you pool been added to http://digbtc.com
Neat, thanks!
Our name is actually "bitpit", is it possible to change that? No big deal either way.
done!
Topic: bit pit - (LP, ESMPPS, 8-decimal payout, SSL, API, 0% fee, Almost 0% Stales!) - page 7. (Read 80568 times)
July 24, 2011, 02:15:11 PM
Neat, thanks!
Our name is actually "bitpit", is it possible to change that? No big deal either way.
done!
July 24, 2011, 02:02:06 PM
you pool been added to http://digbtc.com
Neat, thanks!
Our name is actually "bitpit", is it possible to change that? No big deal either way.
July 24, 2011, 02:00:11 PM
you pool been added to http://digbtc.com
July 24, 2011, 01:48:23 PM
what about dynamic IPs?
parhaps you should increase the limit to (lets say) 50?!
parhaps you should increase the limit to (lets say) 50?!
Thank you for the suggestion, I've done so. Still though: if anyone really needs more than this, we can handle that, you just need to let us know.
July 24, 2011, 01:44:05 PM
what about dynamic IPs?
parhaps you should increase the limit to (lets say) 50?!
i have 25 GPUs with same dynamic IP, i think i am reaching the limit?
parhaps you should increase the limit to (lets say) 50?!
i have 25 GPUs with same dynamic IP, i think i am reaching the limit?
July 24, 2011, 01:28:10 PM
If any miner or proxy operator out there has a LOT of requests to us from the same IP (like more than 30 per second), or wants to set up such a proxy, please just let us know first so we can work out priority access. Otherwise, our proxy will likely drop your connections. If you suspect this is already happening to you, please PM me or email support with your IP.
July 24, 2011, 01:23:01 PM
I actually also get >5% stales using the latest poclbm by luke-jr, catalyst 11.6, sdk 2.4, ubuntu 11.04.
Yikes! That's not good...
I guess that's what we'll be working on today, then.
July 24, 2011, 12:38:34 PM
I actually also get >5% stales using the latest poclbm by luke-jr, catalyst 11.6, sdk 2.4, ubuntu 11.04.
Code:
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:00:42, 67d07587, _rejected_ 48 (Eff:6.73)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:00:50, 79461648, _rejected_ 48 (Eff:6.73)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:20, e6223209, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:22, baf86b5c, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:30, 9b851437, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:43, e89b8378, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:48, abcbd49d, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:55, c97f1d85, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:06:55, 7a1160f0, _rejected_
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:07:08, 331832ab, _rejected_ 53 (Eff:6.57)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:08:10, b15d15dd, _rejected_ 54 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:08:14, f6cf105d, _rejected_ 54 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:08:19, 586a7649, _rejected_ 54 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:08:20, 96eb1868, _rejected_ 54 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:24:13, long poll: IO error 67 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:24:14, LP connected to pool.bitp.it:8334 67 (Eff:6.52)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:29:32, long poll: new block 0000082b53a84405 71 (Eff:6.49)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:31:36, long poll: new block 00000133afb8a04d 73 (Eff:6.42)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:47:50, 13c9b852, _rejected_ 86 (Eff:6.40)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:52:53, 7b4be65c, _rejected_ 90 (Eff:6.32)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:52:54, d97349df, _rejected_ 90 (Eff:6.32)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 17:53:01, 26d6fe5c, _rejected_ 90 (Eff:6.32)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:01:41, bdad71cf, _rejected_ 97 (Eff:6.28)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:02:56, a9e1406a, _rejected_ 98 (Eff:6.24)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:03:02, bb5ed498, _rejected_ 98 (Eff:6.24)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:03:05, bb716a04, _rejected_ 98 (Eff:6.24)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:06:31, dd738ad8, _rejected_ 101 (Eff:6.17)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:06:33, 48a73be3, _rejected_ 101 (Eff:6.17)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:06:51, ae570e72, _rejected_ 101 (Eff:6.17)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:11:48, af734db8, _rejected_ 105 (Eff:6.21)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:11:50, bc0b4856, _rejected_ 105 (Eff:6.21)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:14:21, d1c9c700, ERROR (will resend) 107 (Eff:6.13)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:21:59, 1586401f, _rejected_ 113 (Eff:6.13)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:22:01, c3ea8f62, _rejected_ 113 (Eff:6.13)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:22:08, 6c63d1bb, _rejected_ 113 (Eff:6.13)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:31:37, long poll: IO error 121 (Eff:6.15)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:31:38, LP connected to pool.bitp.it:8334 121 (Eff:6.15)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 24/07/2011 18:35:08, long poll: new block 000004a6b287b636 124 (Eff:6.14)]
pool.bitp.it:8334 [373.537 MH/s (~396 MH/s Eff:6.92)] [Rej: 42/812 (5.17%)] [GW: 125 (Eff:6.16)]
July 24, 2011, 12:31:16 PM
Amazing pool. Keep up the good work!
July 24, 2011, 11:15:11 AM
I don't think that everything works fine, my actual stale rate is 1,4%. A week ago, I even had a stale rate of nearly 3%! I guess you still have to work on improving the stale rate 
cheers iro
cheers iro
That is actually far greater than our median stale rate. We'd love to know a little bit more about your particular setup, including your hash rate, geo-locality, and what miner you use.
We'd love to work with you to isolate the particular cause of your high stale rate.
July 24, 2011, 10:44:58 AM
I don't think that everything works fine, my actual stale rate is 1,4%. A week ago, I even had a stale rate of nearly 3%! I guess you still have to work on improving the stale rate
cheers iro
cheers iro
July 24, 2011, 10:07:36 AM
could you add also nest to
"Shares this round:"
the stale shares?
this could be a promotion
best xPPS pool!
"Shares this round:"
the stale shares?
this could be a promotion
best xPPS pool!
July 24, 2011, 10:04:53 AM
the only stales (actually they're invalid) i'm getting are from switching pools. Nice!
Thanks, we work hard for that. There are even more items on our TODO list that should drive the stales even lower.
July 24, 2011, 08:35:57 AM
the only stales (actually they're invalid) i'm getting are from switching pools. Nice!
July 24, 2011, 08:17:40 AM
ESMPPS is now active (since about 2 hours). And the hashrate already increased to 28GH/s again.
...so you guys ok with pool hoppers using you as backup then?
We have no problems with that. In fact, we hope you do. Our new ESMPPS reward scheme will ensure that everybody receives a far payment, and we encourage pool hoppers to hop back to us when there are no Prop pools worth sticking with
July 24, 2011, 06:01:14 AM
wish you all go well
i like the new method
backup, non-backup, it doesn't matter!
i like the new method
backup, non-backup, it doesn't matter!
July 24, 2011, 05:15:12 AM
ESMPPS is now active (since about 2 hours). And the hashrate already increased to 28GH/s again.
...so you guys ok with pool hoppers using you as backup then?
July 24, 2011, 04:53:55 AM
... and iill come back to your pool when fair reward will be given
ESMPPS is now active (since about 2 hours). And the hashrate already increased to 28GH/s again.
July 23, 2011, 10:17:04 PM
We have just deployed our ESMPPS implementation, and it will be active at the beginning of round 16.
Now all we have to do is solve this current block
Now all we have to do is solve this current block
July 23, 2011, 05:44:41 PM
14 GH/S?
Yesterday we was at 50..
Not really, the number was just hardcoded to 50 in the stats. Yesterday we was at 50..
Jump to: