ICO has long ceased to attract a large audience. And I think that project developers have realized that the cost of creating an imaginary project is large and can not be compared with income.
Actually not all ICOs, there are still many out there ICO that attract investors' attention. Moreover, the project is really good. For ICO scams, of course many people have avoided it. So, until now, I haven't seen anyone say that ICO was completely deleted or died. 
Topic: Are ICOs gonna phase out very soon? - page 10. (Read 5375 times)
ICO has long ceased to attract a large audience. And I think that project developers have realized that the cost of creating an imaginary project is large and can not be compared with income.
The crypto market is still evolving and in its dynamic state there is a season for everything and each particular one has its peak, ICO's had its peak in the late 2017 to early 2018 before the bear market, another of such season may occur and it would be after the recent experience of huge failures of a lot of them by investors have died down. Right now is the period of IEO's and I think it is a better way of launching any new project than ICO's
ICOs won't fade away but there will be some changes. First investors have seen how most ICOs turned out, their investments won't be pumped into ICOs any longer thereby making projects holding ICO exercise not to raise enough funds for their startups.
The aggregate ICOs brought up in the second quarter of 2018 is: $8.4 billion dollars. That doesn't sound like a dead market to me. The facts confirm that a large portion of the new ICOs in the second quarter were unfit to bring more than $100K up in financing.
In any case, this proposes a downsize in the quality of its project listing. That is nothing unexpected to any individual who has watched this division more than quite a long while. A market with for all intents and purposes no hindrances to section for upstarts is going to attract...well, pretty much anybody.
In any case, this proposes a downsize in the quality of its project listing. That is nothing unexpected to any individual who has watched this division more than quite a long while. A market with for all intents and purposes no hindrances to section for upstarts is going to attract...well, pretty much anybody.
A new tool for popularization - IEO has become very popular among all cryptocurrency exchanges and the entire community. He was able to protect investors and project developers from mutual deception.
still be careful with the IEO. we can see an exchange of bittrex has also failed to do an IEO project. especially with not so large exchanges, it is still very risky with manipulation.
IEO and ICO will exist in parallel. Is that forbidden? I see the problem only in the fact that the ICO for several years of existence, indeed, acquired a bad reputation because of the frequent deceptions of investors. But if the ICO will be launched with the participation of an authoritative team and a cool promising project, then why should it not exist? And I know today one such ICO, which has already launched a closed presale.
A new tool for popularization - IEO has become very popular among all cryptocurrency exchanges and the entire community. He was able to protect investors and project developers from mutual deception.
for the end it hasn't happened yet, because some ico will still be there even though the way they are ordered is not in demand, and certainly for sto and ieo it is currently a trend and people are more focused on investing in it but I'm sure ico will really die if ieo and sto projects have been categorized as successful by getting a lot of funds from there.
Make sense, its depends on how investors will continue to support projects to be offered, either ways if there's still people who wanted to invest then
it can continue, else, it will not do anything but to be phase out if no support will take place.
if there is no support then the potential is high they will end up scam without refunding investors who have joined earlier. usually those who join private sales with huge bonuses offered. it can continue, else, it will not do anything but to be phase out if no support will take place.
well, if ICO always has a bad impact, I think it will be closed soon. it's just that, now some ICOs are still quite appropriate. but, we don't know what awaits us in the future. I hope the ICO still exists, or is replaced with the IEO
this is just a marketing method to get project development capital. many ways you can do it I think. and all depend on investor confidence in the assessment of the project. if it is feasible for investment, I don't think they care about the method they use, either ICO or IEO. I think everything will continue.it can continue, else, it will not do anything but to be phase out if no support will take place.
well, if ICO always has a bad impact, I think it will be closed soon. it's just that, now some ICOs are still quite appropriate. but, we don't know what awaits us in the future. I hope the ICO still exists, or is replaced with the IEO
this is just a marketing method to get project development capital. many ways you can do it I think. and all depend on investor confidence in the assessment of the project. if it is feasible for investment, I don't think they care about the method they use, either ICO or IEO. I think everything will continue.
I believe that the ICO will continue to come out, as it also remains a good opportunity to raise funds and promote your project. As for the fraudsters, they were, are and will be - unfortunately, this is not going anywhere. In my opinion, for projects it is best to launch ICO and already further IEO, so they will be able to attract the maximum amount of funds and advertise their project in parallel. Also a big role in the quality of ICO is their number. As we see the ICO market has grown and with it the competition.
well, if ICO always has a bad impact, I think it will be closed soon. it's just that, now some ICOs are still quite appropriate. but, we don't know what awaits us in the future. I hope the ICO still exists, or is replaced with the IEO
ICO slowly replaced by IEO projects now. Investors prefer to investing in IEO than ICO.
This is better because there is bigger scam possibility in ICO, most of them are unverified projects which is different from IEO.
now, if we see so many IEO projects that exist and as an investor, investment planning is now visible. if we see people who are not so interested in ICO anymore because they do not give ROI it is actually a loss. This is better because there is bigger scam possibility in ICO, most of them are unverified projects which is different from IEO.
ICO slowly replaced by IEO projects now. Investors prefer to investing in IEO than ICO.
This is better because there is bigger scam possibility in ICO, most of them are unverified projects which is different from IEO.
This is better because there is bigger scam possibility in ICO, most of them are unverified projects which is different from IEO.
I have been playing into some few ICO projects lately, and the reality is that I lost a lot of money due to the domination of the bear market and uncertainty of the projects going forward.
As the old saying goes, more than 90% of those projects are either scams, failed to reach soft cap, or not getting any traction in the next few months or so.
Maybe it’s because ICOs are not regulated and investors like me holds all of the risks.
Until now, there are still new ICOs emerging. However, there are also new ones such as STOs (security token offerings), IEOs (initial exchange offerings), and so on. It seems that both STOs and IEOs are already being considered the next big thing in raising crypto funds for starters.
With their ongoing emergence, are ICOs gonna be over soon? Are they gonna saturate and may phase out due to projects turning to STOs and IEOs?
I wanna know about your thoughts regarding this one, and I would greatly appreciate it whether if you agree or not with my opinion. Thank you in advance.
As the old saying goes, more than 90% of those projects are either scams, failed to reach soft cap, or not getting any traction in the next few months or so.
Maybe it’s because ICOs are not regulated and investors like me holds all of the risks.
Until now, there are still new ICOs emerging. However, there are also new ones such as STOs (security token offerings), IEOs (initial exchange offerings), and so on. It seems that both STOs and IEOs are already being considered the next big thing in raising crypto funds for starters.
With their ongoing emergence, are ICOs gonna be over soon? Are they gonna saturate and may phase out due to projects turning to STOs and IEOs?
I wanna know about your thoughts regarding this one, and I would greatly appreciate it whether if you agree or not with my opinion. Thank you in advance.
I don't see anything new in the ICO, that will make investors and supporters turn around and support the ICO, the scam continues to haunt investors and bounty hunters, so yes it's only a matter of time before we see the last of these ICO it's not worth investing anymore.
I dont think so,but if there are bounty projects that offers ico then this way of fundraising will not be phase out.Amd now some are saying that the IEo is much better than ICO but it depends on how the project is,even they use ico or ieo if the project is not good investors will nlt go to invest in that project.Like this project the Dencoin tokens that has the power to grow over the dump so let us invest in this project.
Well if you do the comparative analysis, you would see that the prospect of having a good project in IEO is far better than that in ICO and this is the reason why people say that IEO is far better than ICO. I personally think that IEO has an edge over ICO and this is good for crypto startups as well because the more investors participate in IEO, the more funds raised. 
if the STO and IEO provide good opportunities for each project and the ICO investors will certainly be removed, after all, if the STO and IEO methods make investors more interested, who will use the ICO method?
I think the IEO is the latest innovation for investors to make better investments.
That's for certain, IEO help to select project that are legitimate unlike ICO which everyone are priveleged to start even if they are scammers in disguise. IEO could steal the attention of the ICO investors just easy I think the IEO is the latest innovation for investors to make better investments.
simply because, well, who doesn't wants a more secured and legit way of investing than just giving away our money to strangers? I guess the answer for that is obvious.
if the STO and IEO provide good opportunities for each project and the ICO investors will certainly be removed, after all, if the STO and IEO methods make investors more interested, who will use the ICO method?
I think the IEO is the latest innovation for investors to make better investments.
I think the IEO is the latest innovation for investors to make better investments.
Jump to: