Topic: ♦♦♦♦♦♦[ANN]♦♦MTR♦♦MasterTraderCoin♦♦10.4m♦♦TOSHIDESK LLC♦♦ETNA Partnership♦♦♦♦♦♦ - page 143. (Read 229808 times)
February 24, 2015, 03:05:06 PM
Great start thanks!
February 24, 2015, 02:44:40 PM
February 24, 2015, 02:32:56 PM
FYI: c-cex said they will be taking a look at MTR...
looking
February 24, 2015, 02:28:18 PM
FYI: c-cex said they will be taking a look at MTR...
February 24, 2015, 02:22:04 PM
I think people are going to wait until the last possible moment and transfer BTC big time to phase 2, in the hope that the BTC pool is not that big and that they get ICO @ under mining cost. It would be interesting to see how big the transfer at the end that ICO will be and if it will be over subscribed at more than mining unit cost. It might just turn out to be a very fascinating race to watch.
February 24, 2015, 02:16:54 PM
Is there already claim ico in phase I?
The 1st phase is closed and coins have not been distributed.
February 24, 2015, 02:01:23 PM
Is there already claim ico in phase I?
February 24, 2015, 01:44:53 PM
Got 7 coins so far, i could call this a fair launch from the heavy rental miners, it feels like the good old days of mining solo with gpus.
BIG UP TO MTR!
BIG UP TO MTR!
That's what I was going for, I wanted everyone to get a fair piece before the heavy hitters came to play.
Thanks for your support!
Be sure to check out the ToshiDesk Landing Page:
www.ToshiDesk.co
and
www.MasterTraderCoin.com
MasterTrader777
This is his answer.
February 24, 2015, 01:34:22 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Is that a pre-requisite to quote someone's post?
of course specially when your giving an answer to a development your not even a part of, your that emotional right now that you want to answer others peoples comments that are clear none supporters, that just hurting your own phase 1 investment. im not even 100% sure you even invested on phase 1 at this point!
Fine, I had my rant. Lets play along and see where it goes and wait for the dev to make an announcement.
February 24, 2015, 01:31:40 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Am I wrong if I ask?
Very funny to see people who commented for assessing a person from when he posts, funny...
See, there I am not quoting posts from anyone, I just want an explanation of dev, because I am interested in this coin, that's all.
interested, lmao dude look at your posting history.
edit: i wouldn't be surprise if this is you jc12345
Thank you for reading my postings
Did you read from the beginning, all?
It would be very honored if you do it all
Sorry, I am not going to respond to you again, there is no point
February 24, 2015, 01:19:48 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Am I wrong if I ask?
Very funny to see people who commented for assessing a person from when he posts, funny...
See, there I am not quoting posts from anyone, I just want an explanation of dev, because I am interested in this coin, that's all.
interested, lmao dude look at your posting history.
edit: i wouldn't be surprise if this is you jc12345
February 24, 2015, 01:18:07 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Am I wrong if I ask?
Very funny to see people who commented for assessing a person from when he posts, funny...
See, there I am not quoting posts from anyone, I just want an explanation of dev, because I am interested in this coin, that's all.
February 24, 2015, 01:12:46 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Is that a pre-requisite to quote someone's post?
of course specially when your giving an answer to a development your not even a part of, your that emotional right now that you want to answer others peoples comments that are clear none supporters, that just hurting your own phase 1 investment. im not even 100% sure you even invested on phase 1 at this point!
February 24, 2015, 01:07:26 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
Is that a pre-requisite to quote someone's post? and yes I am emotional because the dev seemed to be a fresh breeze. Also I hate ninja moves.
February 24, 2015, 01:05:04 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.
February 24, 2015, 01:02:36 PM
I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...
Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.
So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.
Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.
Ive been in shitter situations for sure.
Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.
So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.
Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.
Ive been in shitter situations for sure.
Maybe it is not the end of the world and everything will work out. Even if phase 1 make 10 BTC each, it is still a matter of principle. It seems that we are still a long way from operating ethical in crypto. O well.
Completely understand everyone's position here, at the current moment i couldn't be any happier with a x10 growth on my phase 1 investment, if we get to the bottom line is we invested to make money and b/c we like the idea the dev put together.
Yes, every phase 1 investor will be very happy with the profit, it is just how the profit is obtained that is a problem. It is possible to make a lot of money in life by lying and/or cheating but that does not make it right.
Im sure the dev would make a statement about it, what i see is you getting really emotional on your possible thoughts, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10568042
wait in till the dev makes their statement and take it from there.
February 24, 2015, 01:00:25 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.
February 24, 2015, 12:58:07 PM
I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...
Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.
So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.
Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.
Ive been in shitter situations for sure.
Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.
So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.
Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.
Ive been in shitter situations for sure.
Maybe it is not the end of the world and everything will work out. Even if phase 1 make 10 BTC each, it is still a matter of principle. It seems that we are still a long way from operating ethical in crypto and until people start operating with principles crypto will remain a **** hole where everyone is out for his own profit and it doesn't matter how the profit is obtained. O well.
I see your point and agree. Lets see what the dev has to say. Things can def be worse, but is still a little concerning.
February 24, 2015, 12:52:54 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
I think an explanation would go to MTR supporters not the random forum, like how phase 1 investors got a very nice details email of their investment.
February 24, 2015, 12:47:09 PM
Really want to hear an explanation of this situation
Jump to: