Thanks for the suggestion. But your silly link is simply some glossed-over generalities.
Look into Göbekli Tepe alone to find that the simple hunter gatherer idea is stupid. We have hunter gatherers today. But the site at Göbekli Tepe from about 12,000 years ago, is only about 1/50th excavated, and couldn't have been made by simple, ignorant hunter gatherers. All kinds math and quarrying techniques show that there was science around way back then, some of it equaling our own.
If we don't know who build something, and how, then we shouldn't hastily bring more uncertainties into the subject, by giving some explanations without single proof.
I don't say that you are doing that in this Göbekli Tepe case, but we could see that kind of behaviour in that silly Ancient Aliens series, where they simply explained everything they don't know by "aliens". Things should be questioned ofc, but for example, archeologists work hard for decades to uncover the truth, work on the site, and then some self-thaught " expert" comes and solves the mistery without ever leaving his parents basement.
Three points about Göbekli Tepe:
1. Research;
2. Age;
3. Sophistication.
1. Nobody should take my word for it. However I have been checking it out for some time now. But, Göbekli Tepe is all over the Net; anybody can check it out. What exists there is agreed on by the scientific community. What isn't agreed on is how it got there.
2. Personally I don't agree with carbon dating accuracy. While there are lots of times that it is accurate, there are lots of times it isn't. That being said, the general scientific community says Göbekli Tepe is as old as 11,500 years or so, and older. And this is with only about 2% of the site being excavated so far.
3. The sophistication of the parts of Göbekli Tepe that have been excavated show that simple hunter gatherers couldn't have built it. Check into it. The technology in Göbekli Tepe shows an advanced civilization. Like Egypt and other ancient nations, the moving of stone blocks of the size in Göbekli Tepe, and the sophistication of aligning them to the stars, shows advanced math and engineering that doesn't fit hunter gatherer simple civilization. Today we would have trouble moving some of the stones. So, how could primitive peoples have done it more than 11,500 years ago?
Ignore the ancient technology and engineering if you want, but there is something there that doesn't fit with the general prehistoric stuff that standard science has been preaching for the last 100 years.
EDIT: The
Ancient Aliens series, and others, are sensationalism designed to make money off the ignorance of people.
^^^ Really!
Actually, ancient prehistoric peoples of earth landed on the moon thousands of years ago. Some people think that the moon landing was a conspiracy, but an even bigger conspiracy is that 10,000 years ago people were simple hunter gatherers. Ten thousand years ago, the technology of earth was far ahead of ours.....
Nobody landed on the moon prior to Apollo.
The only footprints on the moon are from the Apollo astronauts.
We have photographed and digitized the entire moon, everything down to the size of a football.
Any such marks would be clearly visible.
Hey! Thanks for playing.
A standard football is about 11 inches long, and about 7 inches thick at its center -
https://www.sportsrec.com/6560043/what-is-the-official-size-of-the-nfl-football. This means that you could easily stick a football in a 12 inch by 12 inch square foot area on the floor.
There's 27,878,400 square feet in a square mile (5280*5280). This means you could easily get 27,878,400 footballs in a square mile.
There are about 14,600,000 square miles of surface area on the moon -
https://www.space.com/18135-how-big-is-the-moon.html. I'll let you do the math to figure out how many footballs could fit on the completely mapped surface of the moon.
The point is, you checked out each one of those footballs? (No, but NASA has... LOL.)
EDIT: Son-of-a-gun, Spendy. You've been getting kinda goofy lately. Lose your job and started drinking?