seems like it.
To rational people, it seems like GPU-only owners unwilling to adapt are the ones requesting and performing the manipulation.
It's not about ASIC adoption. It's about giving power, control to one giant. I also support FPGA mining.
The issue is with the coin that took a stance on ASIC resistance and deviating from it.
There is also a $15k ASIC with 40k sols. How many can afford it? Now imagine in future that's the only one that's available. Who would be able to afford those?
Profiting is the first priority for everyone but let's not give away the control to some corp. Even GPU mining can lead to centralization but the likelihood of that happening is much lower than with ASICs.
Flawed argument. If a coin is only gpu mineable, then you can say same thing that not many can afford $15000 worth gpus. You get what you pay. You pay more you get more. It's simple math. I am gpu mining supporter but that doesn't mean I will support your flawed arguments but I will support any comment (even pro-asic) if it is rational and objective. Seriously some you guys are like religious nuts.
Also FPGAs will share the same fate as ASICs. They are also controlled by only a few corps. supplies are very limited, no retail availabilty and currently no hope for people living out of US/EURO region. Underground mining has been going on for more then year meanwhile still consumer availability of bitstreams is still uncertain. You are complaing about a $15000 ASIC but praising a $6000 FPGA.
Flawded argument, with GPUs you don't have to invest $15K to be able to mine something. As far as I know no FPGA manufacturer compete with its customers.