I'm currently running queue:1, expiry: 30, and scan-time: 30
Are these okay settings, or should I change something to reduce reject rate?
Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 229. (Read 554401 times)
February 27, 2014, 02:18:39 PM
February 27, 2014, 02:18:25 PM
Maybee those people with high reject rate try this for me
queue=0 (1)
scan-time=1 (60)
and expiry=1 (120)
and have a look to the new reject rate
some feedback would be nice
February 27, 2014, 01:12:05 PM
It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122
There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%.
Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings.
Ah, thanks terk. Thought something was missing with my calculations. Been a long week.
February 27, 2014, 01:05:30 PM
Yes i can do
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.
http://k-dev.net/cgminer/
--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.
Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.
You are right and it's even brighter if you think about that any Version greater than 3.7.2 does not support GPU-mining any longer
from this point of view it is a new version of cgminer.
But do not fight shadows.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/xintensity/
http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpu
Just for those to want more juice out of their cards.............
some inspiration: http://www.cgminer-config.com/index.php
Have a nice evening
February 27, 2014, 12:38:13 PM
I hope EU servers are gonna go up soon. Really enjoyed the pool so far, but past 2 days I've been getting 8-20% reject rates again, so I had to move onto another pool.
February 27, 2014, 11:58:08 AM
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about
over 20% of my total payout?
over 20% of my total payout?
Code:
You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC
It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122
There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%.
Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings.
February 27, 2014, 11:50:14 AM
Little disappointed that we fell below 0.01/MH ... Waffle stayed a lot closer to 0.01. But I have faith in Terk!
Well, even DOGE, MINT and LEAF are at 115% LTC....
It should be better once all backend stuff is sorted out
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about
over 20% of my total payout?
over 20% of my total payout?
Code:
You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC
ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya
Give us full transaction hash or your address...
February 27, 2014, 11:47:37 AM
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about
over 20% of my total payout?
over 20% of my total payout?
Code:
You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC
ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya
February 27, 2014, 11:38:44 AM
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about
over 20% of my total payout?
over 20% of my total payout?
Code:
You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC
February 27, 2014, 10:48:54 AM
--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.
Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.
Yeah. Should stick to common conventions to avoid confusion.
February 27, 2014, 10:45:18 AM
Yes i can do
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.
http://k-dev.net/cgminer/
--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.
If not aware, the most interesting development in cgminer forks for scrypt is happening HERE. With discussion HERE.
February 27, 2014, 10:42:03 AM
Yes i can do
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.
http://k-dev.net/cgminer/
--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.
Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.
February 27, 2014, 10:34:23 AM
Yes i can do
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.
http://k-dev.net/cgminer/
--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.
February 27, 2014, 10:29:25 AM
I run GUIMiner-Scrypt (trying to learn SGMiner atm). I was running the newest version out with the green and white icon. I have noticed the stales I produce far out weigh the accepted I have been getting for the last 21 days or so. This is only an issue on my 280x's and 290's. 1 5870 and 1 6970 both run fine with the newer version. I tried dropping intensity down, overclocks down and everything else I could think of.
I have been testing an older version I had on a flash drive from about a year ago for about 2 hours. The orange icon one. My stale numbers have dropped signifcantly so far. I am going to run over night this way to verify.
Does anyone else use GUIMiner or is it pretty much just me? If so, which version do you use and what cards and accepted/stale ratios do you get? I'd be interested to see if anyone else has this issue and if this is a solid fix for it.
Keep up the great work Terk! Remember; haters gonna hate!
Off to bed. My Norco is making me loopy (maybe that's why SGMiner isn't making any sense tonight)
And if anyone is interested - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5392264
I have been testing an older version I had on a flash drive from about a year ago for about 2 hours. The orange icon one. My stale numbers have dropped signifcantly so far. I am going to run over night this way to verify.
Does anyone else use GUIMiner or is it pretty much just me? If so, which version do you use and what cards and accepted/stale ratios do you get? I'd be interested to see if anyone else has this issue and if this is a solid fix for it.
Keep up the great work Terk! Remember; haters gonna hate!
Off to bed. My Norco is making me loopy (maybe that's why SGMiner isn't making any sense tonight)And if anyone is interested - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5392264
so after a 14 hour test run I can report, so far, my stale rate went from over 55% down to 7-9% inside of GUIMiner. Also, my estimated payout showing on clevermining is substantially higher than it usually is at this time of day. To be honest, what it is at now is what I have been making all day and I am actually down 1 r9 290 atm (down 830kh/s). So switch to the older orange version and see if this helps you. I cannot find a version number anywhere in the folder it is located in so I am not sure how to identify it other than the icon color.
Happy hunting!
February 27, 2014, 10:29:20 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
10% rejectrate with 0.01btc/mh/day
1.5% rejectrate with 0.006/7btc/mh/day
allergic for rejects?
February 27, 2014, 10:16:42 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
payout is what counts ;-)
Yeah well if you can make 10% more b/c 10% your hash is wasted. So..who wins there? Terk.
this is not the point: if I get more btc on clevermining with 10% rejects than on middlecoin with 1% rejects, where should I mine?
also high rejects may not always be fixable: it may depend on the coin mined.
February 27, 2014, 10:13:36 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
payout is what counts ;-)
Yeah well if you can make 10% more b/c 10% your hash is wasted. So..who wins there? Terk.
February 27, 2014, 10:04:45 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
if you bothered to read you would see that terk is trying his best, but as he's on his own there are somethings that are on the to do list and will remain there for some time.
February 27, 2014, 09:56:16 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
payout is what counts ;-)
February 27, 2014, 09:53:54 AM
Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.
Jump to: