Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 245.

zzzzzzzzzz

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mitja1998 on January 09, 2017, 07:13:43 PM

I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?

Optiminer specifically says that R9 Nano/Fury and RX GPUs perform best, at this point, with linux on his v1.3.

zzzzzzzzzz

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: jstefanop on January 09, 2017, 06:50:57 PM

Quote from: IOTUSA on January 09, 2017, 06:32:31 PM

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

Really? I have 20 6-GPU (Nano) rigs and a couple smaller ones running optiminer v1.3 on linux. I have no dropped connection problems, very, very low stale share rate, and I'm getting 400+ sols/sec per GPU. Not every issue we have as miners is the fault of the mining software itself.

sorry2xs

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node

Quote from: mafaz on January 09, 2017, 09:13:36 PM

Quote from: ivomm on January 09, 2017, 11:48:52 AM

Quote from: markus124 on January 09, 2017, 11:22:28 AM

Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?

I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming.
Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room Roll Eyes

. Excellent solution for heating the appartment Grin

. But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling the heat outside. Huh

how do you fight dry air if its + 25 inside? I was thinking to use these for heating.... but it would be just too dry inside.

buckets of water strategically placed with a fan blowing air across the top of the water Cheesy

mafaz

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

Quote from: ivomm on January 09, 2017, 11:48:52 AM

Quote from: markus124 on January 09, 2017, 11:22:28 AM

Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?

I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming.
Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room Roll Eyes

. Excellent solution for heating the appartment Grin

. But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling the heat outside. Huh

how do you fight dry air if its + 25 inside? I was thinking to use these for heating.... but it would be just too dry inside.

Jjohnwick

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Sapphire rx 480 8gb nitro +
Claymore zcash v10. i get 290sol (bios mod. gpu clock 1352 memoryclock 2100 110volt.) -i 8 -a 2
http://i.hizliresim.com/PnayX5.png

Mitja1998

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?

Eliovp

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1293

Huh?

Quote from: jstefanop on January 09, 2017, 06:50:57 PM

Quote from: IOTUSA on January 09, 2017, 06:32:31 PM

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

True, it's not that stable as Claymore's, but everything is easy to solve isn't it?

Manual restart Grin

crash=$(watch tail -n 100 ../optiminer-zec/log.log | grep "Share")
if ($crash -ge "0");then
kill -9 $(pgrep optiminer)
sleep 5
./optiminer-zec/start.sh
fi

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2162

Merit: 1401

Quote from: IOTUSA on January 09, 2017, 06:32:31 PM

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

IOTUSA

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

ykzaneo

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

I have a problem my Miner indicates that I am generating 440H / s but the pool says that only 300H / s and it happens to me with Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v10.0 instead with version 9.3 it indicates 420H / s and the pool says 420 H / s , it's wrong ?

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Optiminer ahead

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

CLAYMORE you better add speed , and that your miner becomes interesting. I your miner always considered the best , but at the moment alas it is not

786sam

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

Quote from: Claymore on January 09, 2017, 05:06:42 PM

I'm still working on new version, already got good improvements but still a lot of work is required. I plan to release an update in 1-2 days.

Great work bro. Take your time and lets make sure these other miners take longer to catch up this time Grin

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

6*390=2160-2190 salt optiminer .
CLAYMORE loses in speed and remains behind

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

I'm still working on new version, already got good improvements but still a lot of work is required. I plan to release an update in 1-2 days.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: malandante on January 09, 2017, 12:15:15 PM

I had a similar issue with a 280x toxic, clocked at 1150/1600. I tried lowering clocks, raising voltage but the card was running wild to up to 320 h/s and a lot of rejects and errors. Lowering intensity to 4 solved it. For some reason, cards even within the same chipset behave differently.

One of my pair of R9 280x (both are the SAME model of Gigabyte Windforce card) gets very wierd unstable and unhappy at anything over -i 4 but runs reliably at that intensity.
The other one will run at anything up to -i 8 but seems to give the highest reliable hashrate results at -i 6.

My RX 470s were happy at -i 8 on v9.1 but got very crashy on v9.2 at same settings, dropped them to -i 7 and they're a lot happier - then moved them to v10 and they're still happiest at -i 7.
(definitely not an inadaquate PS - that machine is running on a Seasonic X-1250)

smaxz

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 253

VeganAcademy

Quote from: jddebug on January 08, 2017, 06:18:16 PM

Anyone using 7970's. What are you finding for the best Algorithm? What hashrate are you seeing?

I'm getting about 890H/s with 4 7970's using a2 i8. With a single 7090 I get 223H/s with a2 i8.

Thanks

i am getting 175 with -a 1 -i 4 clocked 1000,1500. nofee 1.

its an old undervolted XFX left over from my scrypt mining days though and really on its last leg performance wise so not sure how much of an benchmark it should be considered as.

i think i'll be switching back to optminer soon for this card as when initiall tested it reported a bit under what claymore 10 shows.. but the average seemed to be creeping up on my pool stats for this mining instance.

Ursul0

sr. member

Activity: 857

Merit: 262

Quote from: dragonchopper9 on January 09, 2017, 10:14:13 AM

Quote from: batko on January 09, 2017, 07:50:34 AM

Quote from: Claymore on January 07, 2017, 04:36:01 PM

v10.0:

- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.

PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.

[/b]

Today new version Cheesy

I do not understand why increase the speed yet?

because of optiminer improvements

Redcard

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 09, 2017, 02:54:24 PM

Hello! Tell today will be a new release? The normal increase in speed ?

Will you ever stop asking for speed? And when you get more speed you'll get rich or what? The zec price is still LOW!

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Hello! Tell today will be a new release? The normal increase in speed ?

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 245. (Read 3839163 times)