Did we actually really land on moon? - page 8.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: BADecker on November 10, 2019, 08:08:05 PM

Quote from: notbatman on November 10, 2019, 04:31:14 PM

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

https://i.imgur.com/QzoJ2rB.png

So you think Epstein is out there walking on the moon, eh?

Do they serve you good meals in the funny farm?

Cool

Quote from: notbatman on November 10, 2019, 11:47:19 PM

^^^

So, now you think that Epstein left a plaque on the moon while he was walking there.

You didn't answer about how good the meals are in your funny farm. Do they have LSD in them?

Cool

ðºÞæ

sr. member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 297

Bitcoin © Maximalist

The best part is the "Moon Buggy".
On a mission where weight is a major issue some crazy heavy electric vehicle to be used only once for some wheel spin's.
Why 3 vehicles and not reuse the first?
Maybe tax money could have been better spend with some real scientific research instead of the juvenile antics.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1386

Quote from: styca on November 11, 2019, 02:34:37 AM

I'm conflicted now. I'm 100% certain that we did land on the moon, but the signature of Richard Nixon does have a tendency to throw doubt on any argument Wink

Well, if we didn't land on the Moon, how did he get there to sign it?

styca

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 354

I'm conflicted now. I'm 100% certain that we did land on the moon, but the signature of Richard Nixon does have a tendency to throw doubt on any argument Wink

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on November 10, 2019, 04:31:14 PM

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

https://i.imgur.com/QzoJ2rB.png

So you think Epstein is out there walking on the moon, eh?

Do they serve you good meals in the funny farm?

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1386

Quote from: notbatman on November 10, 2019, 11:40:00 AM

<>

Space is gay and fake, we didn't go to the moon and, Epstein didn't kill himself.

If the "we" is "you and people that think like you" then I agree, your "we" didn't go to the Moon.

But in the real world the possibility that we didn't go to the Moon is zero, and the possibility that Epstein killed himself is non zero, maybe one in a trillion chance.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Space is gay and fake, we didn't go to the moon and, Epstein didn't kill himself.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1386

Quote from: styca on November 10, 2019, 10:05:58 AM

Quote from: BADecker on November 10, 2019, 10:00:42 AM

Quote from: styca on November 10, 2019, 09:51:57 AM

There was a chance of failure, and yet the US didn't suddenly announce oh by the way we've gone to the moon and here's the proof.
Kennedy spent most of the '60s banging on about it from the "We choose to go to the Moon" speech onwards... when obviously there was a huge chance it wouldn't work.
The government spent huge amounts of money trying to reduce the risk of failure, and it worked, the moon landing happened. A phenomenal achievement.
If they realised during the '60s that it would fail, they couldn't really say with any credibility: actually we've spent vast sums of money on this but you know, we're not going to bother.
Once that first speech happened, it was in public, succeed or fail.

Yes, it happened. But the films that were made public while it was happening, aren't necessarily the actual films of it being done. Or do you have some inside info somehow?

Cool

I'll concede that they aren't necessarily at-the-time films. It would be a sensible insurance policy to cover themselves and only show the event after it had already happened.

Real time TV cameras were taken on the Apollo missions, but the vast majority and all the high quality work was film, and was developed only after return to Earth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera

styca

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 354

Quote from: BADecker on November 10, 2019, 10:00:42 AM

Quote from: styca on November 10, 2019, 09:51:57 AM

There was a chance of failure, and yet the US didn't suddenly announce oh by the way we've gone to the moon and here's the proof.
Kennedy spent most of the '60s banging on about it from the "We choose to go to the Moon" speech onwards... when obviously there was a huge chance it wouldn't work.
The government spent huge amounts of money trying to reduce the risk of failure, and it worked, the moon landing happened. A phenomenal achievement.
If they realised during the '60s that it would fail, they couldn't really say with any credibility: actually we've spent vast sums of money on this but you know, we're not going to bother.
Once that first speech happened, it was in public, succeed or fail.

Yes, it happened. But the films that were made public while it was happening, aren't necessarily the actual films of it being done. Or do you have some inside info somehow?

Cool

I'll concede that they aren't necessarily at-the-time films. It would be a sensible insurance policy to cover themselves and only show the event after it had already happened.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: styca on November 10, 2019, 09:51:57 AM

There was a chance of failure, and yet the US didn't suddenly announce oh by the way we've gone to the moon and here's the proof.
Kennedy spent most of the '60s banging on about it from the "We choose to go to the Moon" speech onwards... when obviously there was a huge chance it wouldn't work.
The government spent huge amounts of money trying to reduce the risk of failure, and it worked, the moon landing happened. A phenomenal achievement.
If they realised during the '60s that it would fail, they couldn't really say with any credibility: actually we've spent vast sums of money on this but you know, we're not going to bother.
Once that first speech happened, it was in public, succeed or fail.

Yes, it happened. But the films that were made public while it was happening, aren't necessarily the actual films of it being done. Or do you have some inside info somehow?

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

They're launching balloons to extreme altitudes with rockets. Those balloons also known as satelloons are made from Mylar and reflect the sunlight down. The average cow believes it's an Arthur C. Clarke satellite but it's a secret space program. It's secret because they lie about the globe and launch balloons a 1000 miles up over a flat and motionless plain.

styca

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 354

There was a chance of failure, and yet the US didn't suddenly announce oh by the way we've gone to the moon and here's the proof.
Kennedy spent most of the '60s banging on about it from the "We choose to go to the Moon" speech onwards... when obviously there was a huge chance it wouldn't work.
The government spent huge amounts of money trying to reduce the risk of failure, and it worked, the moon landing happened. A phenomenal achievement.
If they realised during the '60s that it would fail, they couldn't really say with any credibility: actually we've spent vast sums of money on this but you know, we're not going to bother.
Once that first speech happened, it was in public, succeed or fail.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

^^^ Again, would you show everyone in the world the actual photos of something like a moon landing while you were doing it?

1. It's top secret.

2. If there were a chance for failure... why show it until there is certainty? And then it is too late to change the movies.

3. The actual filming is private property even if it is government funded.

4. A camera in space with tech from '69 isn't going to show anything clearly.

Cool

styca

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 354

Maybe the moon landing is fake after all. The more I look at the photos, the more I can see they don't quite look real.

Seriously though, every argument that we didn't land there has been thoroughly debunked.
The only reason to think it's fake is a love of conspiracy theories.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on November 07, 2019, 12:57:50 PM

Quote from: notbatman on November 07, 2019, 11:43:45 AM

If the rocket doesn't blow up mid-flight or isn't just straight up CGI/models, ....

In reality, the world wide rocket launch schedule is published and well known for years into the future.

https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/launch-schedule/

Besides, the rocket blow-ups of the past have been clearly and widely documented. The documentation shows that rockets were gradually improved so that they barely ever blow up any longer.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1386

Quote from: notbatman on November 07, 2019, 11:43:45 AM

If the rocket doesn't blow up mid-flight or isn't just straight up CGI/models, ....

In reality, the world wide rocket launch schedule is published and well known for years into the future.

https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/launch-schedule/

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on November 07, 2019, 11:43:45 AM

If the rocket doesn't blow up mid-flight or isn't just straight up CGI/models, it ends up at the bottom of the Bermuda triangle.

The only rockets that aren't "stage magic" are the rockets the military uses to launch giant ultra-high altitude (1000 miles) mylar balloons. I suspect there's a layer of dense/liquid-crystal gas that needs a rocket to penetrate to insert the balloon above, like a tampon dispenser.

They tend to prefer twisting and inverting the truth rather than a straight up hoax/lie if at all possible. They love being misleading and having the audience make an assumption and come to some absurd conclusion; it's all about manipulating your perceptions.

https://i.imgur.com/BXcRM37.jpg

Black Arrow R4 on display in the Science Museum, with the stages and fairing separated, and the flight spare of the Prospero satellite (satelloon balloon).
^{Image: By Andy Dingley - Author's own photo, CC BY-SA 3.0}

https://i.imgur.com/CcdHfGw.jpg

(((Project Echo)))
^{Image: Public Domain}

https://i.imgur.com/crpado9.jpg
^{Image: Occult}

Hey, man, if you would foramlize your religion as a 501-c-3 religion, you could probably get all kinds of kickbacks from government and the IRS.

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

If the rocket doesn't blow up mid-flight or isn't just straight up CGI/models, it ends up at the bottom of the Bermuda triangle.

The only rockets that aren't "stage magic" are the rockets the military uses to launch giant ultra-high altitude (1000 miles) mylar balloons. I suspect there's a layer of dense/liquid-crystal gas that needs a rocket to penetrate to insert the balloon above, like a tampon dispenser.

They tend to prefer twisting and inverting the truth rather than a straight up hoax/lie if at all possible. They love being misleading and having the audience make an assumption and come to some absurd conclusion; it's all about manipulating your perceptions.

Black Arrow R4 on display in the Science Museum, with the stages and fairing separated, and the flight spare of the Prospero satellite (satelloon balloon).
^{Image: By Andy Dingley - Author's own photo, CC BY-SA 3.0}

(((Project Echo)))
^{Image: Public Domain}

^{Image: Occult}

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 8. (Read 7469 times)