Author

Topic: [ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 177. (Read 347332 times)

full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100

Until we get our second stratum server up

Sooner the better.  Not much good working out new and wonderful ways to maximize profit if we can't mine... Seriously, move it up the priority list.
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Looks like we're mooooooooooving right along
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 683
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Welp, at least my cards are getting a breather  Grin

Get some backup pools enabled, don't let those cards stop digging!!

I really should. 
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 683
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
Damn stratum server Sad sorry about the outage will be up in a few.

Until we get our second stratum server up make sure you guys set failovers just in case the cows go poop.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Welp, at least my cards are getting a breather  Grin

Get some backup pools enabled, don't let those cards stop digging!!
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Welp, at least my cards are getting a breather  Grin
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Another nice feature would be an alert on the website when the stratum server is down.  That way we know if it's a server issue or possible connectivity issue.

Although, the 0 Pool Hashrates are a dead giveaway.... Wink
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Someone trip over the power cord of the server?  Wink
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
Guys, when you get a chance, have a look at rounds 1188 and 1189.  At the start of round 1188 which went for 15 minutes, according to coinchoose MEC was the 2nd most profitable coin behind FTC, with ANC 3rd and its difficulty dropping fast.  We mined MEC for 15 minutes and didn't change to ANC until it hit a rock bottom difficulty of 1.  

Despite that round 1189 was twice as profitable as round 1188 even though it only went for 10 minutes.  The reason it only went 10 minutes is that every man and his dog jumped on it at the same time!! We should have jumped on ANC at least 5 minutes before we did and we would have cleaned up!

Please adjust the algorithms so that when ANC gets to say a difficulty of around 5, we jump on it.  
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 683
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
Another idea: on the coin balances tab, how about a check box for "Automatically cash out daily BTC earnings"

You could just set a threshold of 0.001 on your BTC settings Smiley


My apologies if I am asking a question that has already been answered - I couldn't find an answer by skimming through the pages of posts, though:

Is there any withdrawal transaction fee, like many pools do?  (e.g. a 0.01 BTC withdrawal fee for withdrawals under 0.05 BTC)

Thanks!

Just a 0.0001 TX fee. Smiley
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Another idea: on the coin balances tab, how about a check box for "Automatically cash out daily BTC earnings"

You could just set a threshold of 0.001 on your BTC settings Smiley


My apologies if I am asking a question that has already been answered - I couldn't find an answer by skimming through the pages of posts, though:

Is there any withdrawal transaction fee, like many pools do?  (e.g. a 0.01 BTC withdrawal fee for withdrawals under 0.05 BTC)

Thanks!
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Holy 30% reject rate batman. FRK 'n thing...
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I get that you're up to 340+Mh/s and that is really impressive for a new pool. I guess my point is that if everyone is also experiencing getwork failures, that could be a reason for lower profits. I mean, to me, if I have a latency issue to your server, I would have a higher amount of stale shares & rejects because I can't get and submit work fast enough. But if I'm straight up getting getwork failures, that seems to me that the server is too slow to process getwork requests. But if no one else is seeing a high amount of GF, then it should be lower on your priority.


I'd be surprised to hear wide-spread getwork failures were a problem.  The server is more than capable of a lot more than 350Mh.   Have you been seeing this for an extended period, or just recently?  Its possible that its related to the diff changes we introduced the other day, in which case I'll need to take a  closer look.    I haven't heard of other complaints since the change though. 
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100

Regarding and NA server, it is absolutely on our list, but I feel there are a few short term adjustments we can implement that will (hopefully) be to the benefit of everyone mining, before we get to implementing a second server.  its not written in stone of course, perhaps it gets bumped up the list as we go along.  We are working hard to improve the experience across the board, and always open to feedback/suggestions.


I get that you're up to 340+Mh/s and that is really impressive for a new pool. I guess my point is that if everyone is also experiencing getwork failures, that could be a reason for lower profits. I mean, to me, if I have a latency issue to your server, I would have a higher amount of stale shares & rejects because I can't get and submit work fast enough. But if I'm straight up getting getwork failures, that seems to me that the server is too slow to process getwork requests. But if no one else is seeing a high amount of GF, then it should be lower on your priority.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Hmmm. Est. Daily BTC Earnings seem quite a bit down versus the last few days, at least for me.

Haven't dug into it too much since earlier today, but I notice a bunch of prices down on some of our frequent coins, and some slightly higher than usual backed up orders as a result.  Not sure how much we'll recover in the next 1.5hrs.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Hmmm. Est. Daily BTC Earnings seem quite a bit down versus the last few days, at least for me.
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
I've enabled this for a bit. Feel free to ping away if still interested.  fwiw I seem to average ~100-115ms from Ontario. 
Thank you

--- stratum01.hashco.ws ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 160.270/165.877/178.090/4.027 ms

Not too bad from California.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Did you try hitting the website (hashco.ws, different ip), or actually mine?  Ping being dropped isn't an indication of a problem.  
I was trying to ping stratum01.hashco.ws to see how bad the latency is to see whether it is worth giving it a try.  France can either be bad or terrible from here and ping is a very valuable tool for measuring latency and loss.

Fair enough, far cry from the site being down or broken Smiley

I've enabled this for a bit. Feel free to ping away if still interested.  fwiw I seem to average ~100-115ms from Ontario.

Happy mining.
Jump to: