But stability is the clue, so see you tomorrow
and more important with ethminer @dwarfpool I had about 0,8eth/day last time so I'll be able to compare soon real worth..
#EDIT:
I am using 4.2 beta
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1327. (Read 6590565 times)
May 10, 2016, 06:13:37 PM
Today my ethminer crashes so I decided to try CDM on my own ring (my last posts was about friends rigs) and it looks very promising.. 73mhs compare to 71-75mhs eth + 1000mhs on decred at default..
But stability is the clue, so see you tomorrow
and more important with ethminer @dwarfpool I had about 0,8eth/day last time so I'll be able to compare soon real worth..
#EDIT:
I am using 4.2 beta
But stability is the clue, so see you tomorrow
and more important with ethminer @dwarfpool I had about 0,8eth/day last time so I'll be able to compare soon real worth..
#EDIT:
I am using 4.2 beta
May 10, 2016, 03:52:02 PM
Is there a way to NOT send 'reported hashrate' to ethermine.org? That feature adds a focus grabbing green bar to the charts there that makes it difficult to get the popup numbers I actually want to see.
Use undocumented option "-erate 0". Available in all v4.x. It will be documented in next update.
May 10, 2016, 03:48:57 PM
Is there a way to NOT send 'reported hashrate' to ethermine.org? That feature adds a focus grabbing green bar to the charts there that makes it difficult to get the popup numbers I actually want to see.
May 10, 2016, 03:33:40 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late.
Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such.
1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH
2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2
1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12
pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
4 rigs
2- 5x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1700 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10
2- 4x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1600 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10
pulling 564.6 MH
Its already too late for you. You'll never get ROI. Diff grows and grows
Hashrate with 5 Cards is slow. What is your power consumption?
Are they switching to POS tmrw? If the price goes up t $20 & I get 1 Eth per day (even if it doesn't), sounds like I'll come out on the + side. I'm already the possible 1500 minimum to participate in POS. so anything from here on out is icing. There seems to be an ideal that when the switch to POS that the world will come to a screeching halt. Not targeting anyone in particular but I think a person would be naive to not acknowledge the risks. Me, I'm in already in and hitting it until they carry me out on a stretcher. Thanks for your input.
May 10, 2016, 03:20:34 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late.
Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such.
1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH
2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2
1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12
pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
I got sum 270x to. First i test it with only eth. I get 14.8 mhs ( thats poor when i compare it with other miner, i get around 16) but when i switch to dual mining i get 15.5 for eth and 240 for dcr.
Is there a minimum for ram on AMD boards? Noticed Intel requires 16gb, I've got box of 1gb RAM sticks that I will use for the AMD rig...
Can anyone recommend a cpu for this Intel board? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128860&ignorebbr=1 > Only used AMD up to this point, I'll go out tmrw and p/u. Would like to get one rig up & running tonight.
May 10, 2016, 03:14:23 PM
Nice work. With v3.0 i have 100% eth hashrate + 33% dcr hashrate per card and near 0%/2% rejects respectively.
Are there any plans to add vcash (Blake algo) mining in dual mode?
Are there any plans to add vcash (Blake algo) mining in dual mode?
Yes I'd like vcash support too
Yea, the blake algo is superlight!
You can actually run it with claymores dualminer .. just sacrifice some.
Im sure this could be programmed to work in better synergy.
With the BLC mergepool .. you could then mine 8 coins at the same time.
ETH
DCR
BLC-Merged
PHO-Merged
BBTC-Merged
ELT-Merged
LIT-Merged
UMO-Merged
What do you mean by "you can actually run it with claymores dualminer ?"
Meant "at the same time as"
Like this screenshot. Im not pushing the rig because of a bad PSU waiting for replacement. But from 110mh eth usually to 108ish while running blake mergemining.
Running low 1-2 ethi and around 28 dcri and only intensity 3 on the blakeminer.
If you run the regular ethminer you can push the blake pretty high.
In this screen there's 8 coins beeing mined simultaneously
May 10, 2016, 02:50:29 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late.
Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such.
1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH
2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2
1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12
pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
4 rigs
2- 5x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1700 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10
2- 4x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1600 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10
pulling 564.6 MH
Its already too late for you. You'll never get ROI. Diff grows and grows
Hashrate with 5 Cards is slow. What is your power consumption?
May 10, 2016, 02:17:03 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late.
Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such.
1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH
2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2
1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12
pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
I got sum 270x to. First i test it with only eth. I get 14.8 mhs ( thats poor when i compare it with other miner, i get around 16) but when i switch to dual mining i get 15.5 for eth and 240 for dcr.
May 10, 2016, 02:09:52 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late.
Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such.
1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH
2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2
1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12
pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
May 10, 2016, 01:06:12 PM
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
Code:
"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}";
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
Miner does not send hashrate in http mode. I thought it is useless. So you can see sum hashrates from all ethminers somehow? Explain how you do it and I will check it.
I send JSON-RPC request to my wallet described here https://ethereum.gitbooks.io/frontier-guide/content/rpc.html and then read response with javax.json.*
Code:
Returns the number of hashes per second that the node is mining with.
Parameters
none
Returns
QUANTITY - number of hashes per second.
Example
// Request
curl -X POST --data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate","params":[],"id":71}'
// Result
{
"id":71,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": "0x38a"
}
Parameters
none
Returns
QUANTITY - number of hashes per second.
Example
// Request
curl -X POST --data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate","params":[],"id":71}'
// Result
{
"id":71,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": "0x38a"
}
May 10, 2016, 12:55:11 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
May 10, 2016, 12:48:17 PM
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
May 10, 2016, 12:45:18 PM
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
Code:
"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}";
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
Miner does not send hashrate in http mode. I thought it is useless. So you can see sum hashrates from all ethminers somehow? Explain how you do it and I will check it.
May 10, 2016, 12:40:09 PM
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
Code:
"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}";
Maybe you can look at this issue ?
May 10, 2016, 12:22:12 PM
How to make this16gb virtual memory? And where?
Could it be reason for low 280/370/380 series amd, hashrate?
Ok I found but what consequences could have to small size?
Could it be reason for low 280/370/380 series amd, hashrate?
Ok I found but what consequences could have to small size?
If you have small virtual memory and some of your GPU cannot be recognised by the miner and cannot mine.
May 10, 2016, 12:11:23 PM
getting about 18-21 mh /s for eth and 480-520mh for dcr ethi 8 and dcri 50.
How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
For me the sweet spot is with ethi 16 and dcri 30. That's the combination that will produce a better ETH/DCR balance in my rigs
May 10, 2016, 11:49:20 AM
getting about 18-21 mh /s for eth and 480-520mh for dcr ethi 8 and dcri 50.
How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
May 10, 2016, 11:40:46 AM
Claymore, is this fix relevant to your miner
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
My miner does not use any sources from ethminer, so any bugs/fixes related to ethminer are not related to my miner.
Yes, I was just curious about the underlying idea, that sometimes 'a nonce matches with previous headerHash but is submitted with new headerHash resulting low difficulty share' These shares could find blocks and uncles.
Looking forward to your next version with remote management
Thanks. May 10, 2016, 11:32:36 AM
Claymore, is this fix relevant to your miner
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
My miner does not use any sources from ethminer, so any bugs/fixes related to ethminer are not related to it.
May 10, 2016, 11:12:19 AM
Claymore, is this fix relevant to your miner
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/issues/36
It could fix some low difficulty shares, at least in ethminer.
Jump to: