I try with pa.mtred.com and still get occasional old stale dump at LP, some LP's its fine.
This is also pointing just one GPU so not alot of getwork at all.
Topic: [CLOSED] MtRed (PPS, LP+, API, 0 FEE) STRATUM on mine.mtred.com:3333 - page 36. (Read 176233 times)
June 15, 2012, 06:23:23 PM
June 15, 2012, 06:21:12 PM
June 15, 2012, 05:39:57 PM
Hasn't helped here. Look at this example: The longpoll for the same block from pool 1 (mtred) came 22 seconds after pool 0.
There was also nothing accepted for 20 seconds which at a utility of 39 shares/minute there should be ~13 shares. The 15 rejected shares works out to ~23 seconds of lost work.
Code:
[2012-06-16 08:36:23] Accepted 3081346c.7df52c66 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] Accepted bb0486ca.a2f61826 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] Accepted 97383d46.18ef510d GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:25] Accepted 522a0965.590b8cd5 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:26] Accepted e7d62d63.4dad9f5b GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] LONGPOLL from pool 1 requested work restart
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 4f88da5e.cebd5d8c GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected e8af7698.e9cb7a55 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected d5eabcf4.3afa91ce GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 7eda54a1.c6488d05 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected dca7a30a.05a49c40 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected c4bb27a2.1f0e985e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 8d77b5c5.bbdc4427 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 8c264688.49911866 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected e6202908.5a500b11 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 84d3f584.8958e243 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 4978bc94.4ae7e10d GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected fc8c7c53.4ca73617 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected 6f0a6a97.2c9ff043 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected cdb23b55.d619456f GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:50] Accepted 4eac1983.1cef3e60 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:54] Accepted 8cec7926.55893b50 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:54] Accepted 3e436c4a.08169b6a GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:55] Accepted 5f2da69b.8ebf2d6e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Rejected af974aec.80402f3f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Accepted 486cb950.d697292c GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Accepted 660719e3.2b22933c GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] Accepted bb0486ca.a2f61826 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:24] Accepted 97383d46.18ef510d GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:25] Accepted 522a0965.590b8cd5 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:26] Accepted e7d62d63.4dad9f5b GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] LONGPOLL from pool 1 requested work restart
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 4f88da5e.cebd5d8c GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected e8af7698.e9cb7a55 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected d5eabcf4.3afa91ce GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 7eda54a1.c6488d05 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected dca7a30a.05a49c40 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected c4bb27a2.1f0e985e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 8d77b5c5.bbdc4427 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 8c264688.49911866 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected e6202908.5a500b11 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 84d3f584.8958e243 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:46] Rejected 4978bc94.4ae7e10d GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected fc8c7c53.4ca73617 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected 6f0a6a97.2c9ff043 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:47] Rejected cdb23b55.d619456f GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:50] Accepted 4eac1983.1cef3e60 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:54] Accepted 8cec7926.55893b50 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:54] Accepted 3e436c4a.08169b6a GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:55] Accepted 5f2da69b.8ebf2d6e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Rejected af974aec.80402f3f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Accepted 486cb950.d697292c GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-16 08:36:56] Accepted 660719e3.2b22933c GPU 2 pool 1
There was also nothing accepted for 20 seconds which at a utility of 39 shares/minute there should be ~13 shares. The 15 rejected shares works out to ~23 seconds of lost work.
June 15, 2012, 04:41:42 PM
Was noticing the same even with single gpu connected to pa.mtred.com for some namecoin goodness.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
Hey, I think I just found the issue and fixed it.
Whatever you did seem to have worked for couple of hours but recently the reject dump came back.
June 15, 2012, 09:37:32 AM
Was noticing the same even with single gpu connected to pa.mtred.com for some namecoin goodness.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
Hey, I think I just found the issue and fixed it.
June 15, 2012, 09:35:27 AM
Was noticing the same even with single gpu connected to pa.mtred.com for some namecoin goodness.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
Right after LP it throws a ton of rejects so I can only assume its the server thats overloaded.
June 15, 2012, 04:57:45 AM
I seem to be getting a heck of a lot more rejects across longpolls lately. There's a deathly pause where no shares are being accepted, then the longpoll hits and a ton of rejects are returned along with it.
eg:
I've seen up to twice as many rejects as this too.
This machine has 2.75GH on cgminer 2.4.3
edit: here's a monster one:
eg:
Code:
[2012-06-15 19:56:56] Accepted 474d3cb6.ba57e09a GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] LONGPOLL from pool 1 detected new block
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected a3a7776a.c2c0c81a GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 5dccdbc1.5ce6dc85 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected de781d20.116097a9 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 14500521.6ac58d17 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 06324d16.70e994b1 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:04] Rejected 26a5920b.8961c4bc GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:04] Rejected 1ee51bba.9676a3f7 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:06] Accepted 05aac654.90f7fb03 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] LONGPOLL from pool 1 detected new block
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected a3a7776a.c2c0c81a GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 5dccdbc1.5ce6dc85 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected de781d20.116097a9 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 14500521.6ac58d17 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:03] Rejected 06324d16.70e994b1 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:04] Rejected 26a5920b.8961c4bc GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:04] Rejected 1ee51bba.9676a3f7 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 19:57:06] Accepted 05aac654.90f7fb03 GPU 2 pool 1
I've seen up to twice as many rejects as this too.
This machine has 2.75GH on cgminer 2.4.3
edit: here's a monster one:
Code:
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] LONGPOLL from pool 1 detected new block
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 077a4ecf.50e39ba5 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 56324165.ec7de8e2 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 9d2aa7fc.d23f797f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 74b0100e.c34e0f49 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected a0519268.132c3f8d GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 75f067a6.964e1a6f GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 95e2c906.27d56c1f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected c808a07d.0c463b4d GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 6cbaaa10.6f668321 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected d9c213f5.59d8669c GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 2fdd68a6.958e8e8a GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected e184cc0e.efd0623e GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected e2d28c95.a5fe6a22 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 84e33d33.f6ecc4d7 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected aee3afb1.fa8c347b GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 1d8d471b.eae8b003 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 51eda82a.32ff74bb GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 795eb39c.81b5f967 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 38d95929.1639c0cd GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected d038c576.e0024be2 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:00] Accepted 661e54c2.34f7804e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:01] Accepted 811e9c36.d9f71791 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:01] Accepted 5e472b8e.3c6faf8c GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:02] Rejected c09b5d56.3c8a7a88 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:03] Accepted a5f0834f.faa26cb0 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:04] Rejected 3e35a364.1a58cc24 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:05] Accepted 84ab8f58.0ccc74d6 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:06] Rejected 32b6baa8.30c20107 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:08] Accepted d5fb6e21.1cae1fd4 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 077a4ecf.50e39ba5 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 56324165.ec7de8e2 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 9d2aa7fc.d23f797f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 74b0100e.c34e0f49 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected a0519268.132c3f8d GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 75f067a6.964e1a6f GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 95e2c906.27d56c1f GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected c808a07d.0c463b4d GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 6cbaaa10.6f668321 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected d9c213f5.59d8669c GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 2fdd68a6.958e8e8a GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected e184cc0e.efd0623e GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected e2d28c95.a5fe6a22 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 84e33d33.f6ecc4d7 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected aee3afb1.fa8c347b GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 1d8d471b.eae8b003 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 51eda82a.32ff74bb GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 795eb39c.81b5f967 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected 38d95929.1639c0cd GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:17:58] Rejected d038c576.e0024be2 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:00] Accepted 661e54c2.34f7804e GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:01] Accepted 811e9c36.d9f71791 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:01] Accepted 5e472b8e.3c6faf8c GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:02] Rejected c09b5d56.3c8a7a88 GPU 2 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:03] Accepted a5f0834f.faa26cb0 GPU 0 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:04] Rejected 3e35a364.1a58cc24 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:05] Accepted 84ab8f58.0ccc74d6 GPU 3 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:06] Rejected 32b6baa8.30c20107 GPU 1 pool 1
[2012-06-15 21:18:08] Accepted d5fb6e21.1cae1fd4 GPU 1 pool 1
June 14, 2012, 09:54:51 AM
I didn't think the pool was prop, just thought maybe some miners still had their bitHopper on last year's pools. But if the hashrate increases aren't coincident with round starts, then it's likely as you say, a proxy using the pool as backup or gpumax.
This isn't the user I was talking about, but here is a good example.
(Top List)
So yeah, I'm sure.
June 14, 2012, 09:52:37 AM
Ozcoin's hashrate increases are not coincident with the start of a round. However, looking at the MtRed hashrate chart I can't where rounds start - bitlane, are you sure the increases in hashrate are at the start of the new block?
This is a PPS Pool. The increase in hashrate is from a single user that pops on every once in awhile with 200+GH/s from what I've seen. Its a single person, most likely using this as a backup pool or a gpumax private pool.
I didn't think the pool was prop, just thought maybe some miners still had their bitHopper on last year's pools. But if the hashrate increases aren't coincident with round starts, then it's likely as you say, a proxy using the pool as backup or gpumax.
June 14, 2012, 09:24:14 AM
Ozcoin's hashrate increases are not coincident with the start of a round. However, looking at the MtRed hashrate chart I can't where rounds start - bitlane, are you sure the increases in hashrate are at the start of the new block?
This is a PPS Pool. The increase in hashrate is from a single user that pops on every once in awhile with 200+GH/s from what I've seen. Its a single person, most likely using this as a backup pool or a gpumax private pool.
June 14, 2012, 08:31:59 AM
Why does the hash rate for the pool INCREASE dramatically at the beginning of every new block ?
Its the same with ozcoin and abcpool, these increases come from GPUMAX users using the pools as offline pools.
Definitely no conspiracy here.
Definitely no conspiracy here.
Ozcoin's hashrate increases are not coincident with the start of a round. However, looking at the MtRed hashrate chart I can't where rounds start - bitlane, are you sure the increases in hashrate are at the start of the new block?
June 14, 2012, 03:24:40 AM
Its the same with ozcoin and abcpool, these increases come from GPUMAX users using the pools as offline pools.
Definitely no conspiracy here.
Definitely no conspiracy here.
June 14, 2012, 02:50:46 AM
Is there a SECRET Proportional payout section for the pool that I do not have a login or link for ?
Why does the hash rate for the pool INCREASE dramatically at the beginning of every new block ?
I am going to go out on a limb here and guess that people aren't hopping to get the most out of NMC mining...so what's the deal ? This pool IS PPS, isn't it ?
Why does the hash rate for the pool INCREASE dramatically at the beginning of every new block ?
I am going to go out on a limb here and guess that people aren't hopping to get the most out of NMC mining...so what's the deal ? This pool IS PPS, isn't it ?
June 13, 2012, 05:36:50 PM
Something is wrong 
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
seconding this - wouldn't have noticed if i hadn't seen his post. getting rejects here too. (though guiminer isn't giving a percentage... god i need to set up cgminer.)
Looking into this, believe it could be due to packet loss or another culprit...
seems something is wrong with this NMC block:
NMC 9ccf02ebb4631fd9d4b4486710eb3651ec9ac82d22312d56... 12/6/12 04:39am 2h0m21s 0.00000000 375946 120 req.
Its confirmed aint moving, if its invalid how do you handle the rewards or do they get paid from the next block since those rewards seem to just remain in processing atm.
NMC 9ccf02ebb4631fd9d4b4486710eb3651ec9ac82d22312d56... 12/6/12 04:39am 2h0m21s 0.00000000 375946 120 req.
Its confirmed aint moving, if its invalid how do you handle the rewards or do they get paid from the next block since those rewards seem to just remain in processing atm.
Yes, We pay orphaned blocks, It will reflect the change and be credited later this evening.
June 13, 2012, 11:00:52 AM
seems something is wrong with this NMC block:
NMC 9ccf02ebb4631fd9d4b4486710eb3651ec9ac82d22312d56... 12/6/12 04:39am 2h0m21s 0.00000000 375946 120 req.
Its confirmed aint moving, if its invalid how do you handle the rewards or do they get paid from the next block since those rewards seem to just remain in processing atm.
NMC 9ccf02ebb4631fd9d4b4486710eb3651ec9ac82d22312d56... 12/6/12 04:39am 2h0m21s 0.00000000 375946 120 req.
Its confirmed aint moving, if its invalid how do you handle the rewards or do they get paid from the next block since those rewards seem to just remain in processing atm.
June 13, 2012, 08:06:40 AM
Something is wrong
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
seconding this - wouldn't have noticed if i hadn't seen his post. getting rejects here too. (though guiminer isn't giving a percentage... god i need to set up cgminer.)
June 13, 2012, 01:25:26 AM
Something is wrong
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
pa.mtred.com does not work and
mtred.com has high reject rates. In a period without new blocks I got 2.34% rejects with mtred, 0% with ABC and 0% with deepbit.
June 12, 2012, 05:16:22 PM
It isn't only cheap hosts. If you colocate a single server, you're vulnerable to a DDoS if any server in your rack is getting attacked. Even with entire racks, you're going to be sharing an upstream switch at some point with other servers. It all comes down to how quickly the datacenter can isolate the attack and blackhole the affected server, and how far upstream the attack separates from you.
I see, thanks for that bit of information.
June 12, 2012, 05:10:38 PM
I'm guessing you guys are on a VPS then?
Doesn't exactly mean that, they could be on the same network line. I've seen hosts that offer cheaper 1gbit connections because they are shared with other boxes.
It isn't only cheap hosts. If you colocate a single server, you're vulnerable to a DDoS if any server in your rack is getting attacked. Even with entire racks, you're going to be sharing an upstream switch at some point with other servers. It all comes down to how quickly the datacenter can isolate the attack and blackhole the affected server, and how far upstream the attack separates from you.
June 12, 2012, 05:06:01 PM
auto payment having problems? or is there a lower threshold i'm not meeting? trying to set it to .05 btc, but i have confirmed over .09. (my mhash sucks...)
aaand payment. ignore me.
aaand payment. ignore me.
Jump to: