Author

Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 380. (Read 1201691 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1240



OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed?

OC SUPRNOVA  Still having issues. If I still have them I'll add -s 2 to my bat file if that would help....but was working great 2 days ago.



Stilll looks ok, a few duplicates are totally normal, I have that too.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Problem gone after  i deleted "--no-submit-stale --scan-time 2 --queue 0" parameters, rejects ratio less then %0.5 ...
hero member
Activity: 843
Merit: 1004
is there an idiots guide to running PoS? what is the stake rate?
thanks

+1, I was thinking there will be a web staking wallet or pool already  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
I would not be shocked if the first Blake256 ASICS to be developed and released due to DCR
Could be...low on memory demand.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
I would not be shocked if the first Blake256 ASICS to be developed and released due to DCR
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed?

OC SUPRNOVA  Still having issues. If I still have them I'll add -s 2 to my bat file if that would help....but was working great 2 days ago.

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
is there an idiots guide to running PoS? what is the stake rate?
thanks
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
I have still same too much rejects,tried with different diff.



Uh time-too-new is the old bug of the first cgminer versions. Make sure you use the latest version from the decred github releases

Yeah new cgminer fixed it, but at this time what's this?it's look lile poolside error.


Did you try a higher diff port ? Looks like the pool isn't providing the work fast enough, yep.

Try adding the following parameters to your launcher (or .bat)
--no-submit-stale --scan-time 2 --queue 0
Already i had this parameter in my bat file.
sr. member
Activity: 452
Merit: 251
I don't think so, as far as I can tell this coin has the best/solid dev team in the business. Decred might be the true  bitcoin alternative we've all been waiting for.
I hope you are correct. I just think this dev team should have tried to apply the KISS principle to some of this. The fact that they have failed to apply KISS gives me doubts for wide adoption. Some of this stuff is rather convoluted.

This is not an unfair point. It's important to remember that new technology is often complex. You can look back at any technology in its infancy, and see the trouble with complexity. The irony of the pursuit of simplicity is that it's not simple to do. The active solution to making simple a complex technology is to make it a pursuit.

This is reflected in the RFP process. It begins with native GUIs (RFP-1), improving the light web GUI (RFP-2), and providing a simple overview of the network and its concepts (RFP-3). And then there's the stake pool, which makes the process simpler by circumventing the need to keep a wallet online 24/7, or even the requirement of a reliable Internet connection. Deconstructing these processes, it becomes apparent that simplicity is in fact a desire of the project's output - however, as said, it's not as simple as keeping it simple.
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 236
Updated the OP text to reflect the latest RFP. RFP-3 deals with visualizing the Decred network. If you know data, it is to port and build a network status dashboard. The next RFP will be for documentation and user guides. Then there will be an RFP for the miner devs. These all run in parallel.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
legendary
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
What is up with https://dcr.suprnova.cc/ looks like it may be having some issues

Its been that way for a few hours it seems, so you may want to have a look and decide what to do until the issue is resolved.

Cron was Stuck, fixed Smiley

Awesome, thank you for the quick fix and response!
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1240
What is up with https://dcr.suprnova.cc/ looks like it may be having some issues

Its been that way for a few hours it seems, so you may want to have a look and decide what to do until the issue is resolved.

Cron was Stuck, fixed Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
What is up with https://dcr.suprnova.cc/ looks like it may be having some issues

Its been that way for a few hours it seems, so you may want to have a look and decide what to do until the issue is resolved.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Finished adding the other half of the block header not shown earlier to the output of the tests - putting in the final XOR with input block stage of Blake-256 that I forgot about when testing, in order to make it a full Decred process that will work, and porting tests to match. Also changed protocol to something more Icarus-like, in preparation for CGMiner support, and changed some stuff in the core transform, helping me drop slices, making the design smaller.

Previously, slice usage was ~1,300 out of the LX9's 1,430. Dropped it to 1,205 in this latest synthesis, but that isn't yet enough free logic to allow me to speed it up yet, I don't think.

Sounds promising, do you expect similar kind of speeds compared to other Blake algo coins on FPGA devices? I am also curious if you are using a more modern readily available FPGA device?

Backstory is, this implementation was done simply because people kept telling me it couldn't be - the current public implementation of Blake-256 takes up 16k slices on a Spartan-6 LX150 - so it was definitely impossible to fit on an LX9. So I did. Performance is not going to be good on the LX9, of course - I'm using a Mojo v3 for testing. The real chip design is in developement, on my SoCKit - details on it here: http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?Language=English&CategoryNo=165&No=816&PartNo=1 - for larger chips and targeting the most hashrate I can get out of it. It's got a Cyclone V FPGA and ARMv7 dual-core on the same chip, and 1GB of DDR3 connected to the ARMv7 side, with the other 1GB connected to the FPGA. It has TONS of wonderful things onboard to program - I've already played with the software side of it, compiling the kernel with Altera's patches, compiling the preloader and u-boot, and putting Arch Linux ARM on it - but now I'll be working with the FPGA more, and connecting the two together.

It can be a fully self-contained miner, too; here's just a short list of fun ideas I've had so far:
 - Using the onboard LCD to output hashrate
 - Reading temps off the sensor and displaying that
 - Connecting some of the buttons/switches to start/stop hashing
 - Lighting an LED when hashing is enabled and turning it off when disabled
 - LED flash on share found
 - Using hardware interrupts to notify the CPU of shares
 - Putting the ARMv7 into low-power mode while mining

The last two kind of help each other - you can signal an interrupt from the FPGA, and handle it in your own Linux kernel module, passing it to the userspace miner, and letting it check and submit, if need be. The advantage here is no need for polling, which reduces shit the CPU has to execute - add that to enabling the low-power state and it could be awesome.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
Darn, looks like the pump for this coin is in full throttle and I tied up most of my coins in purchasing tickets. Oh well, looks like I'll be sticking around with this coin for a while. Hope this doesn't fall apart in month or two like the vast majority of alts do.



I don't think so, as far as I can tell this coin has the best/solid dev team in the business. Decred might be the true  bitcoin alternative we've all been waiting for.

I hope you are correct. I just think this dev team should have tried to apply the KISS principle to some of this. The fact that they have failed to apply KISS gives me doubts for wide adoption. Some of this stuff is rather convoluted.

hero member
Activity: 774
Merit: 503
Darn, looks like the pump for this coin is in full throttle and I tied up most of my coins in purchasing tickets. Oh well, looks like I'll be sticking around with this coin for a while. Hope this doesn't fall apart in month or two like the vast majority of alts do.



I don't think so, as far as I can tell this coin has the best/solid dev team in the business. Decred might be the true  bitcoin alternative we've all been waiting for.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
Darn, looks like the pump for this coin is in full throttle and I tied up most of my coins in purchasing tickets. Oh well, looks like I'll be sticking around with this coin for a while. Hope this doesn't fall apart in month or two like the vast majority of alts do.

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Finished adding the other half of the block header not shown earlier to the output of the tests - putting in the final XOR with input block stage of Blake-256 that I forgot about when testing, in order to make it a full Decred process that will work, and porting tests to match. Also changed protocol to something more Icarus-like, in preparation for CGMiner support, and changed some stuff in the core transform, helping me drop slices, making the design smaller.

Previously, slice usage was ~1,300 out of the LX9's 1,430. Dropped it to 1,205 in this latest synthesis, but that isn't yet enough free logic to allow me to speed it up yet, I don't think.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed?
Jump to: