I agree, we should stick to the plan. Things may not be looking good at this point but, the way the Team is handling the development is great. Wallet is ready halfway before the ICO period ended. And besides this change in plan midway might be the reason for FUD to come into this thread, so if you ask me let's finish the ICO period, just set a parameter to which you can declare ICO is succesful or a failure then move to next plan.
That's the main problem when ICO coins change terms. Expect lots of FUD ... no reason to give an excuse for FUD this early in a coin's existence. If the coin is a success and the devs need extra btc, can always do a 2nd ICO like a year from now, that sort of thing ... backgammon coin, and so on...
Even coins with god awful ICO setups (Elastic Coin), stuck to their original plan. And they went through like 3 devs, shady terms, lots of FUD (for other reasons), and three (or four) different threads here. If anyone had an excuse to do over their ICO, it was them ... but they kept going.
I put it as an avatar. Way to go ChessCoin Dev. As usual earlier than expected. It is a great thing the Chesscoin Dev Team deliver ahead of time. There are lots that ICO's out there that collects huge amount of money and lots of promises but under deliver. 
