can some on explain, if this bot worked to acquire more btc, why would you need to even bother selling it...?
Hi Jubalix
,
It's not really "if" the bot works, the math behind the bot is solid and EMA is a well known algorithm. We have based the bots logic behind "Gomboo's Thread" which is one of the most respected trading discussions of EMA as applied to Bitcoin anywhere by one of the most respected members of the Bitcoin community. The thread has a complete explanation of the math behind the bot and why it is profitable over time.
Please take a look here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/goomboos-journal-60501As to why we sell it: We are a service provider. Why does ASICMINER sell shares when they are clearly profitable on their own? To raise capital for continued development. We use our own product, one which we continually upgrade and work on. Like ASICMINER, we would make money by trading on our own but providing the B-Bot service allows as to develop the bot beyond what we otherwise could for our benefit and the benefit of all the members of our community.
Please let me know if I may be of service in the meantime
.
Pablo.
Thank you for such a polite answer
I think the maths/logic however may disprove EMA or any other method for several reasons
[1] Essentially any system is trying to time travel to the future and convey that in formation to the present.
[2] If any system did work then everyone would be forced to adopt that system. Not every one can profit over time as all trades balance out to a zero sum of losses and profits as every seller requires a buyer thus the as every one switched to that system, it would cancel out its winning effect
[3] the compounding effect of even small repeatable wining strategy e.g. even 0.5% or 0.05% a day would soon have you owning the whole market. This has not happened in any market...
I accept maybe everyone is not using EMA so this may not have kicked in yet for [2]
Hi again Jubalix
,
Let me take your points one at a time:
1. There is a misunderstanding here, EMA does not attempt to travel into the future and apply the information to the present. Rather, it takes historical data, processes it through its algorithm and applies this information to attempt to identify a trend in the present. I am not aware of any system that attempts to time travel into the future and convey the data into the present, because that is, well, impossible. Best case, you can take present data and attempt to make an estimation of the future. To repeat though, EMA takes historical data and processes it to try to identify trends in the immediate present, which strikes me as perfectly reasonable.
2. I agree that this wouldn't apply as not everyone is using EMA, but also, when you consider the day trading bots large banks and clearinghouses use, you realize that it's not a matter of how many people adopt it but rather a matter of how much of the market these people can move, even with a perfect (theoretical) system. Bitcoin is a billion dollar market, I don't think we could put together enough players within any system to effect the market, even assuming a theoretical, perfect system which does not exist. When you realize that the market is very large to move and that no system is perfect (effective systems tend to be profitable, not infallible), it becomes clear this is a moot point.
3. This isn't true for the same reasons discussed in point 2. Furthermore, you seem to be discounting all trading systems, not just EMA. It is a point of fact that there are effective trading systems (again, effective does not mean infallible which you seem to assume), even a cursory review of Gomboo's thread, which I believe I linked before, would reveal to you a whole host of effective trading systems. Commercial banks and clearing houses have devoted their existences to trading systems. Yes, there have been big issues with these, but overall most of the systems used have been profitable when measured over time, otherwise this institutions would not exist, furthermore, traders would not exist as the whole market would be a large casino.
Please let me know if I may be of service in any other way
.
Pablo.