Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 325. (Read 6590565 times)

jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!

I know others have given some answers on this.
I use this a normal starting point for adjusting my rig.
These are the first tings you should have done.


1st - Make minor voltage decreases in both clocks. Memory and GPU. Separately, adjust them one at a time.
Test it. See what the temp is when mining by using a utility like GPU-Z.
If you get to low the board will stop working.
Keep adjusting to lower the temp.

Try setting the  -eth value to 8 to start, then lower it down one number at a time when testing.
This adjusts the intensity. It will lower the hash rate, but lower numbers will make the GPU run cooler.

Make settings similar to these in the config file.
Your numbers will vary from what mine are shown here.


-tt 67                      # Sets desired temp for a GPU
-ttli 72                    # Sets the max temp for a GPU before miner automatically starts reducing intensity. This will allow the GPU to run a little cooler but still keep running.
-tstop 75                 # Turn GPU off if this temp is reached until the temp gets to the value in -tstart, then start it up again
-tstart 65                # Temp to start mining again if -tstop temp was reached

Be patient It's takes some time and work to fine tune your rig.
If you didn't do testing and monitoring like the above then you probably didn't set it up correctly from the beginning.


full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...

Agreed about AMD cards. But I tested Phoenix and ethminer today. Phoenix is too slow. Ethminer is more stable, but has less hasrate then Claymore. Thinking about ethminer. May be will run it in one day to see result. But now I'm still using Claymore 10.6.

Ethminer for my nvidia rigs is the best. Very stable and consistent hashrate, no drops like Claymore. And my accepted hasrate on pool is quite always above my reported. But need more time to tweek gpus memory, what is good for Claymore and Phoenix, is not good for ethminer = neccessary to find new frequencies.
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...

Agreed about AMD cards. But I tested Phoenix and ethminer today. Phoenix is too slow. Ethminer is more stable, but has less hasrate then Claymore. Thinking about ethminer. May be will run it in one day to see result. But now I'm still using Claymore 10.6.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...
newbie
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
I am using a modded BIOS and have core voltage = -43mv in afterburner
I want to use Claymore for controlling this and wish to use -cvddc
However I am unsure how to translate the -43mv in AB to claymore- since there are differing voltages at different core clock in the bios whereas in claymore only one voltage is entered.

My bios voltages are as below

MHZ   mV
300   750
588   850
900   850
950   840
980   850
1000   860
1050   870
1100   890
1150   900
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
nah, save the hassle. reverted back to v11

no matter what i do with downclocking, i always get random incorrect shares. i dont know whats up with this higher hashrates on latest claymores, but its randomly throwing me a lot of incorrect shares.
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
I am moving to Phoenix too, dual mining becomes unprofitable, miner is unstable, devfee is huge for Claymore.

I really hope claymore will lower its devfee overall because phoenix miner is much better overall right now and its devfee is 35% lower.

My take on the two miners

I was a Phoenix fan. Ran it for few a few months.
It is good.
Solid miner.
Hash rate was higher.
Dev fee was lower.

However since I started testing Claymore again starting with v 11.3 and now 11.4

It is good.
Solid Miner.
Hash rate the same or even higher for me than Phoenix now.
Feature rich miner, far more detailed features than Phoenix at present.
Just the setting for temp and clocking alone is far better.
Much lower stale share rate by a large factor than Phoenix.
Claymore fixing the stale share rate alone paid for my 1% dev fee they charge.

Gotta give the nod to Claymore at this time.
These are my experiences and my opinions, you're testing may be different than mine.
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
Dear @Claymore

Can you tell me is it normal that I have so different total hashrate? What is the problem? Claymore miner or my GPUs?

ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:32 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.318 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 31.565 Mh/s, GPU1 31.692 Mh/s, GPU2 31.724 Mh/s, GPU3 31.362 Mh/s, GPU4 31.246 Mh/s, GPU5 31.729 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:39 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 175.209 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.697 Mh/s, GPU1 30.633 Mh/s, GPU2 31.702 Mh/s, GPU3 27.850 Mh/s, GPU4 26.629 Mh/s, GPU5 26.699 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:45 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 187.369 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 30.963 Mh/s, GPU1 31.333 Mh/s, GPU2 31.082 Mh/s, GPU3 31.158 Mh/s, GPU4 31.410 Mh/s, GPU5 31.422 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
GPU0 t=40C fan=45%%, GPU1 t=43C fan=46%%, GPU2 t=41C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=38C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=47C fan=48%%, GPU5 t=40C fan=45%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:04 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 188.692 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.552 Mh/s, GPU1 31.717 Mh/s, GPU2 31.661 Mh/s, GPU3 31.017 Mh/s, GPU4 31.738 Mh/s, GPU5 31.006 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:16 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 173.243 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.727 Mh/s, GPU1 28.583 Mh/s, GPU2 28.311 Mh/s, GPU3 28.557 Mh/s, GPU4 28.722 Mh/s, GPU5 27.343 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:24 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 186.359 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.709 Mh/s, GPU1 31.355 Mh/s, GPU2 29.162 Mh/s, GPU3 31.366 Mh/s, GPU4 31.320 Mh/s, GPU5 31.446 Mh/s
GPU0 t=41C fan=45%%, GPU1 t=44C fan=47%%, GPU2 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=39C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=48C fan=49%%, GPU5 t=41C fan=45%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:34 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 176.728 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 27.605 Mh/s, GPU1 28.760 Mh/s, GPU2 28.791 Mh/s, GPU3 28.812 Mh/s, GPU4 31.660 Mh/s, GPU5 31.100 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:45 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 190.346 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 31.749 Mh/s, GPU1 31.683 Mh/s, GPU2 31.743 Mh/s, GPU3 31.737 Mh/s, GPU4 31.724 Mh/s, GPU5 31.710 Mh/s
GPU0 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU1 t=44C fan=47%%, GPU2 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=39C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=47C fan=49%%, GPU5 t=41C fan=46%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:36:04 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 185.858 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 28.375 Mh/s, GPU1 31.677 Mh/s, GPU2 31.268 Mh/s, GPU3 31.713 Mh/s, GPU4 31.542 Mh/s, GPU5 31.282 Mh/s
jr. member
Activity: 129
Merit: 3
Hello everyone
I wanted to know if your antivirus was not alarmed by Claymore's latest executable.
This is the first time I have this kind of detection, I got the client on Bitcointalk on the Claymore post, both Mega and Googledrive.
I sent the report on the total virus and it shows me this kind of analysis, nothing reassuring


SHA256:    c816be5af9f605605a47c689a89e628239001a84c8ef6e205990696a4ef2fdaf
Nom du fichier :    Claymore's Dual Ethereum Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal_Blake2s_Kecca...
Ratio de détection :    20 / 60
Date d'analyse :    2018-03-13 16:26:16 UTC (il y a 6 heures, 1 minute)

Virus Total


AegisLab Coinminer.Ethereum.Gen!c 20180313
Antiy-AVL RiskWare[RiskTool]/Win32.AGeneric 20180313
AVware Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20180313
CAT-QuickHeal Trojan.IGENERIC 20180313
Cylance Unsafe 20180313
Cyren ZIP/Trojan.FNCY-7 20180313
DrWeb Trojan.BtcMine.2330 20180313
ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/CoinMiner.BX potentially unwanted 20180313
Fortinet Riskware/Generic 20180313
GData Archive.Trojan.Agent.HPLYT0 20180313
Ikarus PUA.CoinMiner 20180313
Kaspersky not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win32.Generic 20180313
McAfee Artemis!3E5ABA78FC8F 20180313
NANO-Antivirus Trojan.Win32.BtcMine.eykufr 20180313
Rising PUF.CoinMiner!8.4639 (TFE:5:BmMJEOlyP8T) 20180313
Sophos AV Claymore’s Ethereum Dual Miner (PUA) 20180313
Symantec Trojan.Gen.NPE 20180313
TrendMicro Coinmin.EBF55070 20180313
TrendMicro-HouseCall Suspicious_GEN.F47V0313 20180313
ZoneAlarm by Check Point not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win32.Generic 20180313
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 556
Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!
Who did you steal that account from?
A legendary member asking the most basic of questions... Where have you been the last 5 years, "legend"?
Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
I am moving to Phoenix too, dual mining becomes unprofitable, miner is unstable, devfee is huge for Claymore.

I really hope claymore will lower its devfee overall because phoenix miner is much better overall right now and its devfee is 35% lower.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Hi all,

Not sure why miner can't connect to DCR when dual mining.


I get the message:

DCR: Stratum - cannot connect to yiimp.ccminer.org:3252
DCR: Stratum - failed to connect try in 20 second

and it keep repeating the same.

ETH is mining perfectly.

Anyone one knows the reason please let me know.

Thanks
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Idunno what's with all the whining, v11.4 runs great.

Modded RX 580 Gaming X 8G getting 30.8 Mh/s ETH & 1.175 Gh/s XVG on Win 10, beta drivers with semi-conservative Claymore settings.
Using MSA to set fans at 38% for ~51c on all cards (plus 12V fans blowing through the GPUs), 68F ambient temperature.

Could dial things up or down for more or less power/hashes but things are solid, cool, and fast enough. Will tweak things again later.
Should be able to lower wattage by 10 to 15W or bump things up and get 31.25 Mh/s ETH, 1.3 Gh/s XVG and still be stable with reasonable temps but MEH, whatever.
(ETH only = 31.25 Mh/s all day long at -mclock 2200 -dcri 8, 48c, 30% fan. -mclock 2225 will do 31.5 but was slightly unstable after 10 hours.)

-etha 0
-estale 0
-dcri 38
-cclock 1215
-cvddc 925
-mvddc 925
-mclock 2200
-tt 59
-tstop 67
-ttdcr 63
-ttli 65
-ftime 10
-minspeed -120
-fanmin 35
-fanmax 55
-gser 1
-allcoins 1
-allpools 1
-dbg -1 (no need to log perfection)


For me, like others, lots of incorrect shares on dual mining (4% for me is a lot!). Reverted to 11.1 and I have zero incorrects. Hope this will be fixed soon or I will just do solo mining, maybe giving a try to Phoenix
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Idunno what's with all the whining, v11.4 runs great.

Modded RX 580 Gaming X 8G getting 30.8 Mh/s ETH & 1.175 Gh/s XVG on Win 10, beta drivers with semi-conservative Claymore settings.
Using MSA to set fans at 38% for ~51c on all cards (plus 12V fans blowing through the GPUs), 68F ambient temperature.

Could dial things up or down for more or less power/hashes but things are solid, cool, and fast enough. Will tweak things again later.
Should be able to lower wattage by 10 to 15W or bump things up and get 31.25 Mh/s ETH, 1.3 Gh/s XVG and still be stable with reasonable temps but MEH, whatever.
(ETH only = 31.25 Mh/s all day long at -mclock 2200 -dcri 8, 48c, 30% fan. -mclock 2225 will do 31.5 but was slightly unstable after 10 hours.)

-etha 0
-estale 0
-dcri 38
-cclock 1215
-cvddc 925
-mvddc 925
-mclock 2200
-tt 59
-tstop 67
-ttdcr 63
-ttli 65
-ftime 10
-minspeed -120
-fanmin 35
-fanmax 55
-gser 1
-allcoins 1
-allpools 1
-dbg -1 (no need to log perfection)
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
I have this in .bat file

timeout /t 15
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal 0x26Ff37f6cBa786D906bB2078b52c405DaB3B519A.Miner01 -epsw x -tt 40 -fanmin 100 -fanmax 100 -etha 0 -asm 2 -allpools 1

Thank you. But nothing changes (
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Success here too, however all is not well just yet.

First, thanks for the stale shares fix on Ethermine, and the 1.5% improvement on hashrate.. We went from 4% to 1% stale shares and 5540 to 5625 MH/s (191 GPUs).

However, every hour (dev fee) there seems to be an issue where random rigs stop mining. Prior to 11.x I had roughly 10-12 days without downtime. This was still happening after upgrading to 11.4. Someone in ethOS chat mentioned that this is related to the new SSL stratum connection. After reverting to the old non-SSL port, the issue went away. So, if anyone is experiencing random mining stoppage, I would suggest you do the same.

Working great now! But, we need a reliable SSL connection. This was a great idea, and I look forward to being able to use it reliably in the future.

https://i.imgur.com/lqukTnf.png



https://medium.com/@bitfly/ethermine-stratum-security-upgrade-d2245076e1b5

use ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for example.Reliable SSL server

Can anybody help me with ethermine.org pool? I had not found the way to run Claymore with this pool.

I can see in console the following

ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <94.23.28.180> port 5555 (SSL/TLS)
No pool specified for Decred! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333

SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
Pool certificate verified successfully
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eu1.ethermine.org:5555) (SSL/TLS)
ETH: Share rejected!
GPU0 t=33C fan=41%, GPU1 t=36C fan=43%, GPU2 t=31C fan=41%, GPU3 t=30C fan=40%, GPU4 t=36C fan=43%, GPU5 t=33C fan=42%
ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
GPU0 t=31C fan=40%, GPU1 t=33C fan=42%, GPU2 t=29C fan=40%, GPU3 t=28C fan=40%, GPU4 t=34C fan=42%, GPU5 t=33C fan=41%
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <51.255.64.43> port 5555 (SSL/TLS)
SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
Pool certificate verified successfully
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eu1.ethermine.org:5555) (SSL/TLS)
ETH: Share rejected!
GPU0 t=29C fan=40%, GPU1 t=31C fan=40%, GPU2 t=28C fan=40%, GPU3 t=27C fan=40%, GPU4 t=33C fan=42%, GPU5 t=32C fan=41%
ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...





I have this in .bat file

timeout /t 15
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal 0x26Ff37f6cBa786D906bB2078b52c405DaB3B519A.Miner01 -epsw x -tt 40 -fanmin 100 -fanmax 100 -etha 0 -asm 2 -allpools 1

Use own wallet address please.
Not sure why yours is not working,i am not dual mining anymore,since it's not really cost effective for me anymore.

 
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
When can we get a Claymore NeoScrypt version for Linux?
newbie
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!

lower clock will reduce has at the same time- if you are fine with it
command line for reducing intensity - see Page 1
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!

I dual mine which generates a lot of heat. I find lowering the power limit has the biggest effect on lowering temperatures and power usage, while affecting hash rate the least. Next is undervolting the core and the least effect on lowering temperatures is adjusting the clock speed, which also affects the hash rate the most compared to adjusting the power limit and undervolting.

Otherwise you can also lower the temperature by increasing the airflow to dissipate the air around the rig. I use a box fan which is cheap and does a good job.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
so claymore is expensive and now unstable smh i guess back to phoeniex
Jump to: