Pages:
Author

Topic: DiceBitco.in - New Thread to Discuss - page 20. (Read 20658 times)

sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 251
September 08, 2014, 02:34:48 PM
#89
Any news from dicebitcoin regarding this? Who invested another 500BTC in the site??? This is just wrong
m19
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
September 08, 2014, 02:34:02 PM
#88
Welp as an investor, I lost 2.5 of my 3 bitcoins. I came home from an exhausting workday to find the bankroll had been eaten alive, therefore me making a larger % of the roll, had lost 2.5 bitcoins to this "Mateo". Before leaving for work, I had a decent profit.

As a college student, this is a lot of money to me, especially considering I bought at $900+

This type of shenanigans makes me want turn my back on Bitcoin. Its been nothing but a massive money pit - I lose money at every turn. Dooglus is the light in a dark environment. He provided trust to a trust-less system. He is knowledgeable, trustworthy, helpful and ran a service that was second-to-none. He is one of the most respectful figures I've seen in the Bitcoin space. After I found out he was promoting a new site I could invest in, well, my ears perked up.

I should have known better than to chase after "the next Just-Dice". I have only myself to blame for losing more than I could have afforded to. I took a stupid risk.

Dooglus, If you're reading this, please move to Mexico so you can open Just-Dice again! /comic relief

Bankroll management. Don't invest what you can't miss. Consider it a lesson Wink
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 118
September 08, 2014, 02:33:05 PM
#87
So what's the deal? Was Mateo just really, really lucky or was there something fishy going on (i.e. he found an exploit in the system)?
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348
September 08, 2014, 02:32:47 PM
#86
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.
By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".
like I said they should roll back mateos bets. But a bankroll that has players betting the max a high percentage of the time will be adversely affected if one person has a little bit of good luck. I would say that not all of the 15% losses that investors sustained were from him (most probably were) but some percentage were from other legit players who had a lucky streak and stopped.
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 254
September 08, 2014, 02:32:15 PM
#85
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.

By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".

mateo would have to win 380 MAX BETS at 49.5/2x in a row to do that sort of damage.  And remember that Mateo was betting no where near the Max Bet in the beginning.  His biggest bets being 2BTC?  or was it 1.  i forget already.

He was betting at 0.75 when the max profit was 0.8, I remember seeing. (all on 2x payout)

he was betting at 1 when max was around 2.5.  i dont remember if he had started playing before the BR crash to 500.  Does anyone remember him playing at bankroll around 1500?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
September 08, 2014, 02:30:47 PM
#84
It looks like the site will keep running? Trollbox is gone, but there is still a "bankroll" showing (can it be verified to exist?) and people are still gambling there currently.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
September 08, 2014, 02:29:35 PM
#83
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.

By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".

mateo would have to win 380 MAX BETS at 49.5/2x in a row to do that sort of damage.  And remember that Mateo was betting no where near the Max Bet in the beginning.  His biggest bets being 2BTC?  or was it 1.  i forget already.

He was betting at 0.75 when the max profit was 0.8, I remember seeing. (all on 2x payout)
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
September 08, 2014, 02:25:33 PM
#82
Welp as an investor, I lost 2.5 of my 3 bitcoins. I came home from an exhausting workday to find the bankroll had been eaten alive, therefore me making a larger % of the roll, had lost 2.5 bitcoins to this "Mateo". Before leaving for work, I had a decent profit.

As a college student, this is a lot of money to me, especially considering I bought at $900+

This type of shenanigans makes me want turn my back on Bitcoin. Its been nothing but a massive money pit - I lose money at every turn. Dooglus is the light in a dark environment. He provided trust to a trust-less system. He is knowledgeable, trustworthy, helpful and ran a service that was second-to-none. He is one of the most respectful figures I've seen in the Bitcoin space. After I found out he was promoting a new site I could invest in, well, my ears perked up.

I should have known better than to chase after "the next Just-Dice". I have only myself to blame for losing more than I could have afforded to. I took a stupid risk.

Dooglus, If you're reading this, please move to Mexico so you can open Just-Dice again! /comic relief
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 254
September 08, 2014, 02:16:48 PM
#81
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.

By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".

mateo would have to win 380 MAX BETS at 49.5/2x in a row to do that sort of damage.  And remember that Mateo was betting no where near the Max Bet in the beginning.  His biggest bets being 2BTC?  or was it 1.  i forget already.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
September 08, 2014, 02:14:48 PM
#80
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.

By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".


you are Mateo...just admit it!   Cheesy   ~u a fool
hero member
Activity: 537
Merit: 524
September 08, 2014, 02:12:43 PM
#79
Everybody who thinks it is a little bit of bad luck with Mateo should try http://botdice.com/. Input the right numbers and try to repeat Mateo's lucky streak to win 550 BTC. Hint: not gonna happen (max I saw was 180 BTC profit after 10k bets but then it went south fast)
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
September 08, 2014, 02:05:09 PM
#78
Handing out these refunds likely scarred investors away which ultimately lead to having a bank roll that is not capable of sustaining a little bit of bad luck.

By the looks of it this wasn't "a little bit of bad luck".

From what I'm hearing people who stayed invested for Mateo have lost around 85% of their investment. Losing 85% of your site's bankroll with a dynamic 0.5% max profit is more than just "a little bit of bad luck".
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 01:55:39 PM
#77
Support ticket answered, and I got my bitcoin back. Still cannot believe it, but wanted to share, not all hope is lost.
Huh?? they said they wouldn't refund my 0.3 BTC!!
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
September 08, 2014, 01:55:26 PM
#76
Support ticket answered, and I got my bitcoin back. Still cannot believe it, but wanted to share, not all hope is lost.
ok coming from a newbie not helpful but i guess is some what of a good sign?Huh?
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
September 08, 2014, 01:55:23 PM
#75
Support ticket answered, and I got my bitcoin back. Still cannot believe it, but wanted to share, not all hope is lost.

Weird, alot of newbies coming out with accounts registered a few months ago.. and claiming to have gotten a withdrawal.. hmmm. Proof please?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 1
September 08, 2014, 01:54:22 PM
#74
Support ticket answered, and I got my bitcoin back. Still cannot believe it, but wanted to share, not all hope is lost.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
September 08, 2014, 01:53:34 PM
#73
You people do realize that you're talking about doxxing somebody that is proven to have paid back the losers, right?

But not proven to have stolen bitcoins and/or refunded everyone.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
September 08, 2014, 01:53:06 PM
#72
You people do realize that you're talking about doxxing somebody that is proven to have paid back the losers, right?
I am saying what if it was a dice site that hired someone to do this to them on purpose I wouldnt be surprised, but in compepetion there can be dirty ops invovled
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 01:51:37 PM
#71
You people do realize that you're talking about doxxing somebody that is proven to have paid back the losers, right?
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
September 08, 2014, 01:48:22 PM
#70
What if one of the dice ops attacked them by hiring a hacker, but then why not close site betting then?  This is what bugs me
Pages:
Jump to: