistake, unrelated.

Bitcoin is not a bank, the closest thing to a bank would be losing your signature, imagine a bank with no KYC, no ID/password is required to open a bank account, and all you need to provide at the time of deposit is a signature, you can't withdraw anything unless you provide that hand signature, so you cash-in some money and then forget your signature, you walk to the bank and expect them to hear your story of how you forget your signature or how you cut your fingers by mistake.

The bank may or may not attempt to help you based on their rules/mood, but the sure thing is, they are under no obligation to do so.


The mixer did not eat the food, they didn't throw it in the garbage, they left it there, the neighbor is welcome to come get it whenever they bring the receipt, you are right in only one situation ( the mixer spends that money), then everything changes, but as long as the BTC still sits there -- they have done nothing wrong as far as morals and religion are concerned.

I am unsure exactly what that guy (stormbounty) intends to do because his options are limited. On the basis he did not keep a copy of his private key he has only himself to blame for his predicament.

Whirlwind will not pay him anything because they did nothing wrong. Members here have decided to not support stormbounty because his incompetence led him to this situation.

Whirlwind have suggested that if he really believes he was scammed he can go to minerjones with his allegation, he is holding $40,000 in escrow. From my perspective what is clear is that not only is stormbounty not going to get funds he lost access to because of his incompetence he does not deserve to unless he finds his lost private key. I do have some sympathy towards him but that is about as far as it goes.

If you stand beside stormbounty in the mistaken belief he will get his funds from either Whirlwind or the escrow (minerjones) then you will be standing for an eternity. The only way stormbounty will receive his funds is if he manages to locate his private key and by what he has already told us that is an impossible task.

It's a waste of time.
We're going to have an endless discussion, with everything having to be repeated again and again in every cycle. That's boring.
I don't think there's anything left to say, honestly.


ha ha ha, you're too a cryptoracist? 

(note: I'm just teasing to joke)

I don't see any harm in trying out this system since the aim is to grow up the website. I'm trying to look at both sides.
If WW can prove me wrong with the time, I'll have no problem admitting it.

In that case I'd shut up and not waste my time discussing but I'll remain standing beside that guy until he gets his funds.

If everything is clear, I'd give it back.
Your analogy doesn't hold though: think of it as funding a Bitcoin address: nobody is going to give it back to you if you lost your private key.

No. I probably won't like what they're eating. Besides, what if someone's trying to poison the neighbours?
Seriously though: here, packages are delivered to the neighbours all the time. It's normal.

You know religion means nothing to the rest of us, right?

A side question for all people supporting no refunds. If someone received a transaction by wrong should he give it back to its owner or keep it? What do you do in daily life? If you received an upfront paid delivery while it was for your neighbor would you eat it because the delivery guy gave it to you by wrong while you know who owns it? I saw some Muslim comments that should be knowing this (Rasulullah SAW also reminded Muslims that indebted persons are tied to the repayment of their debts. An indebted person must settle his debts in his lifetime, because if he dies while still in debt, then his soul will be suspended until his debts are settled) and this applies for this situation.

TODAY IS A GOOD DAY TO TAKE VALUABLE UX FEEDBACK AND PLEASE RETURN MY FUNDS

Maxi here also, and eth hater by default.

But I can understand WW tactics, they are a business and they have to offer something more to their clients, and to be able to break completely the chain while doing a hoop on some other altcoin might sound appealing to enough users to be worth it.
Besides, they will find out themselves, if it's not working and not gaining traction at all they will simply drop and we will have BTC only again!


Echoing these concerns, at this point you're going to be more like a no-KYC CEX than a mixer, but I assume you thought of this at least one step further before you started working on it.

Using Monero should be fine since it is privacy coin by default, and it has nice volume on Bisq exchange, but I see no reason at all in using ethereum and similar shitcoins.

Wouldn't this be categorized as centralized exchange?
We already have options or that, and you could get in (bigger) trouble with authorities for doing that.
 
That can open whole new can of worms and you should expect much more complications, support questions and complains, if you decide to implement this change.
I would be careful with this, since attack vector is getting bigger also, as well as chance for more bugs is code.l

BETA dev that attacks feedback about cruel USER EXPERIENCE FLAWS… money thieving feature it seems , not a bug



It was not my mistake only, they had downtimes, if that was even real, ploys to steal user funds. You are a scam apologist , put me in the ignore list.