....
If you look up the definition for gambling, I think no matter how you twist it, it does require a stake of some sort. Money is one thing here but you could as well use your car or a watch, but if nothing of value is involved, how could it fulfill the definition of gambling?
Ironically of you look up for the definition of gambling, you will realize that it can vary pretty much depending on the cultural and religious setting we are talking about. There are religious families and communities which do not allow their children to play any tabletop games because the inclusion of dices, regardless they use of fake money of paper money, in the eyes of of those religious leaders and the elders of the community, the dole use of a dice to determine a random result is sinful enough to be avoided at any cost.
So, depending whom you ask, the risk of gambling could not be directly associated with the loss of material
things like money or property, but a direct association of supernatural and evil forces which could be in control of the dice or whatever object is being used to generate the randomes of the game. It transcends the wager.
To me, there is still some elements of gambling even if the money is worthless or fake, as wagering fake money could still activate the producticion of neurotransmitters within our brain, which could or not cause a long standing addiction, or make people move onto gambling with real money.
Yes but my answer didn't exclude the option that something immaterial could be on the line and the example you brought up explains that. But I think there is a difference between rolling the dice being a sin compared to skin in the game of any kind, whether that be money or reputation or whatever. When you do something against your inner belief or whatever rules you impose on yourself (or your parents etc.), it doesn't really have to do with gambling unless you bet on you rolling the dice not being discovered by your parents
What you are referring is closer to breaking a law than putting something on the line, although I would say what you said makes sense to some degree. If I drive a car without a driving license, I am actually taking a gamble there, but I definitely have something to lose. You could argue that someone gambling in a country where it is not allowed is actually losing esteem, but the difference is that it is not the result of the dice that counts, but the fact whether or not someone catches you.
fake money could still activate the producticion of neurotransmitters within our brain, which could or not cause a long standing addiction
Ok sure, but discussing biochemistry for different individuals is probably taking it too far here. That would never allow us to draw a half way reasonable line. You could always argue that if someone rolls the dice with nothing on the line, you could probably still measure at least minuscule biochemical activity and then it would be deemed gambling since your brain shows a reaction.
What I certainly agree with though is that getting new players on a platform offering them fake money to get used to the platform is beyond doubt effective. But then again we are more discussing about consequences whereas I would say that playing with fake money is still not gambling as per a closer definition. In the broadest sense, well then maybe yes.