I agree to drawingthesun. I'm afraid to use this word, but it's like on eBay.
But this is a point which has to be cleared at the beginning.
Topic: ASICMINER Auction: 50 Block Erupter Blades CHECK OP FOR PAYMENT - page 23. (Read 138636 times)
April 30, 2013, 09:55:05 AM
April 30, 2013, 09:52:44 AM
I meant "binding", sorry for the typo.
I agree. He should get a scammer tag. how many bids did he put in to pollute the string so that real bidders could not follow the frantic pace of bidding and could not tell what the correct lowest price was? I wanted some blades and did not bid high enough, but people that were just "playing" really effed the auction up and since this happened on the forum, I think he should be marked as UNTRUSTWORTHY or SCAMMER. April 30, 2013, 09:51:04 AM
if someone can't pay within 24 hours just have a look who is next beyond the cutoff and sell it them if they are still interested.
"if they are still interested"? WTF?
BIDS ARE BINDING. Or what kind of joke auctions are we having here?
Not if you lost. Once you know your not a winner nothing is binding. You can reuse your funds to do what ever you want. Its up to the auction master to make sure people bidding have the funds and are trustworthy. If a winner fails to pay you can't start forcing losers to pay. The losers have probably moved on.
April 30, 2013, 09:47:58 AM
I meant "binding", sorry for the typo.
April 30, 2013, 09:47:42 AM
if someone can't pay within 24 hours just have a look who is next beyond the cutoff and sell it them if they are still interested.
"if they are still interested"? WTF?
BIDS ARE BINGING. Or what kind of joke auctions are we having here?
April 30, 2013, 09:46:27 AM
if someone can't pay within 24 hours just have a look who is next beyond the cutoff and sell it them if they are still interested.
April 30, 2013, 09:34:45 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
Are you joking? So pay now and don't take silly excuses that makes you look ridiculous.
It is not an excuse, my intention was last to bid, first to pay.
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
If thats what he did, he needs to be scammer tagged immediately.
That's what he did. There's proof on the forum. We need to apply the rules or otherwise auctions will become a joke on these forums. We need the scammer tag for this guy, and for him to be blacklisted to future auctions. He will create another account, but at least is a start to avoid misuse of these subforums.
1PHYa1KDMTu8jfsiTDocBjcnno7GqBSFjC
............
ICTxnrA4JzSdd/VqiN9qQlWbAslyghTvbWii4tVxQqXnKrHe9y63G8ee6WvzSDQsU2SP06RrZcj1rp/2Xe3G3tg=
Anyhow, my intentions were as stated, but time didn't permit.
April 30, 2013, 08:50:19 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
If thats what he did, he needs to be scammer tagged immediately.
That's what he did. There's proof on the forum. We need to apply the rules or otherwise auctions will become a joke on these forums. We need the scammer tag for this guy, and for him to be blacklisted to future auctions. He will create another account, but at least is a start to avoid misuse of these subforums.
He can create another forum account, but WinVery.com as a gambling site would be sunk. Scammer tag.
April 30, 2013, 08:47:05 AM
I agree. If this is tolerated, what's to stop me as a shareholder from intentionally ramping up the bid price to get higher dividends? Then I could just say "oops, my bad - I'm out". I think he should be forced to pay and then he can sell them as he wishes. The winning bid is a contract to pay - anything else is a scam.
April 30, 2013, 08:46:24 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
If thats what he did, he needs to be scammer tagged immediately.
That's what he did. There's proof on the forum. We need to apply the rules or otherwise auctions will become a joke on these forums. We need the scammer tag for this guy, and for him to be blacklisted to future auctions. He will create another account, but at least is a start to avoid misuse of these subforums.
April 30, 2013, 08:41:29 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
If thats what he did, he needs to be scammer tagged immediately.
April 30, 2013, 08:38:12 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
I'll bite. Signed wallet address showing an amount of 105BTC or greater please.
Here's what happened - you placed a bid with the only way you could pay is if someone bought immediately from you. When that fell through, you backed out. I would hope anyone reading this would think twice about going to your gambling site. I'm sure that's legit too.
April 30, 2013, 08:32:30 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
Are you joking? So pay now and don't take silly excuses that makes you look ridiculous.
April 30, 2013, 08:29:50 AM
He should be blacklisted as a hardware day trader, he had NO intention of completing and was looking for another buyer to pawn them off immediately afterwards. I don't believe he had any funds, or access to funds to complete without an immediate sale and I was forced to cock block to prevent this atrocious behaviour.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191149.0;all
I had the full intention but was not given the means to pay immediately.
WinVery should be blacklisted for this comment, and for bidding for something he had no funds to cover. It's pretty obvious that he bid knowing that he could run up the price later. The problem was he was an ass about it. Boycott his gambling site too. Screw him.
I bid with the intention to immediately pay.
April 30, 2013, 08:27:25 AM
Anyone got payment received confirmation?
No.
April 30, 2013, 08:25:25 AM
Anyone got payment received confirmation?
April 30, 2013, 07:48:08 AM
Paid, TXID: 71d191651c9ed7c215d91e74bc90460101ffeeb84f5bebd698f165bda44b8df5
Thanks!
April 30, 2013, 05:53:46 AM
Here a more direct link if you don't want to read the full thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1954883
April 30, 2013, 05:52:34 AM
That should be avoided AT ALL COSTS, otherwise the auctions become a joke. Bidders have to honor their bids, and auctioneers have to honor the winners (I've seen a couple of auctions where the winner did not get the goods because the OP finally sold the goods by PM after the auction was over).
Im not sure why friedcat took out the rule for now but its a risk for sure.
The last thing you said sounds horrible. Was this person moved to scam accusations at least?
Don't think so, but I consider it appropriate. Just check one example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wts-avalon-batch-3-91xx-93xx-182343
April 30, 2013, 05:49:02 AM
That should be avoided AT ALL COSTS, otherwise the auctions become a joke. Bidders have to honor their bids, and auctioneers have to honor the winners (I've seen a couple of auctions where the winner did not get the goods because the OP finally sold the goods by PM after the auction was over).
Im not sure why friedcat took out the rule for now but its a risk for sure.
The last thing you said sounds horrible. Was this person moved to scam accusations at least?
that is really unfair way to conduct auction, people who did not posted one single bid during auction jumped in on last minute and out bidded others, just because they were unaware of what is going on. Now, some of them offering their positions for sale.
Please consider shipping my 10 blades I'll pay 510 btc.
Please consider shipping my 10 blades I'll pay 510 btc.
Thats sniping. And i think that should be forbidden. In fact i thought that will be the fact with this auction because somewhere i have read that the last bid extends the auction for 5 minutes. That would help to prevent sniping because other users can react on it after someone tried to snipe.
Maybe next time. Its no good for future auctions when parttakers in an auction have a bad experience.
Jump to: