Unfortunately, I was wrong with the Taylor vs Jack Catterall, because Jack scored a knock down on Taylor and it was really close and competitive fight.
But at the end, the judges score the fight to Taylor, but a split decision, 113-112 (2x) for Taylor and the other judge score it 114-111 for Catterall.
So there is a controversy here, there is a consensus that Jack Catterall should have won the fight and this could be a case of robbery.
Here what I have always said in boxing is fulfilled, some statistics are difficult to break, in many places Taylor was considered the winner, most of the comments both on social networks and in the videos themselves were negative towards him, in this meeting it was something that I liked a lot, I saw technique, power, some say it wasn't that good, (of course when you lose it's not a good thing) but this type of fight drives the industry a lot and makes it grow. In this case when we see bets a lot in favor of another boxer, we have to become the devil's advocate and see everything from the point of view contrary to the crowd, it may be that there is the way to make more money.But at the end, the judges score the fight to Taylor, but a split decision, 113-112 (2x) for Taylor and the other judge score it 114-111 for Catterall.
So there is a controversy here, there is a consensus that Jack Catterall should have won the fight and this could be a case of robbery.
