Pages:
Author

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 9. (Read 7469 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
November 07, 2019, 01:39:05 AM
-snip-

I may disagree with everything you've ever written on these Politics and Society threads, but that image is a masterclass in comedy. Thanks. Have a merit.

You do realise though that the chimp has his fingers in his ears because of the deafening sound of Apollo 11 launching?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 06, 2019, 11:21:42 PM
...The Apollo 11 lunar lander is made from curtain rods, aluminum foil, tar paper, scotch tape, and BMX bicycle parts. It's a fucking homeless tweeker's shelter and there's no defending that pile of garbage bruh. The Moon landing hoax hasn't aged well, we can zoom in on those high res images today and see the fraud!...

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 06, 2019, 10:08:00 PM

The Moon is not a solid object it's a light in the sky, a 32 nmi wide disk of electrical plasma.

1965 scientist claims the moon is plasma, landing on it won’t be possible | RetroFocus -- https://youtu.be/1oCNGcbwxWg

However, this is different than your early flat earth posts said. When are you going to release for us the complete physics that you base your stuff on? I ask this because your ideas don't work in the face of other physics.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
November 06, 2019, 05:58:04 PM
If the moon landing was a hoax then 100% of NASA's workforce would have shouted it to the world back in the 60's and 70's and would be continuing to shout it now. The fact that no scientific groups anywhere in the world dispute the moon landings and the only people who argue this are internet loons shilling for money and attention should be a massive red flag to all of you on the fence.

Exactly the same goes for global warming. I've been on another thread, linking to the report the other day on human-caused climate change signed by 11,000 scientists, and full of evidence... but no, it's not enough.
You'll never convince these people with flimsy things like proof...

No, that's really not a "report on human-caused climate change", and it's not "full of evidence."

Rather it's a strange and odd bit of advocacy for "social and ecological justice."
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
November 06, 2019, 05:46:24 PM
...

1965 scientist claims the moon is plasma, landing on it won’t be possible | RetroFocus -- ....

Well, four years later that sciency guy was proved wrong.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 06, 2019, 03:01:53 PM
^^^ The Apollo 11 lunar lander is made from curtain rods, aluminum foil, tar paper, scotch tape, and BMX bicycle parts. It's a fucking homeless tweeker's shelter and there's no defending that pile of garbage bruh. The Moon landing hoax hasn't aged well, we can zoom in on those high res images today and see the fraud!

The Moon is not a solid object it's a light in the sky, a 32 nmi wide disk of electrical plasma.

1965 scientist claims the moon is plasma, landing on it won’t be possible | RetroFocus -- https://youtu.be/1oCNGcbwxWg











Images: NASA
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 06, 2019, 02:24:26 PM
If the moon landing was a hoax then 100% of NASA's workforce would have shouted it to the world back in the 60's and 70's and would be continuing to shout it now. The fact that no scientific groups anywhere in the world dispute the moon landings and the only people who argue this are internet loons shilling for money and attention should be a massive red flag to all of you on the fence.

Exactly the same goes for global warming. I've been on another thread, linking to the report the other day on human-caused climate change signed by 11,000 scientists, and full of evidence... but no, it's not enough.
You'll never convince these people with flimsy things like proof...

The evidence for NOT landing on the moon has been debunked.

The evidence for global warming has been countered sufficiently so that we don't know.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
November 06, 2019, 02:16:33 PM
If the moon landing was a hoax then 100% of NASA's workforce would have shouted it to the world back in the 60's and 70's and would be continuing to shout it now. The fact that no scientific groups anywhere in the world dispute the moon landings and the only people who argue this are internet loons shilling for money and attention should be a massive red flag to all of you on the fence.

Exactly the same goes for global warming. I've been on another thread, linking to the report the other day on human-caused climate change signed by 11,000 scientists, and full of evidence... but no, it's not enough.
You'll never convince these people with flimsy things like proof...
sr. member
Activity: 1197
Merit: 482
November 06, 2019, 12:14:14 PM
You guys need to spend less time watching youtube conspiracy videos and more time talking to the people that do space exploration for a living. If the moon landing was a hoax then 100% of NASA's workforce would have shouted it to the world back in the 60's and 70's and would be continuing to shout it now. The fact that no scientific groups anywhere in the world dispute the moon landings and the only people who argue this are internet loons shilling for money and attention should be a massive red flag to all of you on the fence.

Also...
https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-all-six-apollo-moon-landing-sites/
hero member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 507
November 06, 2019, 10:14:14 AM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Leaving all the space exploration mission, I personally believe the moon landing of 1969 was a play and dramatized by the USA to hold superiority over USSR during the cold war. There are lot of videos online which suggest that the lading was hoax and if you see them, you would certainly find it fishy. The way such videos have proved using images surfaced during the landing do suggest that the landing was played here on Earth in one of the hangers of Area 51.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
November 06, 2019, 02:18:03 AM
I have come across few stories that say that indeed the landing on the moon in 1969 by USA was a hoax and there are hypothesis to support the same. It was supposedly done by USA during the cold war to prove its technological superiority over USSR.
... and yet the USSR and indeed every country with an opinion on the matter accepts the moon landing as fact.


I now wonder whats there on the dark side of the moon  and why have we not sent a rover there ?
More moon. I think China sent a probe there a few months back.
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 501
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
November 05, 2019, 11:15:14 PM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I have come across few stories that say that indeed the landing on the moon in 1969 by USA was a hoax and there are hypothesis to support the same. It was supposedly done by USA during the cold war to prove its technological superiority over USSR. I now wonder whats there on the dark side of the moon  and why have we not sent a rover there ?

You have a point because they can manipulate from believing all of the people that they land on the moon because of battling from USSR to defeat them from the fight on who will have the best technology during cold War.

I doubt for now on how they didn't focus on the moon if it is only a theory about moon right?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
November 04, 2019, 02:53:55 PM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976....

I have come across few stories that say that indeed the landing on the moon in 1969 by USA was a hoax and there are hypothesis to support the same. It was supposedly done by USA during the cold war to prove its technological superiority over USSR....

You mean, all six US manned lunar landings were hoaxes?

Your bringing up the first Apple computer is interesting. Many, many computers existed at that time, but not in the shape and fashion of the Apple. The Apollo flight computer was built from scratch, and certainly in design, shape and fashion is the grandfather of the Apple computer.

There's a more likely possibility than your suggestion that Apollo was a stunt to show tech superiority, which is that we were able to do it BECAUSE OF OUR TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY. The Soviet moon rocket N1 had four catastrophic failures in a row ... then they gave up .... The Soviets showed to the entire world, their technological INFERIORITY.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iuo3J8L9b8

The Saturn rocket used by the US never had a failure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPhhFvUwseg

sr. member
Activity: 744
Merit: 266
November 04, 2019, 01:02:20 PM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I have come across few stories that say that indeed the landing on the moon in 1969 by USA was a hoax and there are hypothesis to support the same. It was supposedly done by USA during the cold war to prove its technological superiority over USSR. I now wonder whats there on the dark side of the moon  and why have we not sent a rover there ?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
November 04, 2019, 10:10:20 AM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

There are certain theories which says that the moon landing in 1969 by USA was actually a hoax and every part of the play was recorded in one of the hangers at Area 51. This was done during race for supremacy between USSR and USA which was played at technology front. While USSR has successfully launched SPUTNIK , USA had to prove its metal and had to do something significantly different.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
November 04, 2019, 08:36:23 AM
If actually it was a theory then how about from landing on the mars?  Because why they actually experiment and plant on a mars when they didn't success from landing on the moon?  As they evidence have a unreality event that can show edited? Can someone explain?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 03, 2019, 04:08:19 PM
^^^ Of course, it is only a theory that those theories are really theories.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 262
November 03, 2019, 12:54:40 PM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

There are certain theories which says that the moon landing in 1969 by USA was actually a hoax and every part of the play was recorded in one of the hangers at Area 51. This was done during race for supremacy between USSR and USA which was played at technology front. While USSR has successfully launched SPUTNIK , USA had to prove its metal and had to do something significantly different.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
November 03, 2019, 10:43:58 AM
Sorry, I know it's a digression, but I'm compelled to anwer this.

just a joke circulating, like the human theory that comes from the apes that does not make sense to me.
if humans from monkeys, why do monkeys still exist until now and have not evolved to become human ??

The question doesn't make sense. We didn't evolve from modern monkeys. Modern-day humans and modern-day monkeys evolved from a common ancestor. Yes that ancestor would have been a type of monkey, just not a modern monkey - because modern monkeys have also evolved since then.
But it didn't start with monkeys of course, you can go back and back, your family tree and mine and that of every mammal extends back to the point where life first crawled out of the sea onto the land. And it goes further back even than that... it doesn't start and end with monkeys.

Here's an analogy to answer your question: My father’s father died many years ago, but he left quite a few living descendants, including me, my sister, and my paternal cousins. To ask the question ‘If humans evolved from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys?’ is a bit like asking me ‘If you are descended from your grandfather, how come your cousins are still alive?’ The question doesn’t make any sense: why shouldn’t my cousins still be alive?


cue the evolution denial idiot reply in 3...2...  (they tend to frequent moon landing hoax, flat earth threads and other lunacy..... funny that....)
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
November 03, 2019, 02:26:14 AM
Sorry, I know it's a digression, but I'm compelled to anwer this.

just a joke circulating, like the human theory that comes from the apes that does not make sense to me.
if humans from monkeys, why do monkeys still exist until now and have not evolved to become human ??

The question doesn't make sense. We didn't evolve from modern monkeys. Modern-day humans and modern-day monkeys evolved from a common ancestor. Yes that ancestor would have been a type of monkey, just not a modern monkey - because modern monkeys have also evolved since then.
But it didn't start with monkeys of course, you can go back and back, your family tree and mine and that of every mammal extends back to the point where life first crawled out of the sea onto the land. And it goes further back even than that... it doesn't start and end with monkeys.

Here's an analogy to answer your question: My father’s father died many years ago, but he left quite a few living descendants, including me, my sister, and my paternal cousins. To ask the question ‘If humans evolved from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys?’ is a bit like asking me ‘If you are descended from your grandfather, how come your cousins are still alive?’ The question doesn’t make any sense: why shouldn’t my cousins still be alive?
Pages:
Jump to: