What do you make out of this buy wall?
Lets see what happens to this wall when price will be closer...
Topic: [ANN][XST] Stealth-Coin.com | Tor | StealthText, World's first anonymous SMS Tx! - page 188. (Read 748616 times)
September 21, 2014, 05:23:30 AM
Lets see what happens to this wall when price will be closer...
September 21, 2014, 04:58:10 AM
Does anybody trade Stealth on Cryptsy?
September 21, 2014, 04:35:10 AM
both stealth and librex are owned by a P&D group....roughly 40% on both coins...there goal was to pump both to 15k before exiting. Don't believe me?? I don't care as time will tell. Why are both coins being pumped simultaneously??? Is this just coincidence?
There's been more than one P&D group playing with these two coins.
Well either way...One of the groups plan has been 15k exit
I'm also with a group, the Stealthcoin Group. The group say...
LOL, jealous much?
September 21, 2014, 04:27:59 AM
What do you make out of this buy wall?
September 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Stealthcoin is without a doubt the most exciting coin in the market right now. I believe that it has the potential to absorb all other cryptonote alt currencies on the market, great time to buy more.
Just wanna remind everyone that XST is without a doubt the best bet right now in the crypto market.
September 21, 2014, 04:05:46 AM
I just woke up to stabile 13k, thats crazy.
20k when we hit mintpal ?
20k when we hit mintpal ?
What was it at when you went to sleep?
September 21, 2014, 04:03:07 AM
I just woke up to stabile 13k, thats crazy.
20k when we hit mintpal ?
20k when we hit mintpal ?
What was it at when you went to sleep?
September 21, 2014, 04:00:27 AM
I just woke up to stabile 13k, thats crazy.
20k when we hit mintpal ?
20k when we hit mintpal ?
September 21, 2014, 02:44:59 AM
Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.
A dev (I think he's a Monero guy) said that Chandran Signatures are actually larger and slower. So I asked him about it given the StealthSend white paper says they're smaller and gave examples of how they would be smaller. He explained that yes, with the examples given in the white paper, they would be smaller than CN, but when you have a lot less sigs in the mix, it would actually end up being larger than the CN sigs. He also showed me a Monero transaction that was very small, < 1k in size.
He also said that Chandran Signatures have the same issue as the CN ones that were outlined in a whitepaper about flaws in Monero.
this guy who you spoke didn't know what is chandran signatures until a few days ago.
monero is a copy&paste of bytecoin
At least the discussion is becoming more elevated. Which I find more interesting.
September 21, 2014, 01:58:51 AM
Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.
A dev (I think he's a Monero guy) said that Chandran Signatures are actually larger and slower. So I asked him about it given the StealthSend white paper says they're smaller and gave examples of how they would be smaller. He explained that yes, with the examples given in the white paper, they would be smaller than CN, but when you have a lot less sigs in the mix, it would actually end up being larger than the CN sigs. He also showed me a Monero transaction that was very small, < 1k in size.
He also said that Chandran Signatures have the same issue as the CN ones that were outlined in a whitepaper about flaws in Monero.
this guy who you spoke didn't know what is chandran signatures until a few days ago.
monero is a copy&paste of bytecoin
September 21, 2014, 01:48:04 AM
Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.
A dev (I think he's a Monero guy) said that Chandran Signatures are actually larger and slower. So I asked him about it given the StealthSend white paper says they're smaller and gave examples of how they would be smaller. He explained that yes, with the examples given in the white paper, they would be smaller than CN, but when you have a lot less sigs in the mix, it would actually end up being larger than the CN sigs. He also showed me a Monero transaction that was very small, < 1k in size.
He also said that Chandran Signatures have the same issue as the CN ones that were outlined in a whitepaper about flaws in Monero.
September 21, 2014, 01:41:23 AM
Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900 
Whales eating dumb money
Whales eating dumb money Really, please have at it!
September 21, 2014, 01:33:49 AM
Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900 Whales eating dumb money
Whales eating dumb money test it
September 21, 2014, 01:31:45 AM
Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900 Whales eating dumb money
Whales eating dumb money September 21, 2014, 01:25:50 AM
Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
Quote
A new arrival in the arena of anonymous crypto-currences, StealthCoin (XST), promises to add ring signatures to the Bitcoin codebase with StealthSend, which is still in development. According to the StealthSend whitepaper (https://www.dropbox.com/s/do4urdefwoungjz/Stealthsend-Whitepaper-Brief-201409.pdf?dl=0), StealthSend transactions using ring signatures of 100 keys will only require about one third the space of similar CryptoNote transactions, but give the same level of privacy protection. This savings is achieved through the use of the use of so-called “Chandran Signatures”, and innovations related to the selection of the keys used for the ring signatures. In StealthSend, key selection is based on four numbers: two random numbers (called “nonces”), one number that reduces the difficulty of selecting the keys by specifying a subset of all possible keys, and one number to specify the size of the ring. Thus, the nonce key selection specifies any set of randomly selected keys using only 32 bytes of storage.Applied to CryptoNotes, the nonce key selection proposed for StealthSend would lead to a space savings of about 30% for future transactions.
http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/18/can-anoncoin-be-the-currency-of-the-deep-web/Or for more technical
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nHiNfcgAAAAJ
Alright so the name "Chandran Signatures" is from the person who proposed it; Nishanth Chandran?
And really it is actually Sublinear Signatures that are being proposed to be added which seems to be a variation of the ring-signatures used by cryptonote currencies. (Hypothesizing here, correct me if I'm wrong)
Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.
If I'm correct with the above, I would assume that this implementation of ring signatures would still be vulnerable to the same exploit used in regular cryptonote currencies. (if BCX has actually found an exploit)
Anyway, interesting stuff. Thanks for the links. I'll keep an eye on this.
Hondo seems to be creating something new, don't just implementing chandran signatures in source code of the regular cryptonotes
September 21, 2014, 01:17:37 AM
1. EmilioMann - Bobsurplus is still way into this coin, unlike what your post earlier said.
2. BTCwriter - Quit the whole posting in BTCD and SuperNET thread telling them that they are spamming this thread. Unless you have facts you are not helping the situation.
I hold this coin and will continue to do so but at the same time both of you make me cringe with your constant cheerleading, circle jerking, reposting, and more.
To sum it up EmilioMann and BTCwriter are the two girls and this thread is becoming their cup.
2. BTCwriter - Quit the whole posting in BTCD and SuperNET thread telling them that they are spamming this thread. Unless you have facts you are not helping the situation.
I hold this coin and will continue to do so but at the same time both of you make me cringe with your constant cheerleading, circle jerking, reposting, and more.
To sum it up EmilioMann and BTCwriter are the two girls and this thread is becoming their cup.
fuck you mother fucker.
I never spoke to you and also not given you confidence to speak that way to me.
From this moment you will be ignored otário filho duma puta
Back to your scam seu viado zéruela trouxa
YAWN
Something something about confidence to speak that way to you, yes, you sound like a retard and I am tired of your shit.
Please ignore me and continue on speaking in a language other than English, because you fucking suck at it.
Back to my scam? So you basically called Stealthcoin a scam?
September 21, 2014, 01:16:05 AM
Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
Quote
A new arrival in the arena of anonymous crypto-currences, StealthCoin (XST), promises to add ring signatures to the Bitcoin codebase with StealthSend, which is still in development. According to the StealthSend whitepaper (https://www.dropbox.com/s/do4urdefwoungjz/Stealthsend-Whitepaper-Brief-201409.pdf?dl=0), StealthSend transactions using ring signatures of 100 keys will only require about one third the space of similar CryptoNote transactions, but give the same level of privacy protection. This savings is achieved through the use of the use of so-called “Chandran Signatures”, and innovations related to the selection of the keys used for the ring signatures. In StealthSend, key selection is based on four numbers: two random numbers (called “nonces”), one number that reduces the difficulty of selecting the keys by specifying a subset of all possible keys, and one number to specify the size of the ring. Thus, the nonce key selection specifies any set of randomly selected keys using only 32 bytes of storage.Applied to CryptoNotes, the nonce key selection proposed for StealthSend would lead to a space savings of about 30% for future transactions.
http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/18/can-anoncoin-be-the-currency-of-the-deep-web/Or for more technical
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nHiNfcgAAAAJ
Alright so the name "Chandran Signatures" is from the person who proposed it; Nishanth Chandran?
And really it is actually Sublinear Signatures that are being proposed to be added which seems to be a variation of the ring-signatures used by cryptonote currencies. (Hypothesizing here, correct me if I'm wrong)
Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.
If I'm correct with the above, I would assume that this implementation of ring signatures would still be vulnerable to the same exploit used in regular cryptonote currencies. (if BCX has actually found an exploit)
Anyway, interesting stuff. Thanks for the links. I'll keep an eye on this.
September 21, 2014, 01:13:37 AM
September 21, 2014, 01:12:22 AM
September 21, 2014, 01:08:15 AM
Get ready for 20k soon!
Jump to: