Topic: [CLOSED] MtRed (PPS, LP+, API, 0 FEE) STRATUM on mine.mtred.com:3333 - page 41. (Read 176233 times)
April 22, 2012, 10:54:37 AM
guys, im confused, is there a fee for PPS on this pool or not ?
April 20, 2012, 10:02:27 PM
Any idea when is MM might be turned back on?
April 20, 2012, 11:37:50 AM
Pool is down again.
ಠ_ಠ my face waking up. I am negotiations prices with our new host. Hopefully we will be on it before May.
April 20, 2012, 03:35:07 AM
Pool is down again.
April 17, 2012, 09:35:38 AM
So who knows a good hosting provider. We are switching in the next week or soo....
Trying to get up with our host right now. This is the 3rd unexpected reboot in the last 2 weeks. Bitcoin started back up, but the mine didn't. Either way the server shouldn't have gone down at 2am.
I am sorry for the inconvenience.
RR
Trying to get up with our host right now. This is the 3rd unexpected reboot in the last 2 weeks. Bitcoin started back up, but the mine didn't. Either way the server shouldn't have gone down at 2am.
I am sorry for the inconvenience.
RR
April 17, 2012, 08:15:05 AM
Pool is still "Dead"... Guess that's the price you pay for paying no fees 
Why don't introduce a mandatory fee of 1.5-2% if that helps improving the uptime. That's still very low compared to other PPS pools. I just began to like Mt. Red but if it doesn't get more reliable I'll switch back to BTC Guild - 5% fee but I can't remember when the pool was offline the last time.
Why don't introduce a mandatory fee of 1.5-2% if that helps improving the uptime. That's still very low compared to other PPS pools. I just began to like Mt. Red but if it doesn't get more reliable I'll switch back to BTC Guild - 5% fee but I can't remember when the pool was offline the last time.
April 17, 2012, 02:17:18 AM
Stats look weird. Shows 0 hash rate for the pool.
April 17, 2012, 02:13:01 AM
Pool is down!?
April 12, 2012, 08:06:37 AM
Ok, thanks.
April 12, 2012, 07:59:17 AM
I still don't get what this has to do with some "exploit" (?) mentioned by jkminkov on the last page.
Neither do I, but I don't know who he is and figure his answer is an irrelevant opinion since the pool operator already previously responded to questions about confirmations. April 12, 2012, 07:32:34 AM
I still don't get what this has to do with some "exploit" (?) mentioned by jkminkov on the last page.
April 12, 2012, 07:26:34 AM
RTFT PPL
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=15929.msg752172;topicseen#msg752172
and a response from redditorrex immediately below
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=15929.msg752172;topicseen#msg752172
and a response from redditorrex immediately below
April 12, 2012, 07:14:27 AM
What do you mean by "all pool reserves"? It's not possible to fake work/shares, so no one can earn more than he should accounting for his contributed work. What kind of exploit are you talking about? No other PPS Pool waits for 120 confirmations. (Because that's *usually* the concept of PPS.)
I'm just wondering.
I'm just wondering.
April 12, 2012, 07:00:42 AM
Then why wait for 120 confirmations?
120 confirmation is long enough to see if anyone haven't used some exploit to get all pool reserves in a few seconds
April 12, 2012, 06:49:26 AM
Then why wait for 120 confirmations? Also, isn't it a problem to have 0-fee and at the same time pay for orphans? I mean look at ArsBitcoin and their buffer of -1000 BTC...
But as rejects are down to 0.4% for me, I'm switching over to Mt. Red now - please keep the stales this low (or even lower
)
But as rejects are down to 0.4% for me, I'm switching over to Mt. Red now - please keep the stales this low (or even lower
) April 11, 2012, 06:57:48 PM
What's keeping me from mining with Mt. Red are very high stales (> 1%).
I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
Seriously? You're paying 5% in fees instead of losing (presumably) <2% in stales? I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
But I'll give Mt. Red another try.
We pay orphan blocks.
April 11, 2012, 05:33:08 PM
What's keeping me from mining with Mt. Red are very high stales (> 1%).
I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
Seriously? You're paying 5% in fees instead of losing (presumably) <2% in stales? I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
But I'll give Mt. Red another try.
April 11, 2012, 11:29:09 AM
@ShadesOfMarble I'm getting less than .5% stales right now
@Redditorex You guys offer higher PPS value than other pools (0.0000307398438317 while everybody else seems to be in the 0.000029XXXXXXXXXX range). Have you considered dialing the PPS value amount back a tad until the buffer is healthy?
@Redditorex You guys offer higher PPS value than other pools (0.0000307398438317 while everybody else seems to be in the 0.000029XXXXXXXXXX range). Have you considered dialing the PPS value amount back a tad until the buffer is healthy?
April 11, 2012, 04:38:50 AM
What's keeping me from mining with Mt. Red are very high stales (> 1%).
I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
Seriously? You're paying 5% in fees instead of losing (presumably) <2% in stales? Also, was your comment including consideration of the post just above yours?I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
Running against the latest bitcoind, I've seen various improvements all around. Stales appear to be lower, and load seems to be down.
April 11, 2012, 01:17:55 AM
What's keeping me from mining with Mt. Red are very high stales (> 1%).
I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
I don't care about MM/NMC, but usually (on other pools) I have a reject rate of 0.1% or less (0.01% on BTCGuild).
Jump to: