Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] LANEAXIS (U.S Patented): Blockchain Solution For Transportaion - page 54. (Read 115007 times)

newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
why would I need to buy AXIS tokens?
TRANSPORTATION EXPERIENCE - The LaneAxis platform was built by logistics veterans with decades of combined industry experience.


BLOCKCHAIN EXPERIENCE - Our blockchain engineering team is comprised of some of the most skilled and highly-regarded blockchain architects in the crypto space.
TRUE UTILITY TOKEN - The AXIS token is the key mechanism providing users independent access to all immutable data and business intelligence stored on the LaneAxis blockchain.
newbie
Activity: 111
Merit: 0
why would I need to buy AXIS tokens?
TRANSPORTATION EXPERIENCE - The LaneAxis platform was built by logistics veterans with decades of combined industry experience.


BLOCKCHAIN EXPERIENCE - Our blockchain engineering team is comprised of some of the most skilled and highly-regarded blockchain architects in the crypto space.
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
why would I need to buy AXIS tokens?
newbie
Activity: 310
Merit: 0
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.
It's true, but on the other hand there will be few participants in such a bounty program, and this action will be ineffective. I think that the best way when bounty budget somewhere in the middle.

Actually i am not sure about it.

Because i saw too many projects with smaller bounty budget and more people than huge bounty budgets. It is mostly about the bounty manager.

One thing that does speak for bounties, they DO create awareness and a bigger community.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 107
Yes a vesting period is also used sometime to avoid quick dump. But if the project has realy a good potential i think it’s not mandatory, the price will stay good if the possibiities of the project are good. So it depend a lot of the team.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.


I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later  ?

Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps.
Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit.

Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money.

The point is that rampant rewards campaigns, although in the long run bring in some investors, also cause big dumps and maybe even faster, the bonus is more efficient if applied intensive marketing, and attracts more investments in the short term, but also need control and caution
the bounty campaigns are used to better advertise the project, the various bonuses are used to encourage investors to invest more, to avoid the dumps team could block the token for a few months after the end of the ico (impossibility of moving once distributed)
This artificial stopping is letting me down sometimes as all dumps and falls are the inevitable things to happen in the market...
full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 159
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.


I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later  ?

Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps.
Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit.

Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money.

The point is that rampant rewards campaigns, although in the long run bring in some investors, also cause big dumps and maybe even faster, the bonus is more efficient if applied intensive marketing, and attracts more investments in the short term, but also need control and caution
the bounty campaigns are used to better advertise the project, the various bonuses are used to encourage investors to invest more, to avoid the dumps team could block the token for a few months after the end of the ico (impossibility of moving once distributed)
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 310
Everywhere i see the promotion about this project they are saying about this U.S. Patent. like this is the reason why we already should give them money ))

I think every investor should make the necessary DYOR before putting off some money in a project. And yes, having a patent proves only that this project is legit and has experience which makes it very advantageous over any other competitors.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 331
DAO MAKER
Everywhere i see the promotion about this project they are saying about this U.S. Patent. like this is the reason why we already should give them money ))
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
According to the website, Crypto Winter Bonus will be valid for 9 more days, so there's more time to invest with a nice bonus. I'm wondering why they decided to prolong it?
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
Does they have some conferences right now? I see that they had a lot events in April-May this year, but cant find current events...  Huh

https://www.laneaxis.io/?utm_source=turinglabs&utm_medium=BTTBNTY

Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May?
I guess they didn't update the webpage. I find hard to believe they have not ptake part inany event since then.
Participation in various crypto events would be very useful for the project - there you can get acquainted with investors, and find new partnerships.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
Or maybe they tried to get funded by venture capitalists but they failed at it, we will never know. For sure the easier way right now is trough an ICO / token generation event whatever you wanna call it

Yeah last year we have seen lots of projects funded themselves by icos after failing raising enough money for their investments.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Does they have some conferences right now? I see that they had a lot events in April-May this year, but cant find current events...  Huh

https://www.laneaxis.io/?utm_source=turinglabs&utm_medium=BTTBNTY

Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May?
I guess they didn't update the webpage. I find hard to believe they have not ptake part inany event since then.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
Does they have some conferences right now? I see that they had a lot events in April-May this year, but cant find current events...  Huh

https://www.laneaxis.io/?utm_source=turinglabs&utm_medium=BTTBNTY

Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May?
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 101
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.


I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later  ?

Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps.
Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit.

Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money.

do they have a bounty program that you know of?

No, I haven't checked for a bounty program. I was speaking in general.

ok, thanks for the reply
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
Or maybe they tried to get funded by venture capitalists but they failed at it, we will never know. For sure the easier way right now is trough an ICO / token generation event whatever you wanna call it
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I am not sure if there would even be a way to check this in any ico unless they want to be transparent about such things. But i don't think that even matters.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea.

Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves?

Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app
Yes, I think thay had this idea a long time ago and they have found in crypto the way to find the necesary funds.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 101
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea.

Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves?

Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app

I am not sure if there would even be a way to check this in any ico unless they want to be transparent about such things. But i don't think that even matters.

Edit* (i messed up the quotes)
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea.

Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves?

Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.
They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.


I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later  ?

Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps.
Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit.

Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money.

do they have a bounty program that you know of?

No, I haven't checked for a bounty program. I was speaking in general.
Pages:
Jump to: