I'm trying to understand the #s, this is what I'm currently calculating according to the whitepaper:
my understanding of the token supply is about 17,500,000,000 after SCO probably a little less. I'll round it off to an even 17,000,000,000
so in 10 years whitepaper suggest 500M in revenue. Token holders would be allotted 100M of that, split amongst 17,000,000,000 comes out to about .0059 eur which is less than ICO price....I'm hoping I'm doing the math wrong somewhere, because it doesn't sound that enticing for it to take 10 years for the profit share to get to .0059 eur...If this math is correct, the ICO price seems a bit high to me.
While I do like the pro-rata distribution in the event the ICO doesn't sell out, is an SCO really needed thereafter in that circumstance? Why dilute the token supply even further if the ICO didn't sell out? Are there scenarios where the SCO idea gets scrapped and those tokens get burned?
Generally I speaking, I like Bankera, I'm just having a hard time digesting the ICO price considering the token supply and the revenue projections.
Finally, the Bankera's smart contract will distribute funds (Ether and XEM) to the holders of Banker (ERC20 and NEM mosaic) tokens pro-rata. For example, if there are 50,000,000,000 BNK tokens available in total and you have 1,000,000 BNK you will receive cryptocurrency in a value of around 40 EUR.
source
http://bankera.com/?gclid=COOUpvea9dUCFUeLsgodd3EI2QBanking licence doesnt cost hundred mln of euro,dollar
In Poland Lithuania neighbour you need only around 125000 start up capital to open bank