Topic: [ANN][XST] Stealth-Coin.com | Tor | StealthText, World's first anonymous SMS Tx! - page 340. (Read 748616 times)

More than a 4.5 BTC buy at bittrex in an instance...someone knows something big is going to happen pretty soon!!!

More than a 4.5 BTC buy at bittrex in an instance...someone knows something big is going to happen pretty soon!!!

+1

Attn: CoinStarX & FurianSun

One look through your posts and it is blatantly obvious you both are librexcoin fanboys trying to stir shit up.  Here are some funny things about your coin, one it was created after XST.
Two, once Stealthsend was announced and given a timeframe of late September, all the sudden there is a "Librexsend" being developed for release also in late September.

You can run around all the alt coin threads you wish and spew your bullshit without facts, people will see soon enough that you guys do not know shit.

Troll on, youngins, hope you get some XST while you can.

This for starters. Claims that it had it before shadow coin even existed and that all others copy Stealthcoin. VeriSMS and VeriSend? Seriously?

This for starters. Claims that it had it before shadow coin even existed and that all others copy Stealthcoin. VeriSMS and VeriSend? Seriously?

What does this mean for Shadowcoin? "all others only copy&paste stealth sourcecode"  Well shame on Shadowcoin you bunch of scammers.

Really so how did all these other coins copy this shit from Stealthcoin?

StealthSend is still on target to be released at the end of September. To protect our IP, we are pushing back the whitepaper to about 5 days before that time.

Wait, so vericoin copied something that was never released? How does that work?

I guess this answers to veri trolls that it is not he same SHIT bro!!!

That is a much better name, I'm in the SDC community and i wish you guys luck.

FYI, be on the lookout for VRC trolls as they will prolly claim a rip off of their SMS based VERISend.

The versms transactions are in the clear. They are not encrypted. If a user wants the world to see what he is sending and have a transaction that is vulnerable to manipulation, he should use verisms. If he wants it to be private, secure, and tamper-proof, he should use StealthText.

Please take a look at the title of this thread and everyone stop using steathtext or stealthchat. Obviously Hondo was trying to get the point across to everyone exactly what the Android app will do. Anon(stealth) sending of the coins in your wallet at home from your phone using sms to make the transaction(tx) happen. At least that is how I understand it.
   
Re: [ANN][XST] Stealth-Coin.com | Tor | StealthSend, World's first anonymous SMS Tx!

Looks funy noobs will belive but smart people after part eg.

"stealthcoin is the first tor + pos coin" - will see total BS of their dev...

rat4 from blackcoin even was not trying claim TOR as BC feature because all QT clients can be run on tor...
at end posted link https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Tor but tor was development by bitcoin-qt devs
normal developers won't write that their coin is "1st tor + POS"

So same SDC can be used on TOR too without problems on day 0 same like BTC,PPC,BC..

In general when bitcoin-qt get update SDC dev can apply any security update...
Difference is that some devs don't claim features that don't belongs to them.
Some people just want to pump their coin bag but this is pathetic...

I just got the message processor complete and we have had our first fully automated StealthText transaction, which is a big step.

1c6f16b92097d3beb4a5b64ff14eb83470f69367e95808952bf280599a5e55ac

Now that I have that done, I'm going to work on instructions and simplifying the process, and I'll also work on finishing the whitepaper, which is still in "rough draft" form.

A number of people have been curious about why StealthText uses email to transmit the encrypted transaction to the wallet. This necessity boils down to the fact that two fundamentally different communication protocols are involved.

On one end (the phone), you have SMS, and on the other end (the wallet) you have TCP/IP. Somehow you need a service that intercepts the SMS and turns it into TCP/IP. One such service (of many) is google voice. If you have a google voice account, your SMS messages can be turned into TCP/IP messages, which take the form of email. I boldface and underline "One" because there are plenty of other ways to skin this particular cat. I chose google voice and email because it is free and convenient. In other words, email is chosen for its convenience and not out of necessity.

However, email is an excellent way to encapsulate information. It is a perfect metaphor for regular mail. In regular mail, you have a message on a piece of paper. You put the message in an envelope and put it in a mail box to be carried away by the postman. The nature of the message (and even the medium on which the message is printed) does not change in this process.

The same is true for email. The encrypted transaction gets packaged into a message with To: and From: headers and other information. However, the encrypted transaction does not change during this process. The email is then sent through TCP/IP, where it is routed to its recipient.

This email message, with the unchanged encrypted transaction, comes over a protocol called IMAP. IMAP is not understood by the wallet (it's a protocol for mail not cryptocurrencies!), so the transaction (unchanged) needs to be unpackaged from it's email envelop and repackaged into RPC (remote procedure call), which is understood by the wallet. And, just like when you unpackage and repackage physical objects, they don't change during the process. They are simply moved from one package to another.

That's the function of the simple message processor I wrote over the last couple of nights. As you can imagine, this conversion from mail format to wallet format is not common, so I had to write the message processor specifically for this task.

-- Hondo