Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine - page 130. (Read 578501 times)
August 06, 2014, 11:27:45 AM
Can i to mine XCN with GPUs ? and how if can ?
August 06, 2014, 11:11:19 AM
Well, since the GPU arrived, here's a CPU freebie. :-)
NOTE - this code is only safe on 64 bit systems with 64 bit GMP. The real way to do it is to grab the #defines from jh00's xptminer and re-use:
Gets rid of all of that time wasted in mpz_export, as I alluded to earlier...
NOTE - this code is only safe on 64 bit systems with 64 bit GMP. The real way to do it is to grab the #defines from jh00's xptminer and re-use:
Code:
#if defined _WIN64 || __x86_64__
uint32_t d;
for(d = 0; d< bns[0]->_mp_size; d++) { /* Thanks, jh00 - xptMiner to the rescue */
*(uint64_t*)(bdata+d*8) = bns[0]->_mp_d[d];
}
#else
mpz_export((void *)bdata, NULL, -1, 1, 0, 0, bns[0]);
#endif
Gets rid of all of that time wasted in mpz_export, as I alluded to earlier...
Win64 GMP uses 32bit legs because sizeof(long) == 4 on win64. Doh, MS.
That's what led to the launch bug in a way.
August 06, 2014, 10:40:33 AM
i wonder if i can get coins, i really like this coin even i am a newbie.
Feel free to mine them. All you need is a CPU/GPU
http://xcn.1gh.com/
August 06, 2014, 10:35:35 AM
August 06, 2014, 10:35:05 AM
how about the coin new features?
August 06, 2014, 10:25:09 AM
cubydu are you serious? You mispelled XCN a couple times.
August 05, 2014, 07:30:09 PM
A half decent GPU miner has been created:
https://github.com/MiniblockchainProject/CudaMiner
There are several things to keep in mind 1) it is designed to work with 700 series nVidia cards but should work on 400 series cards if you change the make file 2) for now you will have to compile the GPU miner yourself for various reasons, we will try to post pre-compiled binaries when they become available.
See github project page for more information about usage and compiling.
https://github.com/MiniblockchainProject/CudaMiner
There are several things to keep in mind 1) it is designed to work with 700 series nVidia cards but should work on 400 series cards if you change the make file 2) for now you will have to compile the GPU miner yourself for various reasons, we will try to post pre-compiled binaries when they become available.
See github project page for more information about usage and compiling.
Cool. However, doesn't seem to work on EC2 GPU instance (GRID K520). minerd gives error:
Code:
GPUassert: invalid device ordinal trashminer.cu 370
I guess it should be expected since it is supposed to work with 700 series of cards.
It'll work on AWS; you just need to play with it a little.
August 06, 2014, 10:22:21 AM
Free $XCN for twit !!!!!!!!!
The next 30 people can get 75 xnc for positive twit about #XCN.
Twit link to private pls
* Fine Print: You must follow both of the terms above. I have the right to deny anyone the prize for any reason, including "I just don't like you". The most quality answer(s) may receive a bonus Grin
The next 30 people can get 75 xnc for positive twit about #XCN.
Twit link to private pls
* Fine Print: You must follow both of the terms above. I have the right to deny anyone the prize for any reason, including "I just don't like you". The most quality answer(s) may receive a bonus Grin
August 06, 2014, 10:10:43 AM
Thanks for playing. I don't see an address in your signature boy.
YOU CAN CHECK AGAIN 
That address isn't a valid address. It's too short or something.
August 06, 2014, 09:47:40 AM
Well, since the GPU arrived, here's a CPU freebie. :-)
NOTE - this code is only safe on 64 bit systems with 64 bit GMP. The real way to do it is to grab the #defines from jh00's xptminer and re-use:
Gets rid of all of that time wasted in mpz_export, as I alluded to earlier...
NOTE - this code is only safe on 64 bit systems with 64 bit GMP. The real way to do it is to grab the #defines from jh00's xptminer and re-use:
Code:
#if defined _WIN64 || __x86_64__
uint32_t d;
for(d = 0; d< bns[0]->_mp_size; d++) { /* Thanks, jh00 - xptMiner to the rescue */
*(uint64_t*)(bdata+d*8) = bns[0]->_mp_d[d];
}
#else
mpz_export((void *)bdata, NULL, -1, 1, 0, 0, bns[0]);
#endif
Gets rid of all of that time wasted in mpz_export, as I alluded to earlier...
August 06, 2014, 09:16:08 AM
Has anyone compiled this on windows yet that can provide the source? I'm still trying to get it to compile, but keep hitting bumps in the road
August 06, 2014, 08:16:36 AM
Whast hashrates are you getting?
GTX 670 - ~2150 Khash
August 06, 2014, 08:13:10 AM
sell me some
August 06, 2014, 07:18:59 AM
What happened?
The price down fast.
The price down fast.
August 06, 2014, 07:15:47 AM
Some test result on Cudaminer
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
Whast hashrates are you getting?
August 06, 2014, 06:41:09 AM
Some test result on Cudaminer
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
Whast hashrates are you getting?
August 06, 2014, 06:39:50 AM
Some test result on Cudaminer
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
The newest version may 100% GPU computing. The old version may <100% GPU computing.
The newest version use <10% CPU, the old version use 100%CPU.
The old version 15% faster than the new version.
So may be the old version combined CPU and GPU, may be better.
August 06, 2014, 06:16:29 AM
why don't reduce the number of coin ?
Doesn't matter where you put the limit as long as it is fixed.
August 06, 2014, 05:57:25 AM
why don't reduce the number of coin ?
August 06, 2014, 05:00:17 AM
why did the bottom fall out on the price???
More supply than demand is always the only objectively correct answer.
But my opinion is that it was grossly overvalued for a coin that was only a few days old with major "growing pains" and I said so a few days ago.
There is also an overhang of one guy with over 500k coins mined from the beginning at very low cost (and whatever other ninja miners we don't know about)
I still think it is somewhat overvalued, but not too bad at this point. I'd be a buyer at 1500 given no further developments.
Do you think it goes back up in the long run, given the high supply?
Sorry to say, the coin is great and all, but i think we will go below 1000 today.
Long term it can be a good investment.
Jump to: