Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.
agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.
In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.
Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.
You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.
I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ?
Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps.
Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money.
The point is that rampant rewards campaigns, although in the long run bring in some investors, also cause big dumps and maybe even faster, the bonus is more efficient if applied intensive marketing, and attracts more investments in the short term, but also need control and caution
That's the least ICO teams should do: use vesting periods
