yes but i was not a legendary so i havent asked
but
some of hero members got it.
i wonder what decides about this.
philipma should get free unit for his reviews too.
Topic: [Closed] Legendaries review party of Spondoolies-Tech's SP20 - page 3. (Read 19124 times)
December 21, 2014, 01:38:31 PM
December 21, 2014, 01:34:55 PM
what kind of hero member deserves free miner ?
i have reviewed few hashing units at this forum for free
and much more at polish forums and youtube
Thanks
i have reviewed few hashing units at this forum for free
and much more at polish forums and youtube
Thanks
We both missed the boat SDT made a post asking for reviewers a while back, It got filled fast
December 21, 2014, 01:18:11 PM
what kind of hero member deserves free miner ?
i have reviewed few hashing units at this forum for free
and much more at polish forums and youtube
Thanks
i have reviewed few hashing units at this forum for free
and much more at polish forums and youtube
Thanks
December 20, 2014, 05:14:15 PM
Thanks for the review unit! I have added my review here.
You have interesting Ethernet cables
December 20, 2014, 12:09:23 PM
Thanks for the review unit! I have added my review here.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-hi-res-board-pics-unofficial-support-900307
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-hi-res-board-pics-unofficial-support-900307
December 20, 2014, 11:45:07 AM
I enjoyed all the threads...seeing different points of views by people. Once a thread reaches 400 posts it almost becomes useless. Who will read through 300+ posts?
I learned 3 or 4 things from the legends reviews. They improved my mining setup. But the sp20's now have
my unofficial thread 1)
the legends party thread 2)
and 12 or 13 review threads total = 16 threads give or take one.
Now frankly this may be the best home miner ever built for a USA 15 amp 120 volt circuit.
I can run 2 per circuit safely and get more then 2300gh a circuit.
So It does deserve a lot of information.
Has to be a way to make it good and not have us fighting over it.
December 20, 2014, 11:28:35 AM
I enjoyed all the threads...seeing different points of views by people. Once a thread reaches 400 posts it almost becomes useless. Who will read through 300+ posts?
December 20, 2014, 09:45:34 AM
I understand but these should really have all been collated here as it ends up being advertising for spondoolies on the forum that costs spondoolies but did not actually pay the forum. Unfortunately there is no merge function in this forum software which would be the ideal solution. Out of respect for the legendaries I've forgone the locking for now, but can I urge the reviewers themselves to lock their threads and refer back to this one once they have completed whatever they have to say instead then?
These reviews were planned more than a week ago, all out in the open. If you didn't want separate threads, etc. why didn't you say something before they were all posted?
December 20, 2014, 09:30:44 AM
December 20, 2014, 09:13:44 AM
There are quite a number of these reviews now cluttering up the hardware area and while it was nice publicity for spondoolies, I will be locking each thread after they have been up for a couple of days and I suggest further discussion regarding the reviews should go here. @spondoolies-tech, you may wish to create links to all the original review threads in your top post.
Thank you for this conman. I was a little surprised it was allowed in the first place as it does set a pretty terrible precedence (hardware forum font page is basically for sale...), but I think your reasoning above and your solution is fair.
If people want this type of spammy shit in a new sub, go to meta and ask/fight for it.
don't be such an arse licker Flying Hellfish.
the sheer volume of rotation of threads on these forums is reason enough for me put you on ignore for pointless comment of the year award.
Thank you for that, it's like a badge of honour for me. I humbly and personally apologize for having a different opinion than you and for having the shear ignorant audacity to share it in a public forum.
Now get back to calling people names it makes your arguments significantly stronger.
you have come onto a Spondoolies thread to complain about the fact that you have viewed far too many Spondoolies threads on the forum? right?
oh the irony.
Huh, guess your ignore button didn't work?
Mate this isn't about SPT specifically, personally I am following this issue as I believe it has wider implications (sorry to burst your bubble). As I mentioned in my first response allowing one company to buy the front page (for all intents and purposes) of the hardware sub (without paying the forum) sets a terrible precedence. I can see a lot of other manufactures doing exactly the same thing (or worse heaven forbid). The hardware section becomes the manufacture's advertising section instantly and any tiny scrap of information that does get here is even more difficult to find. I personally thought the way conman plans on handling it was reasonable. He can now put manufacture's on notice that this shit won't fly in the future but allowing SPT and the legendaries to finish out what they started.
Go back to meta and work on getting your manufacture child boards and do all this shit till your hearts content. I don't think it belongs here, that is my opinion and like it or not, agree with it or not I am free to share it thank you very much.
December 20, 2014, 08:54:48 AM
There are quite a number of these reviews now cluttering up the hardware area and while it was nice publicity for spondoolies, I will be locking each thread after they have been up for a couple of days and I suggest further discussion regarding the reviews should go here. @spondoolies-tech, you may wish to create links to all the original review threads in your top post.
Thank you for this conman. I was a little surprised it was allowed in the first place as it does set a pretty terrible precedence (hardware forum font page is basically for sale...), but I think your reasoning above and your solution is fair.
If people want this type of spammy shit in a new sub, go to meta and ask/fight for it.
don't be such an arse licker Flying Hellfish.
the sheer volume of rotation of threads on these forums is reason enough for me put you on ignore for pointless comment of the year award.
Thank you for that, it's like a badge of honour for me. I humbly and personally apologize for having a different opinion than you and for having the shear ignorant audacity to share it in a public forum.
Now get back to calling people names it makes your arguments significantly stronger.
you have come onto a Spondoolies thread to complain about the fact that you have viewed far too many Spondoolies threads on the forum? right?
oh the irony.
December 20, 2014, 08:48:38 AM
There are quite a number of these reviews now cluttering up the hardware area and while it was nice publicity for spondoolies, I will be locking each thread after they have been up for a couple of days and I suggest further discussion regarding the reviews should go here. @spondoolies-tech, you may wish to create links to all the original review threads in your top post.
Thank you for this conman. I was a little surprised it was allowed in the first place as it does set a pretty terrible precedence (hardware forum font page is basically for sale...), but I think your reasoning above and your solution is fair.
If people want this type of spammy shit in a new sub, go to meta and ask/fight for it.
don't be such an arse licker Flying Hellfish.
the sheer volume of rotation of threads on these forums is reason enough for me put you on ignore for pointless comment of the year award.
Thank you for that, it's like a badge of honour for me. I humbly and personally apologize for having a different opinion than you and for having the shear ignorant audacity to share it in a public forum.
Now get back to calling people names it makes your arguments significantly stronger.
December 20, 2014, 08:39:23 AM
There are quite a number of these reviews now cluttering up the hardware area and while it was nice publicity for spondoolies, I will be locking each thread after they have been up for a couple of days and I suggest further discussion regarding the reviews should go here. @spondoolies-tech, you may wish to create links to all the original review threads in your top post.
Thank you for this conman. I was a little surprised it was allowed in the first place as it does set a pretty terrible precedence (hardware forum font page is basically for sale...), but I think your reasoning above and your solution is fair.
If people want this type of spammy shit in a new sub, go to meta and ask/fight for it.
don't be such an arse licker Flying Hellfish.
the sheer volume of rotation of threads on these forums is reason enough for me put you on ignore for pointless comment of the year award.
December 20, 2014, 08:21:05 AM
There are quite a number of these reviews now cluttering up the hardware area and while it was nice publicity for spondoolies, I will be locking each thread after they have been up for a couple of days and I suggest further discussion regarding the reviews should go here. @spondoolies-tech, you may wish to create links to all the original review threads in your top post.
Thank you for this conman. I was a little surprised it was allowed in the first place as it does set a pretty terrible precedence (hardware forum font page is basically for sale...), but I think your reasoning above and your solution is fair.
If people want this type of spammy shit in a new sub, go to meta and ask/fight for it.
December 20, 2014, 06:15:44 AM
I understand but these should really have all been collated here as it ends up being advertising for spondoolies on the forum that costs spondoolies but did not actually pay the forum. Unfortunately there is no merge function in this forum software which would be the ideal solution. Out of respect for the legendaries I've forgone the locking for now, but can I urge the reviewers themselves to lock their threads and refer back to this one once they have completed whatever they have to say instead then?
I'd say your 'urging' seems a tad aggressive and would advise against it.
To 'Urge' anyone to partake in an activity which may or may not be of his or her will, in this form of recommendation, seems clear to me that your purpose is to take the responsibility off the shoulders of the forum and it's moderators to restricting trade by Spondoolies-Tech, and 'urging' those who committed to collating a review, to do the restraining of trade, on behalf of the forum and it's moderators?
I say this, without any personal prejudice, and wholly respect the other work that you do for the community as a whole.
All of you do whatever the fuck you want, see if I care.
ck you okay?
here is a link setup.
As the first review thread posted and as the only reviewer that did not get one of these for free :
12 reviews with 2 due is 14 threads plus this thread plus my thread is 15 threads on the sp20 and that is a lot of threads.
I think locking the threads in 1 week or 3 days or the day after christmas or even the last day of hanukkah and placing the setup below in first post of this thread is not such a bad idea.
Links to the legends reviews:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-legendaries-review-party-of-spondoolies-techs-sp20-887807 Spondoolie's Legendary review offer to 10 Legends--Edit--may be 11 and 1 hereo
1) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-1-a-spondoolies-tech-sp20-in-italy-895085 spiccioli
2) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-2-a-spondoolies-tech-sp20-in-dallas-tx-895798 Xian01
3) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-review-a-green-miner-with-a-loud-fan-896161 johnyj
4) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondolies-sp20-896065 Mushroomized
5) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-3-a-spondolies-sp20-review-896004 John (John K.)
6) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-4-spondoolies-sp20-896134 SaltySpitoon
7) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-in-the-cold-896656 notlist3d
8.) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-legendary-review-896910 THE JOINT
9) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-sp20-spondoolies-by-dabs-897151 Dabs
10) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-10-spondoolies-sp20-tortured-896913 Syke
11) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/review-spondoolies-sp20-hi-res-board-pics-unofficial-support-900307 goxed
12) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/spondoolies-tech-sp20-review-one-kick-ss-little-miner-898952 blazedout419
I kind of feel responsible for starting this issue by doing the first review for free because I like the gear.
I have had people fight for me to get a free one.
I now see people like ck and raskul fighting.
I have seen more then one person calling the reviews spam
I post on and use this forum a lot.
I rather see happy miners not angry ones.
December 20, 2014, 04:22:14 AM
I understand but these should really have all been collated here as it ends up being advertising for spondoolies on the forum that costs spondoolies but did not actually pay the forum. Unfortunately there is no merge function in this forum software which would be the ideal solution. Out of respect for the legendaries I've forgone the locking for now, but can I urge the reviewers themselves to lock their threads and refer back to this one once they have completed whatever they have to say instead then?
I'd say your 'urging' seems a tad aggressive and would advise against it.
To 'Urge' anyone to partake in an activity which may or may not be of his or her will, in this form of recommendation, seems clear to me that your purpose is to take the responsibility off the shoulders of the forum and it's moderators to restricting trade by Spondoolies-Tech, and 'urging' those who committed to collating a review, to do the restraining of trade, on behalf of the forum and it's moderators?
I say this, without any personal prejudice, and wholly respect the other work that you do for the community as a whole.
All of you do whatever the fuck you want, see if I care.
December 20, 2014, 03:13:08 AM
I understand but these should really have all been collated here as it ends up being advertising for spondoolies on the forum that costs spondoolies but did not actually pay the forum. Unfortunately there is no merge function in this forum software which would be the ideal solution. Out of respect for the legendaries I've forgone the locking for now, but can I urge the reviewers themselves to lock their threads and refer back to this one once they have completed whatever they have to say instead then?
I'd say your 'urging' seems a tad aggressive and would advise against it.
To 'Urge' anyone to partake in an activity which may or may not be of his or her will, in this form of recommendation, seems clear to me that your purpose is to take the responsibility off the shoulders of the forum and it's moderators to restricting trade by Spondoolies-Tech, and 'urging' those who committed to collating a review, to do the restraining of trade, on behalf of the forum and it's moderators?
I say this, without any personal prejudice, and wholly respect the other work that you do for the community as a whole.
December 20, 2014, 03:08:24 AM
your comment quoted above, smacks of double standards and if you are locking one single manufacturer review threads and not locking others then this could be seen as you, and this Forum being complicit in a 'Restraint of Trade' that's a legal term, look it up
Not really when the reviews are conducted by people who paid for the hardware instead of got the hardware as a free gift for the promise of a (HONEST) review in return.I'm specifically reiterating the fact that dogie receives free units in return for reviews. You must also lock all of his threads.
if you are to restrain trade on spondoolies hardware, you must also take the principle of locking threads, across the board and not specifically target one individual manufacturer.
And yes, please feel free to lock every review thread in which the reviewer received the unit for free. that would be very fair; in a
December 20, 2014, 03:06:13 AM
your comment quoted above, smacks of double standards and if you are locking one single manufacturer review threads and not locking others then this could be seen as you, and this Forum being complicit in a 'Restraint of Trade' that's a legal term, look it up
Not really when the reviews are conducted by people who paid for the hardware instead of got the hardware as a free gift for the promise of a review in return. December 20, 2014, 03:05:16 AM
I understand but these should really have all been collated here as it ends up being advertising for spondoolies on the forum that costs spondoolies but did not actually pay the forum. Unfortunately there is no merge function in this forum software which would be the ideal solution. Out of respect for the legendaries I've forgone the locking for now, but can I urge the reviewers themselves to lock their threads and refer back to this one once they have completed whatever they have to say instead then?
Jump to: