This project has been ongoing for more than a year now. Any links to the github?
-bitblaster
Right, I've been watching this thread too for the same length of time. The sad part is after all the waiting I half expect this to be a clone of NANO, IOTA or Byteball. Prove me wrong.
Where it's a clone our not, there should be more information by now. DAG technology implementation should not take this long. Hiring a marketing team without a product is funny.
-bitblaster
Another DAG scam ICO? Watch out, guys! There are some people who have been serial DAG ICO scammers.
I believe this project is very different. Also this project started 1 year ago not like the other (STONE, ...)
However other projects proved after year some results, until this project shows that have something done, it's just....
Hi All quoted above,
After watching your posts exchange I feel I should also comment. Not excuse, comment - note it.
So:
@bitblaster -
DAG isn't a technology. It's a graph. Directed acyclic graph. All types of data representations that ensure timed sequence of data entries and exclude looping back are DAG. Our Universe is DAG based (cause-effect, one way entropy). Bitlattice can be represented as DAG as well. Difficulty of DAG implementation varies - it can have even less than 100 slocs (depending on language), but not sure in how many slocs our reality is implemented in.
The above are basics. Let's go deeper. Every coin around is DAG based. Simple blockchain as well (a constrained one, but still DAG). IOTA, Hashgraph and others exploit DAG scheme further allowing more parent and child nodes. But their innovation isn't in pushing limits of DAG - as it has precisely defined limits. They attempt to entangle data portions in a way that ensures correct order. And here is actual difficulty - in inventing a system that mimics cause and effect in best possible way (that no loop can occur /loop could be double spending for instance/).
So, @bitblaster, it's not easy and can take long. Depending what other guards and features you'd like to have.
As to marketing guy - FYI, he volunteered. And we are far enough to need to have him aboard.
@andreibi -
We'll prove you wrong. It was meant to be different from the beginning.
@cchub -
We stated before and I'll emphasize it now that we have funds secured. More, while we may have an ICO just to popularize the idea (I have ambigous feelings with respect to ICOs at all), the moment we'll start any funds collection will be after a functional prototype and WP gets published. Not before. I hope it's clear and I won't have to repeat it in capitals.
@Sam123 -
It's very different. Not only with respect to the scheme under the hood.
@Black_bl -
[...]it's just.... another project you can watch or not, as you neither lose nor risk anything.
As an update - we build now a network stack. This must be done with care as one of features of Bitlattice needs to be initiated in controlled manner.
BR,
H
P.S. We'll publish sources on GitLab, not Github. And we'll update here when it's published.
