Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 293. (Read 3839163 times)

member
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
FINALLY a LINUX build!!!!!  Thank you Claymore!  Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!  

I have it up and running on a Linux rig now and a very nice improvement over my Silent Army miner.  The was so sorely needed.  ZEC mining was a weak spot because I couldn't get the hash rates out of my Linux rigs.  This is wonderful news.  So far it looks good!

UPDATE: I may have spoke too soon... Just got a watchdog and having to reboot a miner...

Make sure you use stock clocks for first tests.
Currently I can only confirm issue with gpu-pro drivers that causes a lot of messages to syslog (and therefore high CPU load on multi-GPU systems), I'm working on it.

Yeah! I thought I was the only one getting these.  If you disable rsyslog, and you disable printk from writing to your console screens, then CPU usage will not impact mining speed anymore.

Here are the steps I took to allow me to use this miner

# check your current printk settings.  
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk

# set CUR printk to 0 (emergency) or 1 (alert) to suppress (crit/err/warn/info)
$ sudo dmesg -n 1

# you can make these changes permanent via sysctl
$ sudo echo 'kernel.printk = "1 4 1 7"' >> /etc/sysctl.conf

# you can set them in real-time with
$ sudo sysctl -w kernel.printk="1 4 1 7"

# prevent it from filling up your syslog
$ sudo service rsyslog stop

Or just disable syslog output in /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf

# comment or change your log types
# *.*;auth,authpriv.none          -/var/log/syslog

# then restart rsyslog if you comment out the above
$ sudo service rsyslog restart
legendary
Activity: 977
Merit: 1011
I had a setback installing Ubuntu in dual boot with Windows. Ended up with a crashed system last night due to some unexpected trouble so I went back to windows and will give it another attempt later on...

Anyway, does anyone know what the performance is of a HD7950 with Claymore with Ubuntu?
On hd7950 getting ~180 H/s ( stock settings)
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
How much is obtained on 470 with modded bios?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
v9.2:

- improved speed for some cards up to 7% (depends on card model). About 330H/s on stock 390X, 235H/s on stock RX480, 300H/x on stock Nano.
- several bug fixes and minor improvements.

Thanks. I'm getting about 245H/s ~ on Msi Rx480 4Gb with modded bios.


Can you please share the modded Bios for Msi Rx480 4Gb?
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
I had a setback installing Ubuntu in dual boot with Windows. Ended up with a crashed system last night due to some unexpected trouble so I went back to windows and will give it another attempt later on...

Anyway, does anyone know what the performance is of a HD7950 with Claymore with Ubuntu?
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
FINALLY a LINUX build!!!!!  Thank you Claymore!  Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!  

I have it up and running on a Linux rig now and a very nice improvement over my Silent Army miner.  The was so sorely needed.  ZEC mining was a weak spot because I couldn't get the hash rates out of my Linux rigs.  This is wonderful news.  So far it looks good!

UPDATE: I may have spoke too soon... Just got a watchdog and having to reboot a miner...

Make sure you use stock clocks for first tests.
Currently I can only confirm issue with gpu-pro drivers that causes a lot of messages to syslog (and therefore high CPU load on multi-GPU systems), I'm working on it.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 1
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks

In my case  it is very stable, I have no problem with v9.2. Maybe you should check the PS-u.
I have not change the psu, is a EVGA 850 with 3 RX-480 is ok. Now i will try to reduce intensity to 4 to see what happens. Thanks
Uhmm, 850w it should be more than acceptable for 3 RX-480 ( I'm running 6 R9 380 cards on 1250 W PSU).
 What version of driver do you use?
i have w-10, driver 16.5, Asrock H97 and unpowered risers.   
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
FINALLY a LINUX build!!!!!  Thank you Claymore!  Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!  

I have it up and running on a Linux rig now and a very nice improvement over my Silent Army miner.  The was so sorely needed.  ZEC mining was a weak spot because I couldn't get the hash rates out of my Linux rigs.  This is wonderful news.  So far it looks good!

UPDATE: I may have spoke too soon... Just got a watchdog and having to reboot a miner...
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
Hi guys, help to understand the Claymore's Remote manager.
Adding a miner I need to fill 2 fields
1) Target ZCash hashrate (MH/s)
2) Target - hashrate (MH/s)
What is the difference?
I have 6*RX480, total approx. 1450H/s=1.45Mh/s
I've discovered that it is not colored if I set
1) 1.4 or 1.45
2) 0
Thanks.
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks


I have one r9 270 and three r9 280x cards with 1000W PSU. PSU is on the limit.
before this miner, it was working fine. but with this version, with the optimisations, the power draw increased so I had crashes. Now I downclocked soma of the cards and it runs fine. I know I need bigger PSU but I do not want to spend on that now. So, downclock and lose some hashrate is ok for me.
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 500
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks

In my case  it is very stable, I have no problem with v9.2. Maybe you should check the PS-u.
I have not change the psu, is a EVGA 850 with 3 RX-480 is ok. Now i will try to reduce intensity to 4 to see what happens. Thanks
Uhmm, 850w it should be more than acceptable for 3 RX-480 ( I'm running 6 R9 380 cards on 1250 W PSU).
 What version of driver do you use?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 1
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks

In my case  it is very stable, I have no problem with v9.2. Maybe you should check the PS-u.
I have not change the psu, is a EVGA 850 with 3 RX-480 is ok. Now i will try to reduce intensity to 4 to see what happens. Thanks
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 500
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks

In my case  it is very stable, I have no problem with v9.2. Maybe you should check the PS-u.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 1
I think that this new version is not so stable than the others. I have some rigs falling after hours of working.
I do not know why the miner falls., I did not make any changes, only the version.
Thanks
full member
Activity: 199
Merit: 100
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v9.2 Beta - LINUX
max Support GPU ?

32
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v9.2 Beta - LINUX
max Support GPU ?
sr. member
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
BD People Are Legend
I think, that Claymore can stop develop new version of miner. This h|s is ok. Yeap?

If he still getting developer fee then he should still develop more

To use analogy - if you are going to cinema to see your favorite movie second or third time, do you expect to see new version of it each time?

It is not pay version:
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 2% if you use secure SSL/TLS connection to mining pool, every hour the miner mines for 72 seconds for developer.
so You not pay for using claymore, it is not a ticket for a cinema service. But it have developer fee, so you spend some % of profit to see some development. I expect that miner will be developed futher
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Quote from: tide881155 on December 22, 2016, 10:32:25 PM
I have just 225 s/h on my ref rx 480 8gb. I am using eliovp rom... Energylowok. Plz who can help to link rom atleast ~245 s/h? I have two kids, i do not have any time for experimenting with timing with my 34 rx 480:(


Look here or ask here https://forum.z.cash/t/anoraks-vbios-collection-optimized-settings-for-performance-power-saving/8347 for zec Mining modded bios .

you can get some real good help here with no Issues.  id offer some help but my bios is custom, i did it my self for a power color red dragon 480 4gb and don't like offer to do it for anyone for  reason beyond my control that card was a bitch to get just right .
I even bricked it a few times trying different bios setting.


RX 480 8G doing 265-270 sol , stock miner settings, 1165 core, 2000 mem
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.

Ubuntu 14.04

nice job Claymore


Greetings

How did u get this hashes on 480???265-270! omg... did u use reference one?

me to considering the drivers Claymore says use don't support 480 ? . if he using mixed cards thats got to be hard and take lot of time to set up right.

I'll stay with windows because end the end they all about the same .
With Linux you'll need Tahiti, R9 280 or better cards, for easier setup with the RX series, weird though that they choose to leave the 78xx/ 79xx of Tahiti's out though.

SO the drivers work with the R9 280 non X version that work with the RX 400 series now ?. and your right it depends on what card you are trying to use . Smiley.

I haven't tired  the new amdgpupro drivers yet or looked at what they support with 16.5 some thing or some thing like that.

I'll check .

thanks top .

thank you a lot.
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Claymore, you should have a good holiday. Do not work too hard.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
Dec 23 18:31:40 rig zecminer64[2097]: ZEC: Share accepted (2 ms)!
Dec 23 18:31:41 rig zecminer64[2097]: server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
Dec 23 18:31:51 rig zecminer64[2097]: server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
On linux. Any idea what is 98 error?

It's related to "-mport" option for remote management, use "-mport 0" or change port number.

Anyone getting this error ?
str error 10

Copy all files, some miner file is missed.
Jump to: