simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever
What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it.
You're comparing apples and oranges. Bitcoin was the first. It didn't have any competition, it didn't need to be promoted. It was the new shit. SpectreCoin is a privacy coin in a sea of privacy coins.
What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very
unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down.
As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is.
The quality of a privacy coin doesn't matter if nobody is willing to use it.
The short or long term makes no difference. If people see this as a long-term coin, great, but remember, if this is used as an excuse for not promoting the coin, not attempting to move it more by getting it on better exchanges, and crawling development, then people will get bored of holding it.
There will be other privacy coins which will have better tech, will be better promoted, people will jump ship and we will end up with a dead coin.
