Does anyone know if you can set gpu/memory clock directly from the miner in linux with amdgpu-pro ? What about undervolt in Linux ?
And why do my rx 480 rigs reset themselves in linux after a few minutes of mining, but the rx 470 work fine ? very strange.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 246. (Read 3839204 times)
Pair of Sapphire ref-style RX 470, no bios mod
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
What memory do you have on your gpus?
Both the R9 280x and RX 470 cards I have are Hynix ram
I Get this on one o my RX480 cards it displays @ over 600h/s with lots of rejects I've tried intensity 4 with no luck.
It was fine up until v9.1 I think.
Since then I've not been able to mine for zec incase I damage my card.
It was fine up until v9.1 I think.
Since then I've not been able to mine for zec incase I damage my card.
what is wrong with my 280X?
seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
What miner do you use?seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
omg, I cry. I don't believe what I'm reading here...
Yeah no idea how you get 290H/s. I am guessing your timings might be modded and its incorrectly displaying the hashrate. I had this happen before with ETH mining.
For Tahiti, the most I can get is 245H/s and that's with a high end 7970 which is maxed out at 1100/1575 with memory straps hacked. The other 280x are all at 230h/s, which is still higher than my RX 470s.
its stock rom, 1100 core 1500 mem
it started at about 230 h/s after mining for the dev fee it started to climb to 290 h/s
there is a problem because the rejects are pretty high.
as of now running time is 16:57, total shares 2054, rejects 242 ...i suppose it is still getting shares like a 230 h/s...and looking at dwafpool it is not far behind my 2x rx 480 rig in shares..
I had a similar issue with a 280x toxic, clocked at 1150/1600. I tried lowering clocks, raising voltage but the card was running wild to up to 320 h/s and a lot of rejects and errors. Lowering intensity to 4 solved it. For some reason, cards even within the same chipset behave differently.
Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?
I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming.Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room
. Excellent solution for heating the appartment 
. But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling the heat outside. 
Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?
I'm looking to pickup an RX 480 card and there is about a $100 difference between models, can anyone tell me if this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
A reference card is made by the the chip manufacturer (AMD or Nvidia), and has the 'standard' PCB/cooler for a given GPU. Their partners (SAPPHIRE,MSI,EVGA,etc.) can make cards based on that reference model or make their own custom PCBs and/or coolers to go with a given GPU. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
Reference cards tend to have blower-style coolers, while partner coolers are often open air-style, for whatever reason.Non-reference graphics cards have better cooling and better performance.Do not worry about the English. Not all users of the English-speaking world. Only they can perfectly know speak english. Sometimes neither they, because only God is perfect
. 
GPU hangs in opencl error
Is it possible that it is a RAMs fault ?
4gb RAM 6xRX480s
v9.2 works great
Is it possible that it is a RAMs fault ?
4gb RAM 6xRX480s
v9.2 works great
I'm looking to pickup an RX 480 card and there is about a $100 difference between models, can anyone tell me if this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
Yes, they are great cards for the price, and very good for mining
Ok thanks for the quick reply! I just didn't want to buy one and then 5 minutes later someone goes, well if you only spent $10 you could have got XXX... :p
I'm looking to pickup an RX 480 card and there is about a $100 difference between models, can anyone tell me if this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
Yes, they are great cards for the price, and very good for mining
I'm looking to pickup an RX 480 card and there is about a $100 difference between models, can anyone tell me if this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150774&Tpk=N82E16814150774
will work, of if there is a better bang for the buck? The XFX Radeon is almost $40 more here. I noticed some threads discussing reference boards, but I don't understand the meaning.
Sorry if my english is not great. thanks in advance.
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
[/b]- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
Today new version
I do not understand why increase the speed yet?
Pair of Sapphire ref-style RX 470, no bios mod
1250/1750/-75mv
-i 7
Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
1100/1500 no bios mod
211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.
1250/1750/-75mv
-i 7
Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
1100/1500 no bios mod
211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.
What memory do you have on your gpus?
from last 30 hours DWARFPOOL is doing great
I noticed an ad on Coinotron:
ZCash: 0% True PPS mining. Just change worker type to PPS !!!!
( until 2017-01-15 or pool's hashrate > 3 MH/s )
Though right now this pool has only 76 miners and miserably low hashrate.
In past it had been a very good pool for me with other algos.
ZCash: 0% True PPS mining. Just change worker type to PPS !!!!
( until 2017-01-15 or pool's hashrate > 3 MH/s )
Though right now this pool has only 76 miners and miserably low hashrate.
In past it had been a very good pool for me with other algos.
they were too slow to add... got left behind.
v10.0:
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
[/b]- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.
PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.
Today new version
Already began to reflect the replacement of the card at NVIDIA, took for the experiment were collected one rig 6*1070=2620-2700 sol give me Claymore v 10 really disappointed me. 390 I think AMD will not catch up with NVIDIA
Do keep in mind that the 1070 is ballpark $400 card, while the RX 470 are sub-$200 and many RX 480 are also sub-$200 though the average for the 480 seems to be closer to $220.
Why is it a shock that a high-end high cost card can outperform a "mainstream" much lower cost card?
The REAL comparison should be to the NVidia card in the same price range, the GTX 1060.
what is wrong with my 280X?
seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
What miner do you use?seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
omg, I cry. I don't believe what I'm reading here...
Yeah no idea how you get 290H/s. I am guessing your timings might be modded and its incorrectly displaying the hashrate. I had this happen before with ETH mining.
For Tahiti, the most I can get is 245H/s and that's with a high end 7970 which is maxed out at 1100/1575 with memory straps hacked. The other 280x are all at 230h/s, which is still higher than my RX 470s.
its stock rom, 1100 core 1500 mem
it started at about 230 h/s after mining for the dev fee it started to climb to 290 h/s
there is a problem because the rejects are pretty high.
as of now running time is 16:57, total shares 2054, rejects 242 ...i suppose it is still getting shares like a 230 h/s...and looking at dwafpool it is not far behind my 2x rx 480 rig in shares..
what is wrong with my 280X?
seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
What miner do you use?seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!
omg, I cry. I don't believe what I'm reading here...
Yeah no idea how you get 290H/s. I am guessing your timings might be modded and its incorrectly displaying the hashrate. I had this happen before with ETH mining.
For Tahiti, the most I can get is 245H/s and that's with a high end 7970 which is maxed out at 1100/1575 with memory straps hacked. The other 280x are all at 230h/s, which is still higher than my RX 470s.
Pair of Sapphire ref-style RX 470, no bios mod
1250/1750/-75mv
-i 7
Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
1100/1500 no bios mod
211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.
1250/1750/-75mv
-i 7
Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10
Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)
1100/1500 no bios mod
211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.
Also I notice that RX470 rate has rised by 10%
Jump to: