Dude, there's only two way to get Bitcoins:
-Mining them
-Being on the receiving part of a transaction.
If you want people to spend Bitcoins, they need to get them first. Mining already had a crazy impact on Bitcoin popularity, and giving a better accessibility will just add to this impact.
I'll be happy when my grand-mother will be able to mine her own Bitcoins to spend, not before.
silly me, i was under the impression there were wide and diverse means to get bitcoins. things like exchanges, otc markets, and to a lesser extent meat space exchanging. i must also be mistaken that people are acquiring bitcoin by selling services and products like on silkroad, bitmit and other online companies:
What do you think "Being on the receiving part of a transaction" meant?
yes, mining helped spread the popularity of bitcoin. i'm of the opinion that we've reaped the majority of the benefits there. sure, there may be some additional popularity gains to be gained from making mining more popular, but as mentioned, your not considering that the more popular mining gets, the less profitable it becomes. its a way forward that shoots itself in the face. show people that they can donate to wikileaks even though paypal and vc/mc tried shutting them down, show them they can pay for their offshore seedbox anonymously, show torrent sites they can accept donations and pay for their servers anonymously and be insulated from corporate payment processors actions, show individuals and companies that they can save a non negligable percentage on processing fees, and then use those same bitcoins to puchase items for their company and profits in bitcoin can be spent for their personal needs desires...then and only then will bitcoin start seeping more steadily, more permanently into the mainstream.
as long as the bulk of the bitcoin economy consists of miners dumping bitcoin on exchanges and speculators, it will remain fragile. strength and permanence will only be gained through broad and diverse use of bitcoin as a tool of commerce and money transfer.
You still need Bitcoins first before you donate or buy. Mining is the "click here to print money" button. For somebody who already have a computer running and consuming electricity, mining will not make a big difference and it is a easy and safe way to experiment and discover Bitcoins. It's not about mining with a profit, it's to educate with mining. Education and business is not the same thing, and have really different goals.
Every means that help spread Bitcoins in different pockets needs to be encouraged. And that include exchanges, shops, donations, lottery and yes, mining.
My point is that in time he won't be earning 3-4 BTC per month he will be getting 0.1 BTC per month "for free" and paying 20 BTC in electricity to get it.
Mining to educate about Bitcoins. I don't care if they pay too much electricity at first, they'll learn by themselves and they will take a decision accordingly. But at that point, they'll know what Bitcoin is, they will probably have a couple of Bitcoins and they will continue to read and learn by themselves. The biggest obstacle for Bitcoin is having a wallet with 0 BTC.