[ANN][ICO] LANEAXIS (U.S Patented): Blockchain Solution For Transportaion - page 58.

PS92

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 101

Quote from: levyashin on October 02, 2018, 12:21:01 AM

Quote from: zgrdyg on October 01, 2018, 11:43:36 PM

Quote from: LastHiT on October 01, 2018, 06:26:57 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

In my opinion even %10 decrease in costs can have a huge positive impact for companies. with %30 decrease you can change the industry.

In every kind of business, you need less expenditure for a bigger profit. Even for %1 everyone would choose laneaxis.

1% means millions (company) of not billions (industry) of savings

Jorandck

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

I see Laneaxis supported by an experienced team..

nobytes

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 101

Quote from: loup on October 02, 2018, 06:49:16 AM

Quote from: ParRus on October 02, 2018, 06:30:33 AM

Quote from: lobat999 on October 02, 2018, 05:54:49 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on October 01, 2018, 05:52:46 PM

Quote from: belechau on October 01, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Quote from: aveon on October 01, 2018, 03:23:28 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will?

Do you mean someone who has tried to implement Blockchain to this service? Perhaps only indirect, traditional competitors have sought some means of eliminating intermediaries and freights, but I do not recall Blockchain's application that failed previously, but if there was, it is also not a negative point for Laneaxis

If this

"most still relying on archaic technologies, such as fax machines, phone calls, and paper processes to initiate, manage and track shipments."

is true, then there is certainly room to reduce overhead by adopting new technology. Is that new technology just blockchain? No, I do not think so. Blockchain is just one of the tools they have at their disposal. The blockchain hype wakes up dozed off management to determine whether their business processes are stuck in the past because "we have always done it that way".

Once rolled out, I guess this project's greatest advantage is to eliminate redundancies in manpower by automating some functions in work processes and that could bring a lot of savings to the company embracing it.

The technology is outdated in this segment, paperwork complicates the delivery process, I think now it's best time when blockchain technology can replace the current transportaion method.

I agree, I think that there's too much paperwork in this business and things could have been done in an easier way.

That brings this to my question; what are the paper pusher jobs that this platform disrupts exactly? I mean i like to invest in everything that makes old jobs outdated. Some may call that unethical but i call it progress and highly profitable. Tongue

Amelie Poulain

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

Quote from: loup on October 02, 2018, 06:49:16 AM

Quote from: ParRus on October 02, 2018, 06:30:33 AM

Quote from: lobat999 on October 02, 2018, 05:54:49 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on October 01, 2018, 05:52:46 PM

Quote from: belechau on October 01, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Quote from: aveon on October 01, 2018, 03:23:28 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will?

Do you mean someone who has tried to implement Blockchain to this service? Perhaps only indirect, traditional competitors have sought some means of eliminating intermediaries and freights, but I do not recall Blockchain's application that failed previously, but if there was, it is also not a negative point for Laneaxis

If this

"most still relying on archaic technologies, such as fax machines, phone calls, and paper processes to initiate, manage and track shipments."

is true, then there is certainly room to reduce overhead by adopting new technology. Is that new technology just blockchain? No, I do not think so. Blockchain is just one of the tools they have at their disposal. The blockchain hype wakes up dozed off management to determine whether their business processes are stuck in the past because "we have always done it that way".

Once rolled out, I guess this project's greatest advantage is to eliminate redundancies in manpower by automating some functions in work processes and that could bring a lot of savings to the company embracing it.

The technology is outdated in this segment, paperwork complicates the delivery process, I think now it's best time when blockchain technology can replace the current transportaion method.

I agree, I think that there's too much paperwork in this business and things could have been done in an easier way.

The only question is, can people massively understand and accept this new for them technology? Especially older people who are over 50+ years old would prefer their usual methods.

loup

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Quote from: ParRus on October 02, 2018, 06:30:33 AM

Quote from: lobat999 on October 02, 2018, 05:54:49 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on October 01, 2018, 05:52:46 PM

Quote from: belechau on October 01, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Quote from: aveon on October 01, 2018, 03:23:28 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will?

Do you mean someone who has tried to implement Blockchain to this service? Perhaps only indirect, traditional competitors have sought some means of eliminating intermediaries and freights, but I do not recall Blockchain's application that failed previously, but if there was, it is also not a negative point for Laneaxis

If this

"most still relying on archaic technologies, such as fax machines, phone calls, and paper processes to initiate, manage and track shipments."

is true, then there is certainly room to reduce overhead by adopting new technology. Is that new technology just blockchain? No, I do not think so. Blockchain is just one of the tools they have at their disposal. The blockchain hype wakes up dozed off management to determine whether their business processes are stuck in the past because "we have always done it that way".

Once rolled out, I guess this project's greatest advantage is to eliminate redundancies in manpower by automating some functions in work processes and that could bring a lot of savings to the company embracing it.

The technology is outdated in this segment, paperwork complicates the delivery process, I think now it's best time when blockchain technology can replace the current transportaion method.

I agree, I think that there's too much paperwork in this business and things could have been done in an easier way.

Xabier. Pineda

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

Solid investiment Kiss

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

Quote from: lobat999 on October 02, 2018, 05:54:49 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on October 01, 2018, 05:52:46 PM

Quote from: belechau on October 01, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Quote from: aveon on October 01, 2018, 03:23:28 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will?

Do you mean someone who has tried to implement Blockchain to this service? Perhaps only indirect, traditional competitors have sought some means of eliminating intermediaries and freights, but I do not recall Blockchain's application that failed previously, but if there was, it is also not a negative point for Laneaxis

If this

"most still relying on archaic technologies, such as fax machines, phone calls, and paper processes to initiate, manage and track shipments."

is true, then there is certainly room to reduce overhead by adopting new technology. Is that new technology just blockchain? No, I do not think so. Blockchain is just one of the tools they have at their disposal. The blockchain hype wakes up dozed off management to determine whether their business processes are stuck in the past because "we have always done it that way".

Once rolled out, I guess this project's greatest advantage is to eliminate redundancies in manpower by automating some functions in work processes and that could bring a lot of savings to the company embracing it.

The technology is outdated in this segment, paperwork complicates the delivery process, I think now it's best time when blockchain technology can replace the current transportaion method.

lobat999

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

Quote from: Rigorous on October 01, 2018, 05:52:46 PM

Quote from: belechau on October 01, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Quote from: aveon on October 01, 2018, 03:23:28 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will?

Do you mean someone who has tried to implement Blockchain to this service? Perhaps only indirect, traditional competitors have sought some means of eliminating intermediaries and freights, but I do not recall Blockchain's application that failed previously, but if there was, it is also not a negative point for Laneaxis

If this

"most still relying on archaic technologies, such as fax machines, phone calls, and paper processes to initiate, manage and track shipments."

is true, then there is certainly room to reduce overhead by adopting new technology. Is that new technology just blockchain? No, I do not think so. Blockchain is just one of the tools they have at their disposal. The blockchain hype wakes up dozed off management to determine whether their business processes are stuck in the past because "we have always done it that way".

Once rolled out, I guess this project's greatest advantage is to eliminate redundancies in manpower by automating some functions in work processes and that could bring a lot of savings to the company embracing it.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: wissy on October 02, 2018, 05:19:25 AM

Quote from: omwibya on October 02, 2018, 05:01:57 AM

Quote from: loup on October 01, 2018, 06:57:47 AM

Quote from: mr.robot8 on October 01, 2018, 06:52:22 AM

Quote from: lvsca on September 30, 2018, 11:37:29 PM

Quote from: pynetx on September 30, 2018, 10:42:38 PM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 30, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Not a fan of bonuses either but as far as I can see at least the tier system is purely time dependent and there is no minimum investment amount which would kill decentralization.

Do you know what is the bonus structure? Is there any minimum investment?

current bonus is 10% with $0.25/token. you need to do KYC/AML first to join this ICO.
i sign up to their ICO website for check this

the bonus seems good to me and also the current value of tokens, i do not really like the obligation of kyc but patience is the current trend of icos, which is the minimum necessary to invest? only eth and fiat?

KYC is not something that investors like to see but I think something like that would be necessary to legalize tokens.

that's the issue I really hate. crypto was supposed to be a getaway from government control and regulation.

I'm afraid governments can't allow that. But look at the bright side, more regulation means less scams.

Governments are making everything worse, aren't they?

Still, we are not in 2010 anymore. They have very tight regulations to obey.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: omwibya on October 02, 2018, 05:01:57 AM

Quote from: loup on October 01, 2018, 06:57:47 AM

Quote from: mr.robot8 on October 01, 2018, 06:52:22 AM

Quote from: lvsca on September 30, 2018, 11:37:29 PM

Quote from: pynetx on September 30, 2018, 10:42:38 PM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 30, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Not a fan of bonuses either but as far as I can see at least the tier system is purely time dependent and there is no minimum investment amount which would kill decentralization.

Do you know what is the bonus structure? Is there any minimum investment?

current bonus is 10% with $0.25/token. you need to do KYC/AML first to join this ICO.
i sign up to their ICO website for check this

the bonus seems good to me and also the current value of tokens, i do not really like the obligation of kyc but patience is the current trend of icos, which is the minimum necessary to invest? only eth and fiat?

KYC is not something that investors like to see but I think something like that would be necessary to legalize tokens.

that's the issue I really hate. crypto was supposed to be a getaway from government control and regulation.

I'm afraid governments can't allow that. But look at the bright side, more regulation means less scams.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: loup on October 01, 2018, 06:57:47 AM

Quote from: mr.robot8 on October 01, 2018, 06:52:22 AM

Quote from: lvsca on September 30, 2018, 11:37:29 PM

Quote from: pynetx on September 30, 2018, 10:42:38 PM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 30, 2018, 05:02:05 PM

Not a fan of bonuses either but as far as I can see at least the tier system is purely time dependent and there is no minimum investment amount which would kill decentralization.

Do you know what is the bonus structure? Is there any minimum investment?

current bonus is 10% with $0.25/token. you need to do KYC/AML first to join this ICO.
i sign up to their ICO website for check this

the bonus seems good to me and also the current value of tokens, i do not really like the obligation of kyc but patience is the current trend of icos, which is the minimum necessary to invest? only eth and fiat?

KYC is not something that investors like to see but I think something like that would be necessary to legalize tokens.

that's the issue I really hate. crypto was supposed to be a getaway from government control and regulation.

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

hardcapped project will bring more earnings of course due to created hype and investors confidence. Building example is very good. 10 years of making or a year. but dont forget cost reductions even in a hardcapped project. devs shouldnt waste a dime.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: wissy on October 02, 2018, 03:48:08 AM

Quote from: Token Williams on October 01, 2018, 06:40:36 PM

Quote from: batako on October 01, 2018, 10:57:48 AM

Quote from: Token Williams on October 01, 2018, 10:30:51 AM

Quote from: Makkara on October 01, 2018, 07:41:23 AM

How much was raised so far? Just trying to understand what kind of response is getting at this point

Looks like 2.4+ million

Yes, as we can see on the main site, they are already raised $2.4millions+. The hard cap will be $30m and the main sale is still alive now. Btw, the softcap is at $2m which is already gainned!

I always think the margin between soft and hard cap is so wide.

True, the difference is usually very significant, but it's logical if you think of it. Soft cap and hard cap are extremes, minimum and maximum, so it makes sense that the difference between them is large.

Yes, soft cap means the money they can barely run the project and hard cap is the fastest and best way to run it.

You can build a building in a year or in 10 years, it is all about the budget you have.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: Token Williams on October 01, 2018, 06:40:36 PM

Quote from: batako on October 01, 2018, 10:57:48 AM

Quote from: Token Williams on October 01, 2018, 10:30:51 AM

Quote from: Makkara on October 01, 2018, 07:41:23 AM

How much was raised so far? Just trying to understand what kind of response is getting at this point

Looks like 2.4+ million

Yes, as we can see on the main site, they are already raised $2.4millions+. The hard cap will be $30m and the main sale is still alive now. Btw, the softcap is at $2m which is already gainned!

I always think the margin between soft and hard cap is so wide.

True, the difference is usually very significant, but it's logical if you think of it. Soft cap and hard cap are extremes, minimum and maximum, so it makes sense that the difference between them is large.

pynetx

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 262

Quote from: zgrdyg on October 01, 2018, 11:43:36 PM

Quote from: LastHiT on October 01, 2018, 06:26:57 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

In my opinion even %10 decrease in costs can have a huge positive impact for companies. with %30 decrease you can change the industry.

You are right. For businesses having huge daily transactions even 1% would make a difference.

nobytes

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 101

Quote from: levyashin on October 02, 2018, 12:21:01 AM

Quote from: zgrdyg on October 01, 2018, 11:43:36 PM

Quote from: LastHiT on October 01, 2018, 06:26:57 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

In my opinion even %10 decrease in costs can have a huge positive impact for companies. with %30 decrease you can change the industry.

In every kind of business, you need less expenditure for a bigger profit. Even for %1 everyone would choose laneaxis.

To be fair there are lot's of reasons people are choosing their services, price is just one of them. Then comes the questions like does the price cut from the quality. In this case the platform is the reason for the price cut.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: zgrdyg on October 01, 2018, 11:43:36 PM

Quote from: LastHiT on October 01, 2018, 06:26:57 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

In my opinion even %10 decrease in costs can have a huge positive impact for companies. with %30 decrease you can change the industry.

In every kind of business, you need less expenditure for a bigger profit. Even for %1 everyone would choose laneaxis.

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

Quote from: LastHiT on October 01, 2018, 06:26:57 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

In my opinion even %10 decrease in costs can have a huge positive impact for companies. with %30 decrease you can change the industry.

Token Williams

newbie

Activity: 310

Merit: 0

Quote from: batako on October 01, 2018, 10:57:48 AM

Quote from: Token Williams on October 01, 2018, 10:30:51 AM

Quote from: Makkara on October 01, 2018, 07:41:23 AM

How much was raised so far? Just trying to understand what kind of response is getting at this point

Looks like 2.4+ million

Yes, as we can see on the main site, they are already raised $2.4millions+. The hard cap will be $30m and the main sale is still alive now. Btw, the softcap is at $2m which is already gainned!

I always think the margin between soft and hard cap is so wide.

LastHiT

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: rjp55 on October 01, 2018, 03:18:30 PM

their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total

That is really very appealing having to save that big amount on every consumer goods will surely have a positive impact to the company and to the end users as well.

Topic: [ANN][ICO] LANEAXIS (U.S Patented): Blockchain Solution For Transportaion - page 58. (Read 115090 times)