[ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 227.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: CraigsCoin on November 12, 2014, 11:48:22 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:41:18 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:25:10 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:21:02 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

Only text is stored. Bloat becomes an issue as a long-term solution, however the tech is already there. Why develop new from scratch if you can develop the existing one?

Good question, but it's not one I can answer since I'm not XC's dev and I also know nothing about Craigscoin. There are innumerable variables that could affect such a decision.

Will you ask the Craigscoin people to consider joining the Blocknet?

Hello. I am CraigsCoin dev. Please allow me a few words about content stored in blockchain. I understand that blockchain is not suppose to store large amounts of date, but it still can store small text messages and links. Basically what CraigsCoin does - it allows every user to post short advertising message that will be stored within blockchain and can be viewed via online listing service. (see example at list.craigscoin.info). The message maximum length is not that big and will not have serious impact on the blockchain (in fact normal transactions will probably still fill 90% of the blockchain volume). Basically it is CraigsList packed in Blockchain. Anybody anywhere can use open-source web service to bring up local ad board, that is fully decentralized and absolutely can not be affected by any local laws or regulations. If your site taken down - someone else will bring up other. Or site owner can modify website to show only specific ads (for example only show ads from certain category).

And the best part - the coin is 100% functional. The listing site is 100% open source and there is API that can be used by 3d party devs.

would love to see this on blocknet, PLUS the XC content delivery approach and many other, let the net grow

CraigsCoin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

CraigsCoin Dev

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:41:18 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:25:10 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:21:02 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

Only text is stored. Bloat becomes an issue as a long-term solution, however the tech is already there. Why develop new from scratch if you can develop the existing one?

Good question, but it's not one I can answer since I'm not XC's dev and I also know nothing about Craigscoin. There are innumerable variables that could affect such a decision.

Will you ask the Craigscoin people to consider joining the Blocknet?

Hello. I am CraigsCoin dev. Please allow me a few words about content stored in blockchain. I understand that blockchain is not suppose to store large amounts of data, but it still can store small text messages and links. Basically what CraigsCoin does - it allows every user to post short advertising message that will be stored within blockchain and can be viewed via online listing service. (see example at www.list.craigscoin.info). The message maximum length is not that big and will not have serious impact on the blockchain (in fact normal transactions will probably still fill 90% of the blockchain volume). Basically it is CraigsList packed in Blockchain. Anybody anywhere can use open-source web service to bring up local ad board, that is fully decentralized and absolutely can not be affected by any local laws or regulations. If your site taken down - someone else will bring up other. Or site owner can modify website to show only specific ads (for example only show ads from certain category, or language or location).

And the best part - the coin is 100% functional. The listing site is 100% open source and there is API that can be used by 3d party devs.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:41:18 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:25:10 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:21:02 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

Only text is stored. Bloat becomes an issue as a long-term solution, however the tech is already there. Why develop new from scratch if you can develop the existing one?

Good question, but it's not one I can answer since I'm not XC's dev and I also know nothing about Craigscoin. There are innumerable variables that could affect such a decision.

Will you ask the Craigscoin people to consider joining the Blocknet?

because competition fuels innovation. i would love to see craigscoin on blocknet and other similar ideas competing against each other. the xbridge will be open source anyway so its craigscoins and any other cois decision some point down the road to join or not . only the foundation spot will remain to be voted on.
i think you don't fully get what the blocknet is meant to be when its up and running . there won't be a one solution for every problem type coin conglomerate. the foundation will probably look like that and thats good. but every coin will have a shot at offering his service on blocknet and by so , if succesfull, probably gaining a foundation seat.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:25:10 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:21:02 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

Only text is stored. Bloat becomes an issue as a long-term solution, however the tech is already there. Why develop new from scratch if you can develop the existing one?

Good question, but it's not one I can answer since I'm not XC's dev and I also know nothing about Craigscoin. There are innumerable variables that could affect such a decision.

Will you ask the Craigscoin people to consider joining the Blocknet?

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:19:04 AM

Quote from: cryptico on November 12, 2014, 10:14:47 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

So Is it web 3.0 coming before ReV3 Arlyn? Do not over promise please. We are still waiting for Rev2.5.

As far as I'm aware this is the plan.

Be aware though that it is not "web 3.0" in total, it's a distributed content server, which is a web 3.0 concept. It'll be years before the internet in general becomes "web 3.0."

(Also, bear in mind the difference between "promises" (i.e. firm commitments) and prospective outlooks ("should", "probably", etc.), and try to keep your expectations in proportion to them. I know you're very keen to see new XC tech - and that's great - but you run the risk of frustrating yourself needlessly.)

Distribute content server would be great to start to market Xmixers what XC already have and what should have been the biggest selling point if they would have brought revenue. we already have Xmixer technology that can bring in fees and this would be a great incentive for people to get Xmixers.

I know you have an Insider view on development and maybe you are not concerned the fact is that from the outside everything that we see it is a bit messy and I was expecting some tech released for XC and as well a clear date for Rev2.5. Lately it seems that Dan is developing things further away from the timeline and not focusing on deliver what was expected but I understand that he has reasons to do so. It seems you want to get into too many stuff toghether and want to release everything toghether.

Before till Xmixer release the releases where much more in line with the timeline and there were not so many underdelivered announcements. I think you should talk toghether and reconsider to rebuilt a new timeline stick to it with reasonable dates till Rev 3 and Deliver. Do not let Dan roam loose releasing random updates and making announcements that then he cannot fulfill it looks messy and it is frustrating to witness.

Revelation

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:21:02 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

Only text is stored. Bloat becomes an issue as a long-term solution, however the tech is already there. Why develop new from scratch if you can develop the existing one?

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 10:16:14 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

Maybe. I don't know...

That doesn't sound like a good idea though. A blockchain is not the sort of thing to store content. Imagine the bloat!

Content should be indexed in the blockchain and stored, encrypted, on the local storage accessible to multiple nodes in such a way that not even the nodes know what they're storing.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: cryptico on November 12, 2014, 10:14:47 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

So Is it web 3.0 coming before ReV3 Arlyn? Do not over promise please. We are still waiting for Rev2.5.

As far as I'm aware this is the plan.

Be aware though that it is not "web 3.0" in total, it's a distributed content server, which is a web 3.0 concept. It'll be years before the internet in general becomes "web 3.0."

(Also, bear in mind the difference between "promises" (i.e. firm commitments) and prospective outlooks ("should", "probably", etc.), and try to keep your expectations in proportion to them. I know you're very keen to see new XC tech - and that's great - but you run the risk of frustrating yourself needlessly.)

Revelation

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

Ads in the blockchain has been developed by CraigsCoin. Why don't you add it to the BlockNet?

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Oldminer on November 12, 2014, 07:03:17 AM

No, I'm asking, why are people selling below cost? Is it a lack of confidence in Blocknet?

LOLZ

Popcorn in here this morning!

You're a hero member, Oldminer, and you're asking why people are selling below cost? This can't be your first rodeo.

I'd say it has nothing to with the level of confidence in BlockNET.

Take me for example.

I bought a fair amount of BLOCK during the ITO as an investor because I value the project and wanted to facilitate its development. The only way I could help ensure BlockNET's development was to buy during the ITO and so I did.

After the ITO ended and trading began, I put my trader hat on.

And with my trader hat on, I recognized that almost all ITOs fall below ITO price at some point - most right away, sometimes others rise first on hype, then fall. BlockNET did not have much hype behind it after the ITO and so I dumped without much regard for my initial investment.

The post-ITO dump is for accumulation after all and that is what I and I'm sure others are doing as we wait for development to pick up the pace. I've now both supported development by participating in the ITO and I've also accumulated 30% more tokens trading through the dumps.

Now, y'all, quit bickering about the price. I'm almost out of popcorn.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

So Is it web 3.0 coming before ReV3 Arlyn? Do not over promise please. We are still waiting for Rev2.5.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

Yes, XC's thread is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcxcurrency-decentralised-trustless-privacy-platform-encrypted-xchat-pos-630547

And the press release on the distributed content server is here: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-08-22%20XC%20pioneers%20Web%203.0%20with%20blockchain-based%20content%20delivery.pdf

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:11:11 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

http://xc-official.com/xc-pioneers-web-3.0-with-blockchain-based-content-delivery.html

dan7777777

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 10:03:02 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

Great. Is there a thread here where I can read up on xc and web 3.0 a bit more?

G-Bert

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on November 12, 2014, 09:57:13 AM

Is there anyone in Here from the other coins communities? I'm seeing just XC and Fibre people...mainly XC.

I would like to know a bit more why they support their coin that is in the block-net and what is their selling point and what they bring to market.

thx

Very good point!

I see very little from any other community in here.

I'd also like to know what the other coins are doing to contribute to blocknet & its development.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

dan7777777

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 08:49:48 AM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 07:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 07:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Is there anyone in Here from the other coins communities? I'm seeing just XC and Fibre people...mainly XC.

I would like to know a bit more why they support their coin that is in the block-net and what is their selling point and what they bring to market.

thx

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

hashtag101, you're just shouting at people.

When you start joining in a conversation - and doing so in a manner that respects the perspective of others - then you'll be welcome here.

For now, you are banned

Edit: same goes for you BlackWidow. Go create another newbie account.
Edit: Revelation, I said that the discussion is over. You shifted the goalposts and that's the end of it. I'm not willing to continue the discussion. If you would like to resume our other discussion (in that FUD thread) by supplying a single reason why you think I'm unethical, then do so. But we're done here.

Revelation

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 08:48:05 AM

Quote from: Revelation on November 12, 2014, 08:39:05 AM

I am not disposed negatively toward you, however it bothers me how you are using ethics in defending your position or accusing others and yet at the same time you refuse to acknowledge that you are not making ethical claims.
You were claiming that one cannot say "the market price has dropped" because on Bter the ask price is high. These type of claims are bothersome.

You just changed your argument from:

"Synechist is unethically using Bter to quote the market price"

to:

"Synechist is bothersomely quoting Bter to argue against claims that the market price has dropped a lot."

You just shifted the goalposts. You saw that your line of argument has insufficient basis and then tried to switch to another line of attack.

That's game over in my favour. End of discussion.

Now if you'd kindly go to that FUD thread and supply some reasons why you think I'm unethical, perhaps there'll be grounds to pursue discussion with you. But for the time being, there aren't.

Common, are you really serious? I am saying that you cannot use Bter at all to make any price claims, regardless of what the claims are. I used market price as an example, whereas your claim was about price drop. To me there isn't much difference, both claims are about market price and it is not ethical to use Bter at all in these discussions.
Moreover, what I am saying is not about the success of the project, therefore it cannot constitute FUD. Stop making false accusations and please stop using the word ethics.

Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 227. (Read 1103293 times)