Topic: [ANN][XFC] Finercoin丨X11丨POW+POS丨First Working Anonymous Coin丨Launched June 26 - page 18. (Read 85773 times)
June 29, 2014, 10:37:45 AM
The coin may be next XC
June 29, 2014, 10:21:06 AM
I think the dev is dumping this coin.
Development won't fetch much June 29, 2014, 10:19:31 AM
It´s called FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) for a reason. Fear is always has been used to manipulate people. They play with you insecurity and fear of losing money. If there is no evidence, keep calm and dont get manipulated. Do your own research.
Only 5 mill coins, CoinJoin private functionality.....
Only 5 mill coins, CoinJoin private functionality.....
June 29, 2014, 10:12:57 AM
glad i sold at 9k
June 29, 2014, 10:06:51 AM
I think the dev is dumping this coin.
June 29, 2014, 09:33:46 AM
This coin is worth attention
June 29, 2014, 09:26:23 AM
very cheap 
June 29, 2014, 09:10:06 AM
New technology
June 29, 2014, 08:48:54 AM
Has anonymous，very cheap
June 29, 2014, 08:46:03 AM
how do i get mature coins to start minting or how much coins do you need for it?
pos begins after block 10001 June 29, 2014, 08:24:03 AM
how do i get mature coins to start minting or how much coins do you need for it?
June 29, 2014, 03:58:19 AM
Coinminers NOMP Pool Hosted in US
Finercoin NOMP Pool
No registration needed
http://coin-miners.info:8080/getting_started
URL (difficulty Vardiff): stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990
Username: your Finercoin wallet address
Password: anything
./sgminer --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990 -u your Finercoin wallet address -p anything
You can check the total blocks found at http://coin-miners.info:8080/tbs under the Finercoin Total Blocks column and the block confirmed under the Finercoin Confirmed column
Payments:
1% fee.
Note: Payments every 60 sec after the coins get confirmed.Minimum payment 0.01 XFC
Rent some x11 hash power at
http://www.miningrigrentals.com/
No registration needed
Support at #COINMINERS freenode channel : https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#COINMINERS
http://coin-miners.info:8080/getting_started
URL (difficulty Vardiff): stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990
Username: your Finercoin wallet address
Password: anything
./sgminer --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990 -u your Finercoin wallet address -p anything
You can check the total blocks found at http://coin-miners.info:8080/tbs under the Finercoin Total Blocks column and the block confirmed under the Finercoin Confirmed column
Payments:
1% fee.
Note: Payments every 60 sec after the coins get confirmed.Minimum payment 0.01 XFC
Rent some x11 hash power at
http://www.miningrigrentals.com/
June 29, 2014, 03:25:27 AM
CoinJoin is a ready to implement system which loljosh can implement into any of the coins you pay him for.
And you are masturbating here that this coin has a finished "anon" by start. Really.
And you are masturbating here that this coin has a finished "anon" by start. Really.
June 29, 2014, 03:23:51 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.
Also this is still not ANON.
It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?
What do you call an ANON?
All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.
This is by far the weakest way to do anone and everyone can implement CoinJoin.
You are being terribly stupid.
those who name others stupid, he is more stupid than others
You are literally arguing about anon with someone who is checking on anon coins and their implementations on a daily basis because I am terribly interested in them.
You are a fresh account which invested in a coin you are defending. You couldn't defend yourself vs any of the claims I made because I am not trolling.
Please open your eyes.
June 29, 2014, 03:18:58 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.
Also this is still not ANON.
It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?
What do you call an ANON?
All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.
This is by far the weakest way to do anone and everyone can implement CoinJoin.
You are being terribly stupid.
those who name others stupid, he is more stupid than others
June 29, 2014, 03:16:17 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.
Also this is still not ANON.
It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?
What do you call an ANON?
All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.
This is by far the weakest way to do anon and everyone can implement CoinJoin.
You are being terribly stupid.
June 29, 2014, 03:13:31 AM
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
You are being trolled.
what he said doesn't make sense, that is why i want to correct him.
June 29, 2014, 03:12:26 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.
Also this is still not ANON.
It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?
What do you call an ANON?
All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.
June 29, 2014, 03:09:52 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.
Also this is still not ANON.
It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?
What do you call an ANON?
Edit: First time really? Anyone can just fetch the code of a finished CoinJoin and put it into a wallet. It's a finished code for a centralised mixer. I am not here to troll, you are obviously new here and straight out avoid my questions.
June 29, 2014, 03:07:16 AM
Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.
where do you get the so called thousands of hours?If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.
But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.
This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?
As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.
What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.
Jump to: