Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1279. (Read 6590565 times)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Actually... Why not just mine on Dwarfpool anyway? Although I think someone mentioned earlier about lower hashrate? Maybe that's the reason? I only went with Ethermine because it was the first pool I found out about. Tongue

I was on Dwarfpool but about 10 hours ago I started seeing problems with the connection, some stratum disconnections or something, so the only solution I could see is to move out if even for the time being. I'm running 9 pieces of R9 380 in total.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
@ Claymore curious as to why my 7950's are faster than my r9 280x?
This happens when you don't have 15.12 drivers.
Either upgrade to 15.12 or force the 280x to "slow card" mode (-etha 1)
280x is @ 15 Mhs with pre 15.12 and auto detection instead of 20 Mhs

Already using 15.12 drivers and -etha 1
7950
ETH: GPU0 20.727 Mh/s, GPU1 20.744 Mh/s, GPU2 20.721 Mh/s, GPU3 20.428 Mh/s
280x
ETH: GPU0 19.186 Mh/s, GPU1 20.702 Mh/s, GPU2 18.711 Mh/s, GPU3 19.417 Mh/s, GPU
4 19.427 Mh/s

All gpu's clocked at 1100/1500
Maybe dram timings are not good in your 280x biosses. I got 20.7 Mhz @ 1050/1500 with my 280x (refence cards, with or without stilt biosses)
It's not heat related for the 280x ? If not, it's probably less performing dram modules (compare with gpu-z which dram do you have)

Your 7950 are working great. The only ones i got that work that well are msi ones; it's dram related

I think ur right, 7950 rig has 3 msi all with hynix mem, gpu3 is actually an mis r9 380 with elipdia mem. Interestingly gpu3 is actually my fastest jumping between 20.4 and "GPU3 21.485 Mh/s"
280x are all elipdia except gpu1 which is hynix, no idea why gpu2 on 280x rig is slower than the rest.

Has anyone tried tweaking timinig on elipdia cards bios?
full member
Activity: 185
Merit: 100
@ Claymore curious as to why my 7950's are faster than my r9 280x?
This happens when you don't have 15.12 drivers.
Either upgrade to 15.12 or force the 280x to "slow card" mode (-etha 1)
280x is @ 15 Mhs with pre 15.12 and auto detection instead of 20 Mhs

Already using 15.12 drivers and -etha 1
7950
ETH: GPU0 20.727 Mh/s, GPU1 20.744 Mh/s, GPU2 20.721 Mh/s, GPU3 20.428 Mh/s
280x
ETH: GPU0 19.186 Mh/s, GPU1 20.702 Mh/s, GPU2 18.711 Mh/s, GPU3 19.417 Mh/s, GPU
4 19.427 Mh/s

All gpu's clocked at 1100/1500
Maybe dram timings are not good in your 280x biosses. I got 20.7 Mhz @ 1050/1500 with my 280x (refence cards, with or without stilt biosses)
It's not heat related for the 280x ? If not, it's probably less performing dram modules (compare with gpu-z which dram do you have)

Your 7950 are working great. The only ones i got that work that well are msi ones; it's dram related
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Actually... Why not just mine on Dwarfpool anyway? Although I think someone mentioned earlier about lower hashrate? Maybe that's the reason? I only went with Ethermine because it was the first pool I found out about. Tongue

I mentioned about low returns on dwarfpool, hashrate was reported fine but was getting only ~70% of expected returns for given hashrate. Switching to coinotron and i now have 90+% of expected return for my hash rate.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
@ Claymore curious as to why my 7950's are faster than my r9 280x?
This happens when you don't have 15.12 drivers.
Either upgrade to 15.12 or force the 280x to "slow card" mode (-etha 1)
280x is @ 15 Mhs with pre 15.12 and auto detection instead of 20 Mhs

Already using 15.12 drivers and -etha 1
7950
ETH: GPU0 20.727 Mh/s, GPU1 20.744 Mh/s, GPU2 20.721 Mh/s, GPU3 20.428 Mh/s
280x
ETH: GPU0 19.186 Mh/s, GPU1 20.702 Mh/s, GPU2 18.711 Mh/s, GPU3 19.417 Mh/s, GPU
4 19.427 Mh/s

All gpu's clocked at 1100/1500
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
Vertcoin stealthy master race.
Actually... Why not just mine on Dwarfpool anyway? Although I think someone mentioned earlier about lower hashrate? Maybe that's the reason? I only went with Ethermine because it was the first pool I found out about. Tongue
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
Vertcoin stealthy master race.
Hmm... That is strange. I'm not sure. I'm not saying to keep it this way of course... But try only putting in my config and not changing it to make sure it'll start mining. Only because I know it's working for me. Although you may have tried that already...

What GPU are you using? Perhaps it's not adequate for Eth mining? I'm on 2 R9 270's.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I can't seem to mine on ethermine, can anyone mining on there share their configs with me? Cheesy thank you!

Yeah, absolutely. Here's my config for just ethermine. Nothing "custom", just the proper link, and my wallet address. Just sub in your own address instead of mine, of course.


EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x70c06E09AE5A2b8ECa5863C68b725adadCefF5cb -epsw x

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would really recommend mining both Decred and Ethereum. You don't sacrifice any speed for either, really. Here's my entire config for dual mining. Sign up for supernova pool for simplicity because it's already set up that way in my config maybe...

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x70c06E09AE5A2b8ECa5863C68b725adadCefF5cb -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 -dwal BitJunkie556.worker1 -dpsw x

Oh... And one thing I found useful. I couldn't get Decred to dual mine at first. I then realized that I had to put in my worker, EXACTLY as it said. That included the capitals on my main account name, as you can hopefully see above. "BitJunkie556.worker1", as opposed to "bitjunkie556.worker1"...

 I hope that helped and that you can get up and running. Smiley






Doesn't work Sad I can mine fine on dwarfpool and coinotron but not ethermine weirdly =\
https://i.imgur.com/l6o3DtY.png
full member
Activity: 185
Merit: 100
@ Claymore curious as to why my 7950's are faster than my r9 280x?
This happens when you don't have 15.12 drivers.
Either upgrade to 15.12 or force the 280x to "slow card" mode (-etha 1)
280x is @ 15 Mhs with pre 15.12 and auto detection instead of 20 Mhs
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
@ Claymore curious as to why my 7950's are faster than my r9 280x?
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
Vertcoin stealthy master race.
I can't seem to mine on ethermine, can anyone mining on there share their configs with me? Cheesy thank you!

Yeah, absolutely. Here's my config for just ethermine. Nothing "custom", just the proper link, and my wallet address. Just sub in your own address instead of mine, of course.


EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x70c06E09AE5A2b8ECa5863C68b725adadCefF5cb -epsw x

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would really recommend mining both Decred and Ethereum. You don't sacrifice any speed for either, really. Here's my entire config for dual mining. Sign up for supernova pool for simplicity because it's already set up that way in my config maybe...

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x70c06E09AE5A2b8ECa5863C68b725adadCefF5cb -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 -dwal BitJunkie556.worker1 -dpsw x

Oh... And one thing I found useful. I couldn't get Decred to dual mine at first. I then realized that I had to put in my worker, EXACTLY as it said. That included the capitals on my main account name, as you can hopefully see above. "BitJunkie556.worker1", as opposed to "bitjunkie556.worker1"...

 I hope that helped and that you can get up and running. Smiley




newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I can't seem to mine on ethermine, can anyone mining on there share their configs with me? Cheesy thank you!
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Only a fool worries over what he can’t control.
Why GPUs numbering under Claymores Dual are differ from GPU-Z or MSI afterburner?
In known issues:
GPU indexes in temperature control sometimes don't match GPU indexes in mining. Miner has to enumerate GPUs via OpenCL API to execute OpenCL code, and also it has to enumerate GPUs via ADL API to manage temperature/clock.
And order of GPUs in these lists can be different. There is no way to fix GPUs order automatically, thanks to AMD devs.

But you can do it manually. For example, if you have two cards, you can change their order by adding "-di 10". Another example, reverse order for six cards: "-di 543210"

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
By the time you get the new card, you will mine the same amount with the same price as the difficulty will be much higher.

You have a valid point there.  By the time they come out and a ginny pig spends $200 to find out if it will mine ETH and we get word of it, it's quite possible my 3,000 MH/s from 100 x MSI 390's will have mined approximately $10,000 worth of ETH at current difficulty, block time and price of ETH.

That's $10,000 towards a $34,000 to $35,000 investment.  That investment could be paid off in 4 months.

I'm an ignoramus as to how ETH works.  Any idea who or what determines when ETH changes from POW to POS?  Of course, I could research to find out for myself.  However, if someone knows the answer, I would appreciate the info.


I was researching this topic earlier this year and find this link best to explain POS/Casper and Life after POW.

http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/3523/how-do-miners-profit-post-pos-if-at-all-how-will-new-miners-get-their-start-a?rq=1


Hi citronick,

Thanks for the two links you provided in your two posts.  Much appreciated! 

Earlier this year, I invested a handsome sum on my ETH rigs. With this POS thing looming. I did my own study --- I even drop a PM to Vitalik to ask him when is POS date and got no response (LOL... I am so noob)... after talking to several senior members who have rigs and farms themselves in US and Europe, I found the right strategy and exit plan.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
By the time you get the new card, you will mine the same amount with the same price as the difficulty will be much higher.

You have a valid point there.  By the time they come out and a ginny pig spends $200 to find out if it will mine ETH and we get word of it, it's quite possible my 3,000 MH/s from 100 x MSI 390's will have mined approximately $10,000 worth of ETH at current difficulty, block time and price of ETH.

That's $10,000 towards a $34,000 to $35,000 investment.  That investment could be paid off in 4 months.

I'm an ignoramus as to how ETH works.  Any idea who or what determines when ETH changes from POW to POS?  Of course, I could research to find out for myself.  However, if someone knows the answer, I would appreciate the info.



Its simple really.

They will release the new software for nodes to update to and if they mine then wont update and POS will be delayed.  The guys at ETH put a difficulty bomb to make mining impossibility hard in the future so the majority will update or the network will freeze and kill the coin.  In crypto generally once 51% of the network decides to use a update then it becomes official, its like share holders making a vote in a publicly traded company.

Sounds like all of us need to begin kick starting our own ETH nodes to have a vote to keep the mining going a bit.  eh?   Grin
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
By the time you get the new card, you will mine the same amount with the same price as the difficulty will be much higher.

You have a valid point there.  By the time they come out and a ginny pig spends $200 to find out if it will mine ETH and we get word of it, it's quite possible my 3,000 MH/s from 100 x MSI 390's will have mined approximately $10,000 worth of ETH at current difficulty, block time and price of ETH.

That's $10,000 towards a $34,000 to $35,000 investment.  That investment could be paid off in 4 months.

I'm an ignoramus as to how ETH works.  Any idea who or what determines when ETH changes from POW to POS?  Of course, I could research to find out for myself.  However, if someone knows the answer, I would appreciate the info.


I was researching this topic earlier this year and find this link best to explain POS/Casper and Life after POW.

http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/3523/how-do-miners-profit-post-pos-if-at-all-how-will-new-miners-get-their-start-a?rq=1


Hi citronick,

Thanks for the two links you provided in your two posts.  Much appreciated! 
sr. member
Activity: 326
Merit: 250
Why GPUs numbering under Claymores Dual are differ from GPU-Z or MSI afterburner?
For example - my rig with six R9 380 cards: - one card has temperature 80C, rest five 68C. In GPU-Z is this hot card on the first place, under MSI Afterburner is GPU1 (numbering starts from 1), but under Claymores Dual SW 4.5 is this card GPU4. Why ??
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
I have 2 sapphire 280x some of my best cards they run super cool and have never had an issue in over 2 years. I suspect your expecting too much from such low end cards sure they may have done 18Mh/s each some time ago when the dag was smaller but they will continue to drop in performance as dag grows.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
By the time you get the new card, you will mine the same amount with the same price as the difficulty will be much higher.

You have a valid point there.  By the time they come out and a ginny pig spends $200 to find out if it will mine ETH and we get word of it, it's quite possible my 3,000 MH/s from 100 x MSI 390's will have mined approximately $10,000 worth of ETH at current difficulty, block time and price of ETH.

That's $10,000 towards a $34,000 to $35,000 investment.  That investment could be paid off in 4 months.

I'm an ignoramus as to how ETH works.  Any idea who or what determines when ETH changes from POW to POS?  Of course, I could research to find out for myself.  However, if someone knows the answer, I would appreciate the info.








Its simple really.

They will release the new software for nodes to update to and if they mine then wont update and POS will be delayed.  The guys at ETH put a difficulty bomb to make mining impossibility hard in the future so the majority will update or the network will freeze and kill the coin.  In crypto generally once 51% of the network decides to use a update then it becomes official, its like share holders making a vote in a publicly traded company.
hero member
Activity: 1308
Merit: 508
Hey guys,

I'm about to buy a 295x2 but still have some questions.

It's a Sapphire one.


What speed should it get with claymores miner on ETH only Windows 7? Do you think 60 MH/s is realistic?

What core clock, mem clock, voltage should I run it?

Anyone got a rough estimation of the power consumption for ETH only? My rough estimations tells me ~ 350 Watts under full load.

Is the stock hybrid cooler strong enough to hold the card below 75 degrees celsius?




WHATEVER you do, don't use Sapphire for mining... It seems like everyone and their brother, sister, and mother, are having issues mining with Sapphire cards...

I thought with my R9 270's (2 of them) ~36MH would be my max. I haven't seen it yet.

I'm getting about 25MH/s Ethereum, about 380MH/s on Decred. I can get about 26MH/s in Eth only, but it's worth it to mine decred alongside ethereum. Keep in mind, that's considerably overclocked. Stock on mine is 900-925 Core Clock, 1400 Mem clock. I have it at 1050Mhz Core, 1500mhz Memory.


My two cards together probably use about 350 watts. I would think a 295x2 would use at LEAST 500 watts. Make sure you have a hefty power supply.

As for your expected mining speed... It's hard to really say. Two r9 270's are definitely more powerful than a single 290. So if I'm getting ~26MH/s, I'd imagine you'd get closer to 40. Maybe 45MH/s with a heavy overclock. But again, the problem is that I keep hearing nothing but complaints about Sapphire for mining...

Could you perhaps go with two R9 290's, non-Sapphire?

I don't want to hate on Sapphire. I used to have a passively-cooled HD5450 that I ran pretty hard. I now use it in my HTPC build. I love the thing, even now. But when you hear nothing but problems about a certain manufacturer in this particular usage... I can't help but recommend against it. I remember a thread on the ethereum forum where a guy had like 6 Sapphire cards for mining. Multiple failed within the first couple weeks. Not a good sign...

I run so many cards... and most of them are Sapphire ones. Never had any problems (except one fan that's stuck and doesn't move anymore).

I have:

2 x Sapphire HD 6990 @ 20 MH/s each
2 x Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ 20 MH/s each
1 x Sapphire R9 270X Toxic @ 15 MH/s
1 x Sapphire HD 6970 @ 10 MH/s
1 x Asus HD 6970 @ 10 MH/s

(all cards above consume together 1380W at the wall including one system)

And now I bought the Sapphire R9 295x2.


One 280X consumes exactly 170 watts.
A 290X might be like 190-200.
That means a 295x2 should be 380 - 400 Watts.

All my cards are currently connected to a Rosewill Hercules 1600W which is doing pretty fine at 1380 at the wall.

I put the 270X on a second PSU (-110 Watts) and add the 295x2 to the Rosewill. Should be fine.


Regarding the performance.
I have seen different stats... 290X's between 26 and 32 MH/s.
Let's say 28 MH/s would mean 56 MH/s on the 295x2 - that's okay.


I gonna run it at like 1050-1060 MHz... but I don't know whats the lowest voltage level it will run.. It's always annoying to figure it out..

So has anyone any experience with the voltage on this card?
Jump to: