Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1188. (Read 6590565 times)

Do you have the right proxy version set? suprnova is finicky.

I have been trying to get this miner to run with my RX 480s today.
I dont seem to get the batch file to work, i feel stupid because i have been doing this alot during the years.

I want to mine eth at suprnova, could someone help me sort out a batch file ?

If i run the original batch file that comes with the miner it is starting up right away but when i change something in it the miner cant connect to the pool.

More CUs and bandwidth are not important for ETH, memory latency is the key.

Claymore, I am still curious why the 290X and Fury X hashrates are identical, after all, fury X has many more CUs and higher memory bandwidth.

Ah you want to merge-mine SIA at Suprnova.. Unfortunately the stratum protocol is not yet integrated into Claymore as far as I know, you can only mine ETC / DCR fully on Suprnova currently.

hey guys, I don't know what to do with this error. I've got r9 280x windows 7 x64

if I restart the miner everything is fine but from time to time I get this error and sia mining stops while eth goes just fine.

at first I get this:
13:48:49:091   1360    SC: http error #28.
13:48:49:091   1360    SC: Failed to connect to pool (sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980), retry in 10 sec...

and then after alot of tries this

 SIA: incorrect job data size
SIAD invalid http response, wrong number of bytes received: 36
Response: {"message":"404 - Refer to API.md"}

here's my failover:

POOL: sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980, WALLET: 5b63e39d182f778640a9165350eed3590a28e61a60a8583735c767e0c057b792e42033b978c4/worker, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: sia-eu2.nanopool.org:9980, WALLET: 5b63e39d182f778640a9165350eed3590a28e61a60a8583735c767e0c057b792e42033b978c4/worker, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: sia-us-east1.nanopool.org:9980, WALLET: 5b63e39d182f778640a9165350eed3590a28e61a60a8583735c767e0c057b792e42033b978c4/worker, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: stratum+tcp://siamining.com:3333, WALLET: 5b63e39d182f778640a9165350eed3590a28e61a60a8583735c767e0c057b792e42033b978c4.wo rker, PSW: x, ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: siamining.com:9980, WALLET: 5b63e39d182f778640a9165350eed3590a28e61a60a8583735c767e0c057b792e42033b978c4.wo rker, PSW: x, ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0

any ideas?

all you have there is
Suprnova's SiaCoin Pool // Algo: blake2b // Live !

stratum+tcp://sia.suprnova.cc:2786

20% Bonus for every Block !

Use this SGMiner for mining !

..but it does not work with Claymore anymore.. please provide the full string if you can..
thank you

UPDATE: -dpool stratum+tcp://sia.suprnova.cc:2786 -dwal g___o.sia -dpsw x -dcoin sc -dcri 44           -this works in ver 5.1 Beta2 ..atleast I can see the hasrate in CDM, but didnt see any stats at supernova
..in ver. 5.3 does not work

I have the string for claymore posted in bold in the header of the pool,  did you try that?

Is it stable and worth in solo mining in the close future? Can I use it on the system I use daily or am advised to run it from a dedicated server instead? I would like to use it with an EVGA GeForce GTX 1080, but if I cannot run it on my daily system, I would use it with a Radeon R9 Nano in a server provided it supports them.

EDIT: I think, I will wait the solution of the below mentioned error messages before usage :/

EDIT2: Alrighty. Support is lively at this one. Thank you!

Yeh.. But how do I mine Sia startum with Claymore as the second coin? It was possible before..!

Try:

https://etc.suprnova.cc

Efficiency is > 99 %, stratums in multiple locations and if you're still having problems, just come into #suprnova IRC on freenet and we'll find out whats wrong.

The following pool is an excellent pool originally set up for ETH but we are now mining ETC.  I've been on here approximately 24 hours.  Payouts are every 4 hours.  Pool fee is 1%.

http://miningeth.com

EDIT #1:  I use my Poloniex ETC Deposit address as my wallet address for now and it has worked fine.

EDIT #2:  I've earned 46.61832836 ETC over the past 24 hours with 1.44 GH.  Not bad for my first 24 hours there.  I pointed my rigs there at approximately 2:30am CST yesterday.  It is currently 2:47am CST (approximately 24 hours).

EDIT #3:  I'm adding one more rig later today with 6 x RX 480's on an MSI gaming mother board and I have 5 more RX 480's on the way to get up and running by Friday or Saturday.  The goal is 102 RX 480's to go along with the 74 x R9 380's I already have.

When I add my current 11 x RX 480's, that will put us right at 1% of the ETC network hash rate.  We could use more miners if any wish to join.  Keith, is an excellent pool operator.  He knows his shiznit.  Your in good hands with him.

Most all of us at the pool have [Or will be] switching from ethos to awesome miner awesomeminer.com [Which uses Claymore when mining ETH or ETC] to enable us to jump around to whatever alt coin we want to mine, which see: http://awesomeminer.com/guide/awesomeprofit.aspx.  I plan on having all my rigs running awesomeminer by next weekend.

Which ETC pool is best for you? I tried many pools, the rejection is between 15 to 30%. So I gave up.l

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15727385

the sky is falling on the ETH price -- no thanks to her evil twin ETC (depending on how you look at it)

if only there is a pool that do ETH and ETC at the same but pays miners for both.... hmmm 

Hey,

It probably already been answered, but this pool: https://siamining.com/stratum is now supporting stratum. I tried some config around with the claymore miner.

It is connecting, but I receive a red error message.

Anyways the http is working fine.

Thanks!

@ Claymore

How about instead of "new job" show last block number. So if any doubt, i can check if miner is chewing on right job.

ETH and SIA calculations are pretty much ok, for ETH I was getting best results on Dwarfpool.
For now ETC network is extremely volatile with some pool disconnects, orphans and stales. It will sort out in time for sure.

Thank you and thevictimofuktyranny

The nanopool estimations are wrong, I am getting something closer to the calculator rate at the moment. I have no idea why nanopool estimations are far from what we are mining with them.

Take the time to calculate your gains for 24h, you will see it's much higher than what Nanopool is estimating for you.