Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 332. (Read 3839163 times)
Dwarfpool for me too...best pool
Dwarfpool is based on luck. You can have +10% , +20% or +30% and more but you can have too -10% , -20% . If you are lucky stay at dwarf if not - try suprnova i think is second place to mining.
I mining on dwarf its so OP - for my first 12 hours i make + 30% and now will never leave this pool its OP for me
I mining on dwarf its so OP - for my first 12 hours i make + 30% and now will never leave this pool its OP for me
So what do you guys thinks which is best pool now for zec
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
4. Miningpoolhub
Last 24h,
1300 Sol/s =0.17285076 ZEC
guys any advice would be much appreciated about PSU.
I use Zalman 700w 80+ (http://www.zalman.com/contents/products/view.html?no=96)
for RX480 8G, some of them are modded on 230h/s some of them are not 185h/s
They randomly freeze from time to time, I suspect it's PSU problem, I just need someone to confirm this thanks
I use Zalman 700w 80+ (http://www.zalman.com/contents/products/view.html?no=96)
for RX480 8G, some of them are modded on 230h/s some of them are not 185h/s
They randomly freeze from time to time, I suspect it's PSU problem, I just need someone to confirm this thanks
Too easy
: Just try another one. Then you will know. 
newbie question
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
You can buy hashingpower from nicehash with btc and point that to dwarfpool if that is what you meant? Remember to use high diff port.
XMR is now more profitable than ZEC or ETH 
Sorry to be off-topic but what miner is the best for XMR and how does it compare power-draw wise to ETH/ZEC mining? (AMD cards)
claymore has his own miner here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-cryptonote-amd-gpu-miner-v113-638915
bro which pool is best for XMR?
like now dwarf is best for ZEC
I use dwarfpool for XMR as well as ZEC. paying out what I expect to get for my hashrate, in fact at times I seem to get a little more hashrate reported than I expected
XMR is now more profitable than ZEC or ETH
Sorry to be off-topic but what miner is the best for XMR and how does it compare power-draw wise to ETH/ZEC mining? (AMD cards)
claymore has his own miner here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-cryptonote-amd-gpu-miner-v113-638915
bro which pool is best for XMR?
like now dwarf is best for ZEC
newbie question
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
You can use the Claymore miner to mine at the Nicehash.
You can use the Claymore miner to mine at the Dwarfpool.
So what do you guys thinks which is best pool now for zec
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
Dwarfpool
newbie question
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
not as far as I know. you mine at nicehash with nicehashs pools
So what do you guys thinks which is best pool now for zec
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
I belive that 3. But it could depend on your hashrate, best - check it for self
newbie question
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
can I set Nicehash to mine with Claymore from dwarfpool?
have just a newbie question:
does it means that it appears most likely on the 3333 dwarf port where the pool auto changes the vardiff? or is this something else?
auto vardiff port = more rejects (bcs. of the reason explained before) ??
static vardiff port = lower rejects ??
True or false? (or i just mixed up apples with bananas?)
thx for any advice/explanation in forward...
does it means that it appears most likely on the 3333 dwarf port where the pool auto changes the vardiff? or is this something else?
auto vardiff port = more rejects (bcs. of the reason explained before) ??
static vardiff port = lower rejects ??
True or false? (or i just mixed up apples with bananas?)
thx for any advice/explanation in forward...
Yes 3333 is port where poll will set your diff according to your hashrate,
It is not more rejects on vardif port, it changing difficulty when is new job
btw if you change difficulty 4x then it means you could find statisticly 1 shares not 4, so sometimes you not find last share, but with lower diff you could find 2 or 3 .... But if you find then it have value of 4, not 2 or 3 ... If you set diff too low then miner and pool will spend time on sending shares, not finding them.,..
So what do you guys thinks which is best pool now for zec
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
1. Flypool
2. Nanopool
3. dwarfpool
4. Other (please name it)
FYI, admin of Dwarfpool fixed something a few hours ago related to Claymore's miner rejects issues, so it should be much less rejects on v9.1 - it means even more profit in theory as result.
If server changed diff but did not sent new job after that, miner will use old diff until new job is received. It is by stratum specs: https://github.com/str4d/zips/blob/77-zip-stratum/drafts/str4d-stratum/draft1.rst
It can be the reason, but it's a problem of the pool.
have just a newbie question:
does it means that it appears most likely on the 3333 dwarf port where the pool auto changes the vardiff? or is this something else?
auto vardiff port = more rejects (bcs. of the reason explained before) ??
static vardiff port = lower rejects ??
True or false? (or i just mixed up apples with bananas?)
thx for any advice/explanation in forward...
Hey guys, wondering what you guys were getting on Claymore 9.1 with the following cards...
RX 480 at 1333/2100mhz I'm doing 230 sol/s
But I was wondering about the following cards.
I guess what I'm asking is, what is the best price/performance of the current AMD cards? The main issue is I'm not seeing any consistency in the numbers, so it's hard to really calculate price/performance when people's numbers are all over the place.
RX 480 at 1333/2100mhz I'm doing 230 sol/s
But I was wondering about the following cards.
I guess what I'm asking is, what is the best price/performance of the current AMD cards? The main issue is I'm not seeing any consistency in the numbers, so it's hard to really calculate price/performance when people's numbers are all over the place.
same setup 2xsapphire rx480 8gb OC- 230 sols/s-from each - about 310w from wall
Dwarf is by far the best I've come across like I said before I was ruff at first but now it's on the up and up. The more hash we get the better it should be. I never had time yesterday to post my results. I'll make it a point today to show you all the gains I'm seeing on dwarf vs the others
BR
BR
guys any advice would be much appreciated about PSU.
I use Zalman 700w 80+ (http://www.zalman.com/contents/products/view.html?no=96)
for RX480 8G, some of them are modded on 230h/s some of them are not 185h/s
They randomly freeze from time to time, I suspect it's PSU problem, I just need someone to confirm this thanks
I use Zalman 700w 80+ (http://www.zalman.com/contents/products/view.html?no=96)
for RX480 8G, some of them are modded on 230h/s some of them are not 185h/s
They randomly freeze from time to time, I suspect it's PSU problem, I just need someone to confirm this thanks
FYI, admin of Dwarfpool fixed something a few hours ago related to Claymore's miner rejects issues, so it should be much less rejects on v9.1 - it means even more profit in theory as result.
If server changed diff but did not sent new job after that, miner will use old diff until new job is received. It is by stratum specs: https://github.com/str4d/zips/blob/77-zip-stratum/drafts/str4d-stratum/draft1.rst
It can be the reason, but it's a problem of the pool.
FYI, admin of Dwarfpool fixed something a few hours ago related to Claymore's miner rejects issues, so it should be much less rejects on v9.1 - it means even more profit in theory as result.
Jump to: