Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 327. (Read 6590718 times)

newbie
Activity: 312
Merit: 0
I need a little help guys. I have one AMD card (will be adding more) to my 7 card Nidvia rig. I only want to use Claymore for the AMD card. This is my bat file, but it's still running all the cards. Can someone tell me what I need to do to tweak it?

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

-di 0

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal 0xfe943a6dabf68375754d07044812f76a0dd01d64 -epsw x

Insert -di 0 into config.txt
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Got 4% incorrect over night again even though I turned down the cards further.  This is dual mining.

Might just revert to 10.6.  The effective rate was much higher and the cards were stable at higher speeds.

So exactly like me, I'll revert back to 11.1 until this issue with dual will be sorted out
full member
Activity: 236
Merit: 101
Just switched to 11.4 from 11.0, seeing a better hashrate 138 vs 135 with 5x RX570.

Has anyone tested to see if there is much increase in power usage at the wall with the newest version?
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Got 4% incorrect over night again even though I turned down the cards further.  This is dual mining.

Might just revert to 10.6.  The effective rate was much higher and the cards were stable at higher speeds.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
any feedback for stale shares? and what about incorrect shares?

Zero incorrects for 16 hours, 1% stale shares, sometimes 2% and sometimes 0%.

Are you single mining or dual mining? I get incorrects on dual mining, like 4% in 18 hours while no incorrects in single mining...
newbie
Activity: 322
Merit: 0
I need a little help guys. I have one AMD card (will be adding more) to my 7 card Nidvia rig. I only want to use Claymore for the AMD card. This is my bat file, but it's still running all the cards. Can someone tell me what I need to do to tweak it?

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

-di 0

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal 0xfe943a6dabf68375754d07044812f76a0dd01d64 -epsw x
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Switched to Phoenix miner after being years on Claymore. Phoenix is more lightweight, produces almost same hashrate and is more stable. Stale shares went drastically down. And Claymore had a huge problem for some of my rigs, it was switching between pools like crazy, constantly droping out the connection to main pool. Phoenix fixed this.

Does Phoenix support dualmining?
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
One difference I discovered between v11.3 and 11.4: one of my cards shows temp. 58 C an the fan at 86% in claymore 11.3... in claymore 11.4 same card at temp 58 the fan is at 96%. settings in claymore TT 60 and FANMAX 85
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Before 11.2 my RX 580 Nitro+ SE (Micron) cards were absolutely stable at 2240 mhz, but 11.2+ causes reboot after 10 seconds of mining. New max frequency is 2080 Sad
Other cards (various 570 and 580) still working without issues.

Question is at what hashrate your cards were running.... My Nitro+ RX580 are running at 1175/850 core and 2200/875 mem and output per card is 31.5 mh/s. this is from claymore 11.4

Same as yours - 31.5 mh/s at 2240, now 30.1 mh/s at 2080.

Before 11.2 my RX 580 Nitro+ SE (Micron) cards were absolutely stable at 2240 mhz, but 11.2+ causes reboot after 10 seconds of mining. New max frequency is 2080 Sad
Other cards (various 570 and 580) still working without issues.

Yep, same thing here, less stable. However, you can use the new -ethi X parameter to reduce intensity. Supposedly, with 11.2 higher intensity was introduced, producing better hashrate.

Thanks, gonna investigate this issue later and try ethi too.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Switched to Phoenix miner after being years on Claymore. Phoenix is more lightweight, produces almost same hashrate and is more stable. Stale shares went drastically down. And Claymore had a huge problem for some of my rigs, it was switching between pools like crazy, constantly droping out the connection to main pool. Phoenix fixed this.
full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Success here too, however all is not well just yet.

First, thanks for the stale shares fix on Ethermine, and the 1.5% improvement on hashrate.. We went from 4% to 1% stale shares and 5540 to 5625 MH/s (191 GPUs).

However, every hour (dev fee) there seems to be an issue where random rigs stop mining. Prior to 11.x I had roughly 10-12 days without downtime. This was still happening after upgrading to 11.4. Someone in ethOS chat mentioned that this is related to the new SSL stratum connection. After reverting to the old non-SSL port, the issue went away. So, if anyone is experiencing random mining stoppage, I would suggest you do the same.

Working great now! But, we need a reliable SSL connection. This was a great idea, and I look forward to being able to use it reliably in the future.



newbie
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
Before 11.2 my RX 580 Nitro+ SE (Micron) cards were absolutely stable at 2240 mhz, but 11.2+ causes reboot after 10 seconds of mining. New max frequency is 2080 Sad
Other cards (various 570 and 580) still working without issues.

Yep, same thing here, less stable. However, you can use the new -ethi X parameter to reduce intensity. Supposedly, with 11.2 higher intensity was introduced, producing better hashrate.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
https://i.imgur.com/EL9xHtp.gif

My experience with 11.4 and Stale Shares.
Arrow marks the spot where I upgraded from 11.3 to 11.4
The image is 11.3 to left of arrow and 11.4 to the right.

I would say this is a great success in reducing stale shares from 11.3 to 11.4
Also everything else is stable, running cool and hash rates are equal to or greater than all other Claymore versions.

I would say this is a complete success.


where do you get this graph?

Ethermine mining pool.

Yes. Ethermine mining pool.


OK. I am on Nanopool.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Before 11.2 my RX 580 Nitro+ SE (Micron) cards were absolutely stable at 2240 mhz, but 11.2+ causes reboot after 10 seconds of mining. New max frequency is 2080 Sad
Other cards (various 570 and 580) still working without issues.

Question is at what hashrate your cards were running.... My Nitro+ RX580 are running at 1175/850 core and 2200/875 mem and output per card is 31.5 mh/s. this is from claymore 11.4
jr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
I love version 11.4, but it's annoying that Windows Defender sees it as a virus.  Just annoying, not a dealbreaker.
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6


My experience with 11.4 and Stale Shares.
Arrow marks the spot where I upgraded from 11.3 to 11.4
The image is 11.3 to left of arrow and 11.4 to the right.

I would say this is a great success in reducing stale shares from 11.3 to 11.4
Also everything else is stable, running cool and hash rates are equal to or greater than all other Claymore versions.

I would say this is a complete success.


where do you get this graph?

Ethermine mining pool.

Yes. Ethermine mining pool.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Merit me or don't.


My experience with 11.4 and Stale Shares.
Arrow marks the spot where I upgraded from 11.3 to 11.4
The image is 11.3 to left of arrow and 11.4 to the right.

I would say this is a great success in reducing stale shares from 11.3 to 11.4
Also everything else is stable, running cool and hash rates are equal to or greater than all other Claymore versions.

I would say this is a complete success.


where do you get this graph?

Ethermine mining pool.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
https://i.imgur.com/EL9xHtp.gif

My experience with 11.4 and Stale Shares.
Arrow marks the spot where I upgraded from 11.3 to 11.4
The image is 11.3 to left of arrow and 11.4 to the right.

I would say this is a great success in reducing stale shares from 11.3 to 11.4
Also everything else is stable, running cool and hash rates are equal to or greater than all other Claymore versions.

I would say this is a complete success.


where do you get this graph?
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
I cannot see any. Others apparently do...
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6


My experience with 11.4 and Stale Shares.
Arrow marks the spot where I upgraded from 11.3 to 11.4
The image is 11.3 to left of arrow and 11.4 to the right.

I would say this is a great success in reducing stale shares from 11.3 to 11.4
Also everything else is stable, running cool and hash rates are equal to or greater than all other Claymore versions.

I would say this is a complete success.
Jump to: