Topic: Being a Smart Person or Strategic (Read 16989 times)
I would also agree that its a combination of both being smart and strategic because the determination of being smart to be is a function of being strategic on some specific things among the importance which include financial freedom and source of this is different and several people manage it differently the moment they are able to keep it together, then they are good at it.
Strategic it is the most important way or plan and general aspects of something.
Being smart and at the same time strategic person is not easy to handle. There are times that the decision you make is not going to what it is plan. But being smart and strategic person can lead you to make some creations and innovations that may developed from next generation.
Being smart and at the same time strategic person is not easy to handle. There are times that the decision you make is not going to what it is plan. But being smart and strategic person can lead you to make some creations and innovations that may developed from next generation.
For me, I think it is better to be strategic than to be smart. Strategy is frequently observed as something extremely smart individuals do — those leader of-the-class people with topnotch scholastic certifications. In any case, in light of the fact that these are the people pulled in to strategy doesn't mean they will normally exceed expectations at it.
The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
I agree with your opinion, I choose the strategy, I think it is more important. Of course, the combination of smart and strategy is very great, but not everyone can do it. As you said, building a strategy helps people cover the problem better. Without a strategy we will face many difficulties. Before we do something, we should build plan, clear strategies, build specific goals and jobs for increased success,The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
If i choose to be smart, then I will learn how to become a strategic person. These options, will only apply on a case by case basis. If I am at school then I choose to be a smart person and use my knowledge to be an honored person.
Being keen and being vital isn't a similar thing. Individuals might be keen however that isn't identified with how they procure. Being shrewd may not generally be useful for the individual on the grounds that multiple occassions they will be embarrassed too and their over-keenness may accomplish more mischief.
I think the smart person is a good thinker in every strategy he wants to make because they know all the ideas and possibilities of every decision he makes that can change their own lives. making it look for the safest investment in life. While a strategic person grows in experience and time. He learns the hard way that makes him stronger mentally and physically in making life or investment decisions. Either you avoid losing or pain by learning it first or embracing it so you can remember the lesson further
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Being a smart person is really good because in this way you can make your own decision not to fail on your goal while strategic person is like a jack of all cards and this person is not really good on anything.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Being a smart person is different from strategic person, most smart person will follow the rules because they are only good at one task or they focus on one task while those strategic person will think of different way to become more productive.
Being strategic is also being smart,but being smart on every strategy being a strategic person it will really works perfect.Choosing the right strategy is being smart,and being smart to use the strategy is best.So theres no need for comparison for this two traits,you need both of them
uote author=commlinx link=topic=2143949.msg35055197#msg35055197 date=1524115334]
For me, I think it is better to be strategic than to be smart. Strategy is frequently observed as something extremely smart individuals do — those leader of-the-class people with topnotch scholastic certifications. In any case, in light of the fact that these are the people pulled in to strategy doesn't mean they will normally exceed expectations at it.
The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
[/quote]
I think they should be partner both strategic and smart.Strategic person have many ideas,plans and aiming for thier achievments to fulfill, smart people used also thier intelligence
to think how to build some ideas.
For me, I think it is better to be strategic than to be smart. Strategy is frequently observed as something extremely smart individuals do — those leader of-the-class people with topnotch scholastic certifications. In any case, in light of the fact that these are the people pulled in to strategy doesn't mean they will normally exceed expectations at it.
The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
[/quote]
I think they should be partner both strategic and smart.Strategic person have many ideas,plans and aiming for thier achievments to fulfill, smart people used also thier intelligence
to think how to build some ideas.
For me, I think it is better to be strategic than to be smart. Strategy is frequently observed as something extremely smart individuals do — those leader of-the-class people with topnotch scholastic certifications. In any case, in light of the fact that these are the people pulled in to strategy doesn't mean they will normally exceed expectations at it.
The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
The issue with smart individuals is that they are accustomed to looking for and finding the correct answer; shockingly, in strategy there is no single right response to discover.
In my opinion, I think being strategic is a part of being smart. Because you won't be able to think of ways if you're a little too weak when it comes to making decisions and choices. But then, I guess there are a lot of definition of strategic & smart and this depends on how another person will define it
I think there are different kinds of smarts, and ultimately it comes down to your goals. Someone who is a mathematical genius may not be 'smart' with their money, and could end up broke.
I agree. There are these persons who are just smart in computations but when it comes to budgeting their consumption they failed. It is because a person must not only high in their IQ but they must also have high EQ or emotional quotience. It is how you can handle yourself in every situations. If you have a balance IQ and EQ then you will be both smart and strategic. There are many people who risk and don't know much what are doing but they suceced, at the other side there are many "experts" who are afraid to make investments and fail and make mistakes!
They were risktakers but most of them become successful on what they choose and if failure will comes there way they were able to overcome in it because they already know the risk involved on the fields that they choose.I think its all about a strong heart and minds to stand by our decisions even if we failed because someday we will learn from that mistakes and be more smarter in the next decisions that were going to take. I think it's the same things 
. When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart 
When you are smart then you can just think fast about the things that you can do in order to have a successful or good result while being strategic is being more than smart because when you are a strategic then you can think fast about the specific solution and not only the possible solution then you can just execute it with low risk of getting failure.. When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart This is purely simple. Guess what? The smartest person have the best strategy so they are actually both connected. How can we say that a good strategist beats the smart guy. Then that strategist must be smarter then?
For me being smart and strategic comes hand in hand. You can't be strategize effectively without being smart and vice versa. Planning is in between these two and I think it'll be more effective to try both hand in hand.
I think it's the same things . When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart
When you are smart then you can just think fast about the things that you can do in order to have a successful or good result while being strategic is being more than smart because when you are a strategic then you can think fast about the specific solution and not only the possible solution then you can just execute it with low risk of getting failure. . When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
In my opinion I prefer be a smart people with strategic actions. You can take strategic steps with smart calculations. this will make your business more successful.
Being a smart person isn't just enough if you ar3 not a strategic too. What is the value if you don't have any talent or skill to be a strategic. So i choose both of them because it is the very best combination skill that a person have.
I think it's the same things . When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart
. When you are smart you can easily make stragegy and get a success after, when you can do this that means you are smart Jump to: