Topic: [ANN]BANKERA – Building the Bank for the Blockchain Era - page 338. (Read 185959 times)
They are licensed in Lithuania.
8.2 of your whitepaper states that you are paying token holders dividends.
If you are paying dividends to the token holders you are classified as a "security" in the eyes of the SEC.
Would you care to comment?
If you are paying dividends to the token holders you are classified as a "security" in the eyes of the SEC.
Would you care to comment?
It is strange, how people with 4 days old accounts accuses us of scam and after authors of accusations disappear, new users are raising these issues again.
More strange is the fact, that nearly none of our clients complain about failures of our IT system or lags in loading of cards or withdrawals, because it never happens, as we try provide high quality service to our clients.
For me spectrocoin and team is legit,and you play casisnos to much,paypal is scam,google is scam,there are icos where everything is wonderful,only post how much token will be,no fud,after ico is only patience and patience.There is no hype trolls here
Looks like Nigiria scam,200000$ on casino slots,looks like you are owner of some oil fields
More strange is the fact, that nearly none of our clients complain about failures of our IT system or lags in loading of cards or withdrawals, because it never happens, as we try provide high quality service to our clients.
For me spectrocoin and team is legit,and you play casisnos to much,paypal is scam,google is scam,there are icos where everything is wonderful,only post how much token will be,no fud,after ico is only patience and patience.There is no hype trolls here
Looks like Nigiria scam,200000$ on casino slots,looks like you are owner of some oil fields
I am interested in investing in Bankera, but i am now developing a cold feet.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
I am using Spectrocoin from long time,i am using his visa cards from his card provider mychoice,i have cards attached to paypal and skrill,you can transfer fiat from and to nettaller and skrill,you cant get working visa card from scam company.And that scam thread appear one day before ico,you cant find anything negative about spectro from previous time
Just to let you know, I play slots on betcoin.ag with amounts like 0.2 to 1 btc, I have never played with amount more than 50 BTC , but the people who had played had never got their money withdrawal from there...This trait is called selective scamming.
Spectrocoin and et al have been doing the same...They will surely pay you 200-1200..3000$ but will eventually scam you once you have riaked enough amount which they can't resist the temptation of.
I am interested in investing in Bankera, but i am now developing a cold feet.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
Just came here after reading the scam system developed by the Lithuania scammer vyustuk , this is the shame on the fate of digital system where scammers are looting people's retirement money and still have guts to stand in public and start another scam project.Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
Same on these figures...Both CEO and CCO and all the supporters.
If anyone wants to take legal action in Nairobi and it's neighbouring country contact me, I will help you.
I am interested in investing in Bankera, but i am now developing a cold feet.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
I am using Spectrocoin from long time,i am using his visa cards from his card provider mychoice,i have cards attached to paypal and skrill,you can transfer fiat from and to nettaller and skrill,you cant get working visa card from scam company.And that scam thread appear one day before ico,you cant find anything negative about spectro from previous time
I am interested in investing in Bankera, but i am now developing a cold feet.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
Can someone please explain this to me;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
and this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vytautask-317543
I am now skeptical about this project that i have been waiting for to invest in.
What is the recommended gas limit and price?
means this project offers loans for individuals to help if in a state of distress but I feel a little hesitant because credit cards are made later and what kind of funds need maximum how much I need to consider from now. hopefully nothing bad will happen later.
It's kind of early to eat those "bankera-mushrooms", don't you think
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankera
means this project offers loans for individuals to help if in a state of distress but I feel a little hesitant because credit cards are made later and what kind of funds need maximum how much I need to consider from now. hopefully nothing bad will happen later.
Not just loans. Also IBANs and debit cards. 
means this project offers loans for individuals to help if in a state of distress but I feel a little hesitant because credit cards are made later and what kind of funds need maximum how much I need to consider from now. hopefully nothing bad will happen later.
This is the Bankera ICO thread.
Skin Coin? I think you posted on the wrong thread
I think it will become a huge currency.
I'm sure this is because people need different things.
It seems that SkinCoin is succeeding enough in the future.
I'm sure this is because people need different things.
It seems that SkinCoin is succeeding enough in the future.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Not sure if this is related but a Lithuanian, with the same name, was sentenced to prison earlier because he: "...committed various fraudulent offences ...three counts of cheating, suppression of documents and false accounting ... the applicant was arrested in Moscow on an extradition request by the Lithuanian authorities."
Source: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=865243&Site=COE&direct=true
Bankera was established by the creator of spectrocoin scam Vytautas Karalevičius.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-scam-spectrocoincom-stay-away-from-spectrocoin-shady-company-1515839
https://forum.bitcoin.com/scam-accusations/spectrocoin-scam-of-100-bitcoin-t7310.html
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-scam-spectrocoincom-stay-away-from-spectrocoin-shady-company-1515839
https://forum.bitcoin.com/scam-accusations/spectrocoin-scam-of-100-bitcoin-t7310.html
Scam Alert:
Bankera.com is a scam by serial scammer VytautasK.
Check Here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
Bankera.com is a scam by serial scammer VytautasK.
Check Here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankera-scam-project-by-vytautas-karaleviius-mantas-mockeviius-2126829
I'm trying to understand the #s, this is what I'm currently calculating according to the whitepaper:
my understanding of the token supply is about 17,500,000,000 after SCO probably a little less. I'll round it off to an even 17,000,000,000
so in 10 years whitepaper suggest 500M in revenue. Token holders would be allotted 100M of that, split amongst 17,000,000,000 comes out to about .0059 eur which is less than ICO price....I'm hoping I'm doing the math wrong somewhere, because it doesn't sound that enticing for it to take 10 years for the profit share to get to .0059 eur...If this math is correct, the ICO price seems a bit high to me.
While I do like the pro-rata distribution in the event the ICO doesn't sell out, is an SCO really needed thereafter in that circumstance? Why dilute the token supply even further if the ICO didn't sell out? Are there scenarios where the SCO idea gets scrapped and those tokens get burned?
Generally I speaking, I like Bankera, I'm just having a hard time digesting the ICO price considering the token supply and the revenue projections.
my understanding of the token supply is about 17,500,000,000 after SCO probably a little less. I'll round it off to an even 17,000,000,000
so in 10 years whitepaper suggest 500M in revenue. Token holders would be allotted 100M of that, split amongst 17,000,000,000 comes out to about .0059 eur which is less than ICO price....I'm hoping I'm doing the math wrong somewhere, because it doesn't sound that enticing for it to take 10 years for the profit share to get to .0059 eur...If this math is correct, the ICO price seems a bit high to me.
While I do like the pro-rata distribution in the event the ICO doesn't sell out, is an SCO really needed thereafter in that circumstance? Why dilute the token supply even further if the ICO didn't sell out? Are there scenarios where the SCO idea gets scrapped and those tokens get burned?
Generally I speaking, I like Bankera, I'm just having a hard time digesting the ICO price considering the token supply and the revenue projections.
Finally, the Bankera's smart contract will distribute funds (Ether and XEM) to the holders of Banker (ERC20 and NEM mosaic) tokens pro-rata. For example, if there are 50,000,000,000 BNK tokens available in total and you have 1,000,000 BNK you will receive cryptocurrency in a value of around 40 EUR.
source http://bankera.com/?gclid=COOUpvea9dUCFUeLsgodd3EI2Q
Banking licence doesnt cost hundred mln of euro,dollar
In Poland Lithuania neighbour you need only around 125000 start up capital to open bank
Not sure what you're referring to, the pro-rata I was referring to was the one in the event the ICO doesn't sell out. According to white paper, those excess tokens would get split up pro-rata to ICO/pre-ico investors.
But that wasn't even my main pt. How is the ICO price justified based on the #s?
Please check your facts, this is not true: "In Poland Lithuania neighbour you need only around 125000 start up capital to open bank".
I personally not value Lithuanian Bank license very high. There are some banana-republics that have more credibility than Lithuania which is below Botswana, Saint Lucia, Cape Verde and the Dominican Republic in last year's global corruption rank.
Just that you know, across the European Union, authorised small specialist banks, have to meet the definition and hold an absolute minimum amount of capital equal to €5m or £5m (whichever is higher), plus a capital planning buffer. Once capital resources exceed €5 million it ceases to be a specialist bank and Bankera would therefore not qualify for being a specialist bank.
Why can't you answer my earlier simple question???
Bankera is looking to raise a lot of money, but it cannot use it for the purpose it claims. How will this work, because the CET1 capital requirements are against equity and Bankera ICO is not about equity, hence it cannot use the proceeds for the purpose it claims. This is very confusing.
Something does not add up here folks.
I personally not value Lithuanian Bank license very high. There are some banana-republics that have more credibility than Lithuania which is below Botswana, Saint Lucia, Cape Verde and the Dominican Republic in last year's global corruption rank.
Just that you know, across the European Union, authorised small specialist banks, have to meet the definition and hold an absolute minimum amount of capital equal to €5m or £5m (whichever is higher), plus a capital planning buffer. Once capital resources exceed €5 million it ceases to be a specialist bank and Bankera would therefore not qualify for being a specialist bank.
Why can't you answer my earlier simple question???
Bankera is looking to raise a lot of money, but it cannot use it for the purpose it claims. How will this work, because the CET1 capital requirements are against equity and Bankera ICO is not about equity, hence it cannot use the proceeds for the purpose it claims. This is very confusing.
Something does not add up here folks.
We already have a partnership with licensed Australian lender spotterloans.com.au to assist us with lending activity, we also have invested in an European PSP which is our partner. We have not stated anywhere what we are going to apply for a license in Lithuania, it still depends on many issues such as our capital size etc. The minimum amount of capital is a minimum, so the actual capital has to be higher as if bank's capital falls below minimum requirement the bank might be liquidated.
I am not sure what you do not understand, but Bankera ICO is conducted to build equity capital, so it add ups pretty straightforward.
Okay, I now understand your reply. I was just listing the ICOs on my signature, and will change the wording because if they won't get a banking license is better to represent them as they are.
Jump to: